RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01054
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 OCT 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an
honorable discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His characterization of discharge is preventing him from acquiring a
security license.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement and
character reference letters.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 12 December 1980 in the
grade of airman basic. He was progressively promoted to the grade of
airman first class, having assumed that grade effective and with a date of
rank of 12 December 1981. On 7 December 1983, the applicant was notified
by his commander of his intent to recommend he be discharged from the Air
Force under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Misconduct – Drug Abuse. The
specific reason for this action was that he received four letters of
reprimand (LORs) for writing various checks without sufficient funds,
failure to pay just debts, and for a positive urinalysis for THC
(tetrahydrocannabinol - active component in marijuana). He also received
nonjudicial punishment under Article 15, of the Uniform Code of Military
Justice (UCMJ) for violation of Article 134 - the wrongful use of
marijuana. The punishment imposed consisted of eight days extra duty, a
suspended reduction to the grade of airman and forfeiture of $75 pay per
month for two months. He was advised of his rights in this matter and
acknowledged receipt of the discharge notification on that same date.
After consulting with counsel, the applicant submitted statements in his
own behalf. In a legal review of the case file, the acting staff judge
advocate found the case legally sufficient and recommended he be
discharged. On 28 December 1983, the discharge authority concurred with
the recommendations and directed that he be discharged with a general
discharge, without probation and rehabilitation. The applicant was
discharged on 29 December 1983. He served 3 years and 18 days on active
duty.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI),
Clarksburg, West Virginia, was unable to identify with an arrest record
pertaining to the applicant (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states based on the documentation on
file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was
within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant also did
not submit any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred
in the discharge processing. Nor did he provide facts warranting a change
to his character of service.
The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 26 May 2006, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we see no evidence
to show the applicant’s discharge was erroneous or unjust. However, while
the discharge may have been appropriate at the time, we believe an upgrade
is warranted in this case. We note the applicant’s FBI report contains no
entries prior or subsequent to his enlistment in the Air Force. In view of
the applicant’s apparent successful transition to civilian life, as
evidenced by his post-service accomplishments, the Board is of the opinion
that upgrading the applicant’s discharge to honorable, based on clemency
would be appropriate.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 29 December 1983, he was
honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-
01054 in Executive Session on 18 July 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
Mr. Wallace F. Beard Jr., Member
Ms. Karen A. Holloman, Member
The Board voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 May 2006, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Negative FBI Report.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 9 May 2006.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 26 May 2006.
KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-01054
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to , be corrected to show that on 29 December 1983, he was
honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge certificate.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02070
DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jul 2006 and 2 Aug 2006, for review and comment within 30 days. Based on the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02909
In a legal review of the discharge case file dated 7 December 1987, the Combat Support Group Judge Advocate office found the file was legally sufficient and recommended that the applicant be separated from the service with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge. DPPRS states based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, and the discharge was within the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02134
On 8 Dec 67, the applicant, then an Airman (E- 2), was charged with four specifications of larceny, in violation of Article 121, UMCJ. The discharge authority approved his request for discharge for the good of the service and directed that he be discharged with an undesirable discharge. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 26 Jul 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02195
He had never been in trouble before and had good service time until the incident. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit F). Exhibit C. FBI Report.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01918
Therefore, based on the available evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00714
The applicant was discharged effective 24 July 1970 with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. He served 3 years, 7 months, and 14 days of active duty. On 7 December 1973, the Air Force Discharge Review Board considered and denied the applicant’s request to upgrade his characterization of discharge to honorable.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00434
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00434 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NOT INDICATED HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JUL 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Therefore, based on the evidence of record, we find no basis upon which to favorably...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03608
On 24 Jun 96, applicant applied to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) requesting his under other than honorable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. After review of the evidence of record, the AFDRB concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process. The Board further...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01109
On 20 January 1984, the applicant failed to report for work. The discharge authority approved the recommendation on 16 May 1984, and directed that the applicant be discharged from the service and furnished a General Discharge certificate. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 16 November 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36- 2603: Ms. Marilyn M. Thomas, Vice Chair Ms....
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00907
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00907 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 SEPTEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. He served 1 year, 2 months, and 12 days total active service with 216 days of lost time. ...