RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01639
INDEX CODE:
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 December 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The birth date in his military records be changed from 30 January 1931
to 29 January 1933.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Applicant provided no contentions.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of his DD Form 214
and a copy of his birth certificate.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 26 Jun 66 in the grade
of sergeant. He performed duties as a Senior Vehicle Operator and was
progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). On 30
Jun 70, while serving in the grade of staff sergeant he voluntarily
retired. He served four years and five days on active duty. He had
four prior regular enlistments. He was credited with 20 years and 21
days on active duty. He served 2 years, 4 months and 14 days of
foreign and/or SEA service. A Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code 2
was assigned. He was entitled to the Air Force Good Conduct Medal for
the period 24 Jun 63 – 23 Jun 66.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSO recommends denial. Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Military
Personnel Records System, Table A7.4, Rule 1, states that the
documentation required to correct the date of birth is the original or
certified copy of the birth certificate.
On 26 Jun 06, the applicant was informed of the required documentation
needed; however, he did not respond.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8
Sep 06 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this
office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We note,
the Air Force Instruction 36-3208, Military Personnel Records System,
Table A7.4, Rule 1, states that the documentation required to correct
the date of birth is the original or certified copy of the birth
certificate. The applicant was informed of this requirement; however,
he did not respond. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2006-01639 in Executive Session on 26 October 2006, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Panel Chair
Mr. Todd L. Schafer, Member
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Apr 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSO, dated 29 Aug 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Sep 06.
MICHAEL J. NOVEL
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00343
In a letter dated 15 March 2006, the applicant was instructed by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (HQ AFPC/DPSO) to provide either the original or a certified copy of her license and certificate of marriage so that they might update her records (Exhibit E). DPSO notes a letter was sent to the applicant requesting the required document and as of 9 May 2006, the applicant has not provided the necessary documentation. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02015
On 11 Aug 2005, the applicant’s commander notified the applicant that he was recommending he be separated from the Air Force under the provisions of AFPD 36-32 and AFI 36-3208 for fraudulent entry. On 18 Aug 2005, the applicant was discharged under AFI 36-3208, Fraudulent Entry into Military Service, Drug Abuse, with an uncharacterized entry- level separation, and an RE code of 2C. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02717
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his service characterization to honorable, but it was not reflected on his RE code, which he needs changed to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). The applicant has not provided any facts to warrant a change to his discharge or RE code. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01204
According to information provided by the Air Force, the applicant lost 8 days of leave at the end of FY 05. The applicant was able to take his post deployment recovery time (PDRT) upon return from his TDY. Enough time was available from the date the applicant returned from his TDY (1 Feb 05) until 30 Sep 05 (end of the FY) to use the remainder of his 8 days of use/lose leave.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03303
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: If his decoration had been processed by the suspense date of 2 Oct 05 and had not been lost, he would have met the cut-off score for the promotion to the grade of MSgt for the E7/05 cycle. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant’s commander provided an explanation of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01716
In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal statement, copy of statement Reason for Appeal of Referral EPR, AF IMT Form 910 Enlisted Performance Report, a Rebuttal to Referral Report Memorandum, a Letter of Appreciation, AF Form IMT 931, Performance Feedback Worksheet, five Letters of Recommendation and excerpts from her military personnel records. On 3 October 2005, an unsigned copy of the referral EPR dated 30 September 2005 was presented to her. After reviewing the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01476
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2006- 01476 in Executive Session on 20 September...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-03031
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03031 INDEX CODE: 131.00 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 APR 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect the rank of sergeant. He was given the instructor badge, and assigned to teach the technical school, and told while teaching, he would...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01228
We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. It is noted, at the time of the applicant’s retirement, the criteria established only chief master sergeants performing duties in the position of Chief Master Sergeant of the Air Force were qualified for LOM...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01121
According to information provided by the Air Force, the applicant actually lost 6 days (vice 18.5 days) of leave at the end of FY 05. While we note, the applicant has requested restoration of 18.5 days of leave, DPSO has indicated the applicant actually lost only 6 days of leave. NOVEL Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2006-01121 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of...