Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03494
Original file (BC-2005-03494.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03494
            INDEX CODE:  121.03
      XXXXXXX    COUNSEL:  None

      XXXXXXX    HEARING DESIRED:  No

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  19 May 07

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Seven (7) days of  leave  lost  during  Fiscal  Year  2005  (FY05)  be
restored.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was deployed for a total of 53 days to MacDill AFB, FL, from  8 Sep
05 to 30 Oct 05.  He was unable to use  his  excess  leave  before  he
departed    on    his     deployment     due     to     pre-deployment
preparations/training, a Red Flag exercise and  other  mission-related
requirements.  His deployment was cut short due to a change in manning
requirements.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is  at  Exhibit
A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, states in part that a member  who
is not eligible for Special Leave Accrual (SLA) can  request  recovery
of lost days, but a member’s application for lost leave  must  clearly
establish that an error or injustice  by  the  Air  Force  caused  the
member’s lost leave.  The AFI also recommends that  members  be  given
the opportunity to take at least one leave period  of  14  consecutive
days or more each fiscal year.  Paragraph 4.1.4. notes  that  Congress
intended for members to use their leave as accruing and did not intend
for members to accrue large leave balances expressly  for  payment  of
accrued leave.

According to HQ AFPC/DPF (Exhibit B), the applicant  lost  7  days  of
leave at the end of FY05 [1 Oct 04 - 30 Sep 05].  He  carried  forward
60 days of leave at the beginning of FY05.  He earned 30 days and used
23 days of leave during FY05.

_________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPF cites AFI 36-3003 and  recommends  the  appeal  be  denied
because it appears the applicant waited until the end  of  the  fiscal
year to use all of his accrued leave.  Therefore, the  loss  of  leave
was not an error or injustice caused by the Air Force.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant contends he used 18 days of leave by  1 May  05  and  an
additional five days over a four-week period.  He was unable  to  take
leave during July because he  was  preparing  for  his  deployment  to
MacDill and his squadron was unwilling to grant  leave  with  the  Red
Flag exercise approaching.  He has deployed in past years with part of
a deployment in one fiscal year and finishing on the next fiscal year.
 He has never had a problem receiving credit for lost leave days  when
he was deployed.  Therefore, he knew he would receive the  lost  seven
days when he returned from the MacDill deployment.   However,  through
no fault of his own, the deployment was cut short because he  was  not
required to stay the entire 120 days and he  was  able  to  return  to
Nellis after 53 days.  He could not  go  through  normal  channels  to
receive the lost leave because he did not fill at least 60 days of the
deployment.  If he had known he was not needed on the deployment after
53 days and would not be given the chance to recover the  lost  leave,
he would have pushed the issue with his squadron.   His  other  option
would have been to ask permission to delay his deployment report  date
after the Red Flag exercise so he could have used his last seven  days
before 1 Oct 05.

A complete copy of applicant’s response is at Exhibit D.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was timely filed.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice to warrant granting the  requested
relief.  We are persuaded the applicant managed his leave properly but
was prevented from using the seven days in  question  due  to  various
mission requirements.  Further,  the  unexpected  curtailment  of  the
MacDill deployment  may  have  prevented  him  from  obtaining  relief
through normal administrative channels.  We  therefore  recommend  his
records be corrected to show that seven days of leave  were  added  to
his current leave account.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that seven (7) days  of
leave were added to his current leave account.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  this  application  in
Executive Session on 12 April 2006 under  the  provisions  of  AFI 36-
2603:

                 Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
                 Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr., Member
                 Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member

All members  voted  to  correct  the  records,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR  Docket  Number  BC-
2005-03494 was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 Nov 05, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Letter, HQ AFPC/DPF, dated 13 Dec 05.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Dec 05.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, Applicant, dated 2 Jan 06.





                                   KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
                                   Panel Chair


AFBCMR BC-2005-03494




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to XXXXXXX, XXXXXXX, be corrected to show that seven
(7) days of leave were added to his current leave account.





   JOE G. LINEBERGER

   Director

   Air Force Review Boards Agency


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00815

    Original file (BC-2006-00815.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He used six days of leave during FY05. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPF recommends partial relief by restoring 17 days of leave. They recommend 17 days of leave be restored because the applicant returned in time from his short-notice deployment to take seven days of leave before FY05 ended.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03511

    Original file (BC-2005-03511.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    AFI 36-3003, para 4, Military Leave Program, Use of Leave, recommends members be given the opportunity to take at least one leave period of 14 consecutive days or more each FY and encourage them to use the 30 days of leave they accrue each year. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPSFOC recommended restoration of 22 days of leave, stating, in part, that finance was correct in stating that as long as the applicant started his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03268

    Original file (BC-2005-03268.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. The Board is of the opinion the applicant is ultimately responsible for the management of his leave account and, he has not provided any supporting documentation showing the Air...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00326

    Original file (BC-2006-00326.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, note below paragraph 10.9.7, states in part a member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. The applicant did not use any leave during FY05. The Board notes that post- deployment recovery time is not a valid reason for reinstatement of lost leave when accrued leave could have been taken in its place.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03371

    Original file (BC-2005-03371.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF recommends the application be denied, and states, in part, that the loss of leave was not an error or injustice caused by the Air Force. The applicant decided to report for duty at Wright-Patterson AFB instead of using his accrued leave, resulting in his loss of 6 days of leave at the end of FY05. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03070

    Original file (BC-2005-03070.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    She earned 30 days of leave during FY05 and used 10 days. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPF states, AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, para 10.9.7, states in part member’s application must clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused the member’s lost leave. Applicant requests that twenty (20) days of leave be restored to her leave account.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01888

    Original file (BC-2005-01888.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Applicant requests 60 days of leave be restored to his leave account and he be entitled to sell his leave upon his 1 May 2005 retirement. The Air Force has recommended restoring 60 days to the applicant’s leave account. In reviewing the applicant’s MMPA, DFAS determined, however, that the applicant’s account should have reflected 26.5 days of leave at the time of his retirement.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00203

    Original file (BC-2006-00203.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00203 INDEX CODE: 108.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JUL 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Nine (9) days of leave be added to his current leave balance. Additionally, paragraph 4.1.4, Use of Leave, recommends that members be given the opportunity to take at least one leave period...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03806

    Original file (BC-2005-03806.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03806 INDEX CODE: 121.03 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 JUN 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Six (6) days of leave be restored to his leave account as of 2 Oct 05. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03510

    Original file (BC-2005-03510.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to information provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, the applicant lost 5 days of leave at the end of FY 05. Due to deployment, he was authorized to carry over 2.5 days of accrued leave. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance;...