RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00177
INDEX CODE: 108.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 JUL 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Seventeen (17) days of leave be added to his current leave balance.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His request to reinstate 17 days of leave was not approved and did not meet
the criteria for Special Leave Accrual (SLA). He forecasted leave in
December 2005 [sic] and was unable to take leave due to required training.
He also projected leave on several different occasions from February
through July 2005 and was asked to reschedule due to the sections manning
and deployment commitments. He was then deployed on short notice -
temporary duty (TDY) to Anderson, AFB Guam. He was deployed from 27 April
through 10 September 2005 in support of PACOM Bomber Forward Force, AEF 8.
As with any deployment, his leave projections were cancelled. Since he did
not return from TDY until 10 September 2005 and with the required in
processing and allotted time off, he was only able to take two days of
leave at the end of September, with the new fiscal year beginning
1 October. Therefore, he lost the 17 remaining days of leave. He believes
the circumstance in which his leave was lost was out of his control and
feels that the leave should be restored.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 3 December 1991, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force in the
grade of airman basic. He continued to reenlist contracting his last
enlistment on 8 December 2000. He is currently serving in the grade of
technical sergeant (TSgt) effective and with a date of rank (DOR) of 1
October 2005.
The applicant was deployed to Anderson AFB, Guam, from 27 April to 10
September 2005.
The applicant lost 17 days of leave at the end of Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05).
On 2 November 2005, the applicant requested reinstatement of 19 days of
leave.
The Commander of the 509th Maintenance Squadron and the Commander of the
509th Maintenance Group indicated the applicant was deployed in support of
PACOM Bomber Forward Force, AEF 8 and approved of his request for SLA.
On 15 December 2005, the 509th MSS/DPM advised the applicant that his
request for SLA was disapproved. They indicated he did not meet the
criteria for SLA.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPF recommended denial indicating AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program,
note below paragraph 10.9.7, states in part a member’s application must
clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the
member’s lost leave. Additionally, paragraph 4.1.4, Use of Leave,
recommends that members be given the opportunity to take at least one leave
period of 14 consecutive days or more each FY and encourages them to use
the 30 days of leave they accrue each year. Based on the length of time
prior to the deployment and the applicant stating that he chose time off
after his deployment rather than use accrued leave, denial of his request
to restore 17 days leave would be appropriate. The applicant had ample
time to use accrued leave.
The evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 17 February 2006, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. The applicant contends that he lost 17
days of leave due to short notice of a TDY to Anderson, AFB, Guam. The
Board notes based on statements submitted with this appeal, it appears that
the applicant did receive short notice (approximately 14 days) before the
TDY departure date. Therefore, the Board is of the opinion, that the
applicant did not have the opportunity to use his projected leave. In view
of the above finding, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected to
the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that seventeen (17) days of leave be
added to his current leave balance.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-
00177 in Executive Session on 23 March 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Michael J. Maglio, Panel Chair
Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member
The Board voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Jan 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPF, dated 9 Feb 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 06.
MICHAEL J. MAGLIO
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2006-00177
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to , be corrected to show that seventeen (17) days of leave be
added to his current leave balance.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03943
___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was unable to take 30 days leave during FY 05 due to AEF deployment, TDYs, exercises and upgrade training. AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, Note below Para 10.9.7, states, in part, that member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01547
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01547 INDEX NUMBER: 121.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 19.5 days of leave be restored to his leave balance. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF recommends 17.5 days of leave be restored to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02832
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02832 INDEX CODE: 121.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: Mar 23, 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All, or some, of the 20 days leave he lost during FY 2005 be restored. Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03890
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-03890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to reflect he was awarded the following: a. Vietnam Service Medal (VSM). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He served in Guam with the 3960th Strategic Wing for 176...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00326
AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, note below paragraph 10.9.7, states in part a member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. The applicant did not use any leave during FY05. The Board notes that post- deployment recovery time is not a valid reason for reinstatement of lost leave when accrued leave could have been taken in its place.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00815
He used six days of leave during FY05. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPF recommends partial relief by restoring 17 days of leave. They recommend 17 days of leave be restored because the applicant returned in time from his short-notice deployment to take seven days of leave before FY05 ended.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03494
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, states in part that a member who is not eligible for Special Leave Accrual (SLA) can request recovery of lost days, but a member’s application for lost leave must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. According to HQ AFPC/DPF (Exhibit B), the applicant lost 7 days of leave at the end of FY05 [1 Oct 04 - 30 Sep 05]....
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01001
His wing commander agreed that he should be restored 10 days of leave and approved a Special Leave Accrual (SLA) request. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states that he was deployed on Contingency Exercise Deployment (CED) orders prior to starting his already- approved ten days of use/lose leave for FY12. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01888
Applicant requests 60 days of leave be restored to his leave account and he be entitled to sell his leave upon his 1 May 2005 retirement. The Air Force has recommended restoring 60 days to the applicant’s leave account. In reviewing the applicant’s MMPA, DFAS determined, however, that the applicant’s account should have reflected 26.5 days of leave at the time of his retirement.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02358
On 1 Sep 05, he showed his Leave and Earnings Statement (LES) to Finance; it reflected 20 days use/lose. According to HQ AFPC/DPSOO (Exhibit B), the applicant carried forward 69 days of leave at the beginning of Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) (9 days of leave were previously restored via SLA). We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its...