RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03153
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: APR 16, 2008
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a higher discharge
character, preferably honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His record of nonjudicial punishment (Article 15) shows only minor,
isolated offenses. Personal and financial problems impaired his ability to
serve. Offenses he was charged with were trumped up and all the people he
used drugs with (tiny amount) were willing users as he was and they all
shared their marijuana, beer, and finally cocaine (for 3 weeks). No one
was coerced, made any money nor tried to--it was recreational.
The applicant further stated, “it took him this long to realize that all of
his friends who testified against him in his court-martial did everything
he did--bought, shared (gave and sold) pot and coke and the sentence was
severe for a 20-year old kid who was immature and naïve.”
In support of his request, the applicant provided an abstract of his
military records, eight letters, two certificates of excellence, one
website page, photos, a college transcript, and a statement in his own
behalf.
The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant entered active duty Air Force on 14 Dec 83 as a Medical
Administration Specialist. He enlisted for a 6-year period and served 2
years, 2 months, and 23 days.
A resume of the applicant’s airmen performance reports (APRs) follows (1-9
rating system):
CLOSEOUT DATE OVERALL RATING
13 Dec 84 8
13 Dec 85 5
The applicant received two Article 15s (one for wrongful use of words to
two airmen and unlawfully kicking another airman in the stomach with his
foot and the other for disrespectful language to a superior non-
commissioned officer and disorderly conduct of a nature to bring discredit
upon the armed forces).
The applicant was tried and found guilty by a General Court-Martial at
Homestead AFB, FL for the following uniform code of military justice (UCMJ)
violations:
- Article 112a - distributing and using marijuana and cocaine and
possessing cocaine
- Article 92 - possessing drug abuse paraphernalia
The applicant was sentenced to forfeiture of all pay and allowance,
received confinement for 4 years, and a BCD.
The applicant was discharged while serving in confinement at Ft
Leavenworth, KS on 3 Feb 87.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided a copy of an investigative report
pertaining to the former member (Identification Record Number
740674HA4)(Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFLOA/JAJM recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The applicant
entered a plea of guilty to five specifications of wrongful distribution of
cocaine and marijuana, wrongful possession of cocaine, wrongful use of
cocaine and marijuana, and wrongful possession of drug abuse paraphernalia
on diverse occasions between 11 Jun 85 and 10 Dec 85. The military judge
imposed the sentence of forfeiture of all pay and allowances, confinement
for 4 years, and a BCD. The convening authority approved the sentence as
adjudged and appellate review was completed.
The applicant is not contending that any specific actions have been taken
by reviewing authorities that require correction of his record. Thus, any
decision regarding his discharge status must be done as a matter of
clemency. The applicant, however, sets forth no basis for clemency other
than his prior service record and that, since his discharge, he has had
good jobs and pursued his education (even after his incarceration for
strangling his wife). He just states that he does his best to help those
in need and is willing to die for his country. While he may be commended
for these gestures, he provides no evidence to suggest that either the
findings of guilt or sentence were unjust.
The possession, use and distribution of cocaine and marijuana are serious
violations of the UCMJ. As such, a general court-martial was an
appropriate forum. There is no evidence of impropriety in the manner in
which the court-martial was conducted, and the applicant was afforded all
due process and appellate rights accorded by the law. He chose to plead
guilty to each specification, knowing full well the possible punishment he
could receive. Given the sentence he received, there is no evidence of a
clear error or injustice related to the sentence, specifically the punitive
discharge. The applicant has provided no compelling reason justifying his
request.
The complete evaluation of AFLOA/JAJM is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Dec
06 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has
not received a response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or an injustice. After careful consideration of the
available evidence, we found no indication that the actions taken to affect
his discharge were improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing
regulations in effect at the time. In addition, in view of the contents of
the FBI Identification Record we are not persuaded that the
characterization of the applicant’s discharge warrants an upgrade to
honorable on the basis of clemency. Having found no error or injustice
with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military
member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on his
request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006-03513
in Executive Session on 18 January 2007, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Teri G. Spoutz, Member
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Oct 06.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. FBI Investigative Report #740674HA4.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFLOA/JAJM, dated 20 Nov 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Dec 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00540
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-00540 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 20 AUGUST 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. The AFLOA/JAJM complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01174
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-01174 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an general (under honorable conditions) discharge. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former member of the Regular Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01928
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01928 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to general (under honorable conditions). On 18 May 1984, the Air Force Court of Military Review found the approved findings and the sentence correct in law and fact. We find no evidence which indicates the...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01693
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01693 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. Specifically, Section 1552 permits the correction of a record to reflect actions taken by reviewing authorities under the Uniform...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01421
On 6 Sep 89, the Air Force Court of Military Review found the findings and sentence correct in law and fact. The military judge weighed all the evidence and found the applicant guilty of two specifications and not guilty of the use of marijuana. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial conviction and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded the limitations set forth in...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01340
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01340 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 NOVEMBER 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03826
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-03826 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded to a general discharge. The complete JAJM evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 Feb 11, a copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01370
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-01370 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 NOVEMBER 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. The AFLOA/JAJM complete evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00924
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00924 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded. We find no evidence which indicates the applicants service characterization, which had its basis in his court-martial and was a part of the sentence of the military court, was improper or that it exceeded...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-02677
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-02677 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her bad conduct discharge (BCD) be upgraded. On 13 Sep 94, the Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the findings of guilty and the sentence in the applicant's case. We find no evidence that indicates the applicants service...