Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01054
Original file (BC-2006-01054.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2006-01054
            INDEX CODE:  110.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  7 OCT 07

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general  (under  honorable  conditions)  discharge  be  upgraded  to  an
honorable discharge.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His characterization  of  discharge  is  preventing  him  from  acquiring  a
security license.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a  personal  statement  and
character reference letters.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 12 December 1980  in  the
grade of airman basic.  He  was  progressively  promoted  to  the  grade  of
airman first class, having assumed that grade effective and with a  date  of
rank of 12 December 1981.  On 7 December 1983, the  applicant  was  notified
by his commander of his intent to recommend he be discharged  from  the  Air
Force under the provisions of AFR  39-10,  Misconduct  –  Drug  Abuse.   The
specific reason for this  action  was  that  he  received  four  letters  of
reprimand (LORs)  for  writing  various  checks  without  sufficient  funds,
failure  to  pay  just  debts,  and  for  a  positive  urinalysis  for   THC
(tetrahydrocannabinol - active component in  marijuana).  He  also  received
nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, of the  Uniform  Code  of  Military
Justice  (UCMJ)  for  violation  of  Article  134  -  the  wrongful  use  of
marijuana.  The punishment imposed consisted of eight  days  extra  duty,  a
suspended reduction to the grade of airman and forfeiture  of  $75  pay  per
month for two months.  He was advised of  his  rights  in  this  matter  and
acknowledged receipt of  the  discharge  notification  on  that  same  date.
After consulting with counsel, the applicant  submitted  statements  in  his
own behalf.  In a legal review of the case  file,  the  acting  staff  judge
advocate  found  the  case  legally  sufficient  and   recommended   he   be
discharged.  On 28 December 1983, the  discharge  authority  concurred  with
the recommendations and directed  that  he  be  discharged  with  a  general
discharge,  without  probation  and  rehabilitation.   The   applicant   was
discharged on 29 December 1983.  He served 3 years and  18  days  on  active
duty.

Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation  (FBI),
Clarksburg, West Virginia, was unable to  identify  with  an  arrest  record
pertaining to the applicant (Exhibit C).

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial.  DPPRS states based on  the  documentation  on
file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with  the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and  was
within the discretion of the discharge authority.  The  applicant  also  did
not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices  that  occurred
in the discharge processing.  Nor did he provide facts warranting  a  change
to his character of service.

The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 26 May 2006, a copy of the Air Force  evaluation  was  forwarded  to  the
applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E).   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.




3.  After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we  see  no  evidence
to show the applicant’s discharge was erroneous or unjust.   However,  while
the discharge may have been appropriate at the time, we believe  an  upgrade
is warranted in this case.  We note the applicant’s FBI report  contains  no
entries prior or subsequent to his enlistment in the Air Force.  In view  of
the  applicant’s  apparent  successful  transition  to  civilian  life,   as
evidenced by his post-service accomplishments, the Board is of  the  opinion
that upgrading the applicant’s discharge to  honorable,  based  on  clemency
would be appropriate.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected  to  show  that  on  29  December  1983,  he  was
honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2006-
01054 in Executive Session on 18 July 2006, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                 Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Member
                 Ms. Karen A. Holloman, Member

The Board voted to correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 May 2006, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Negative FBI Report.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 9 May 2006.
   Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 May 2006.




                 KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
                 Panel Chair




AFBCMR BC-2006-01054





MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to   , be corrected to show that on 29 December 1983, he was
honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.




            JOE G. LINEBERGER
            Director
            Air Force Review Boards Agency




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02070

    Original file (BC-2006-02070.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jul 2006 and 2 Aug 2006, for review and comment within 30 days. Based on the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02909

    Original file (BC-2004-02909.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In a legal review of the discharge case file dated 7 December 1987, the Combat Support Group Judge Advocate office found the file was legally sufficient and recommended that the applicant be separated from the service with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, and the discharge was within the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02134

    Original file (BC-2006-02134.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 8 Dec 67, the applicant, then an Airman (E- 2), was charged with four specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, UMCJ. The discharge authority approved his request for discharge for the good of the service and directed that he be discharged with an undesirable discharge. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 26 Jul 06.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02195

    Original file (BC-2006-02195.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He had never been in trouble before and had good service time until the incident. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F). Exhibit C. FBI Report.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01918

    Original file (BC-2006-01918.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00714

    Original file (BC-2005-00714.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was discharged effective 24 July 1970 with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. He served 3 years, 7 months, and 14 days of active duty. On 7 December 1973, the Air Force Discharge Review Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his characterization of discharge to honorable.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00434

    Original file (BC-2006-00434.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00434 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JUL 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03608

    Original file (BC-2006-03608.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 24 Jun 96, applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his under other than honorable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. After review of the evidence of record, the AFDRB concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. The Board further...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01109

    Original file (BC-2004-01109.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 20 January 1984, the applicant failed to report for work. The discharge authority approved the recommendation on 16 May 1984, and directed that the applicant be discharged from the service and furnished a General Discharge certificate. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 16 November 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Ms. Marilyn M. Thomas, Vice Chair Ms....

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00907

    Original file (BC-2005-00907.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00907 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 SEPTEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. He served 1 year, 2 months, and 12 days total active service with 216 days of lost time. ...