RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01435
INDEX CODE: 110.02
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE 07 NOV 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to
honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was young and did not realize what he was doing. He has grandchildren
in the Navy and the Army, but none in the Air Force.
In support of his appeal, he submits a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate
of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 January 1948 in the
grade of private for a period of three years.
On 28 Aug 50, applicant was convicted by civil authorities for drunk
driving and driving without a driver’s permit, on or about 2 Aug 50. At
trial, applicant pleaded guilty and was sentenced $130 fine or 165 days
confinement. Applicant paid the fine and the remainder of the sentence was
suspended on 17 Aug 50.
On 30 Aug 50, applicant submitted a request for dependency discharge under
the provisions of AFR 39-13.
On that same date, applicant’s commander recommended approval of his
request and noted that the applicant was not in confinement or under
charges. On 10 Nov 50, the discharge authority approved his request for
discharge.
On 17 November 1950, applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR
39-13, Enlisted Personnel-Discharge-Dependency or Hardship, with a general
(under honorable conditions) discharge. He was credited with 2 years, 9
months and 20 days of active duty service (excludes 15 days of lost time).
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, WV, indicated on 8 June 2006, that, on the basis of data
furnished, they are unable to locate an arrest record (Exhibit E).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. The applicant submitted a request to his
commanding officer requesting separation under the provisions of AFR 39-13
for dependency. The applicant’s commanding officer interviewed the
applicant and he disclosed that hardships had arisen at home and the
monthly contribution from his pay had been inadequate to provide for his
family. The commander thought the applicant should be returned to civilian
life in order to alleviate undesirable conditions existing at home. The
discharge authority approved the separation and applicant was given a
general discharge.
DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel
records, the discharge was consistent with requirements of the discharge
regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21
July 2006 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The applicant has requested that his
general discharge be upgraded to honorable. After careful consideration of
the evidence of record, we found no evidence that the actions taken to
effect the applicant’s discharge were improper or contrary to the
provisions of the governing regulations in effect at the time of
separation. The Board noted the applicant was convicted by civil
authorities for drunk driving and driving without a permit and was fined
$130 with confinement. At that same time, applicant requested separation
based on hardship, due to his mother experiencing financial difficulties
after the death of his father. Applicant’s commander approved his request;
however, recommended a general (under honorable conditions) discharge.
Nevertheless, in view of the absence of any derogatory information on the
FBI Report, his otherwise honorable service, and since its been over 50
years since his separation, we believe that an upgrade of the
characterization of his discharge to fully honorable is warranted on the
basis of clemency. Accordingly, we recommend the applicant’s records be
corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 17 November 1950, he was
honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge Certificate.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-
01435 in Executive Session on 6 September 2006, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
Ms. Patricia J. Zarodkiewicz, Member
Ms. Dorothy P. Loeb, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Jul 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 17 Jul 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jul 06.
Exhibit E. FBI Report.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-01435
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that on
17 November 1950, he was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable
Discharge Certificate.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01915
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01946
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01946 INDEX CODE: 110.00, 100.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 27 DECEMBER 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. The DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00454
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS reviewed this application and indicated that there was no documentation in applicant’s master personnel records relating to the reason for discharge or the discharge process. We find no evidence of error in this case and after...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02771
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was told by his commanding officer and base commander that he was receiving an AFR 39-16 undesirable discharge due to a civil court action. Additionally, applicant had the following derogatory information on file in the master personnel record: (1) On 28 May 1962, applicant received an Article 15 for being found guilty of hit and run by the Biloxi Police. The discharge authority approved the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03896
On 28 Jul 83, the base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient and recommended applicant’s unconditional waiver be accepted and that he be discharged with an under other than honorable conditions discharge without probation and rehabilitation. On 5 Aug 83, applicant was discharged in the grade of airman basic, under the provisions of AFR 39-10, for a pattern of misconduct - discreditable involvement with military or civil authorities, with an under other than...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01960
Based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00723
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00723 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEP 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. They found the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00651
Additionally, the applicant’s base driving privileges were suspended. In addition, based on his overall record of service, the contents of the FBI Report of Investigation, and the absence of evidence related to his post-service activities and accomplishments, we are not persuaded that an upgrade of the characterization of his discharge is warranted on the basis of clemency. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Mar 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00910
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 5 May 06, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice;...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00008
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, WV, has provided applicant’s arrest record which is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A copy of the FBI arrest record was forwarded to applicant on 27 February...