RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03781
INDEX CODE: 106.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 Jun 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His 1963 general discharge be changed to honorable.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was caught wearing white socks with his uniform and given an
Article 15. He was reduced in rank and character of discharge when he
was separated from the service. He had no other discrepancies in his
service. He was given the option of going to Alaska and extending or
taking a general discharge.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 Aug 60, and was
assigned to the 686th Aircraft Control and Warning Squadron (686 ACWS)
at Walker AFB, NM, as an administrative clerk/specialist.
On 1 May 61, the applicant received an Article 15 for being disorderly
in the barracks on 30 Apr 61. He was sentenced to perform hard labor
for 14 days.
On 6 Nov 61, the applicant was counseled by the squadron commander for
failing to obey a direct order from a commissioned officer.
On 8 Nov 61, he was counseled regarding the military system of
authority and seniority. He was again counseled on 9 Nov 61 for his
disrespect towards an NCO, and his stating at that time that he was
being persecuted and had an uncontrollable desire to inflict injury on
or to kill the NCO.
On 20 Nov 61, because of his frequent use of profanity and
obscenities, the applicant was moved to another section to be under
the direct supervision of a more senior NCO.
According to Special Order A-7, dated 1 Jun 62, the applicant was
promoted to the permanent grade of airman second class, effective and
with a date of rank (DOR) of 1 Jun 62.
During the month of Sep 62, the applicant was negligent in duty
performance, and was rude and disobedient to his supervisors.
On 22 Sep 62, he was apprehended by the base police for reckless
driving.
On 26 Sep 62, the applicant received an Article 15 for failing to go
to his appointed place of duty on 21 Sep 62. He was demoted to airman
third class. He provided no matters for consideration and did not
appeal.
On 20 Nov 62, the applicant was found guilty by summary court-martial
for treating a staff sergeant with contempt on or about 16 Nov 62, by
saying “I wish I was making you mad enough to strike me,” or words to
that effect. He was restricted to the base for seven days and
forfeited $10.00.
On 16 Apr 63, the applicant was reduced from airman third class to
airman basic with 30 days of correctional custody for using
disrespectful language to his superior NCO on 12 Apr 63.
On 25 Apr 63, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent to
recommend discharge for unsuitability (apathy and defective attitude).
The applicant submitted a statement in his behalf. On 6 May 63, an
evaluation officer interviewed the applicant, noted his file revealed
a lengthy history of nonconformity to military standards, and
recommended a general discharge. The discharge authority approved the
applicant’s general discharge on 7 May 63.
On 10 May 63, the applicant was discharged in the grade of airman
basic with a general characterization of service for
ineptitude/unsuitability after 2 years, 8 months and 12 days of active
service.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Washington, D.C., indicated that, on the basis of the data furnished,
they were unable to locate an arrest record (Exhibit C).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial, contending the applicant’s discharge
was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation and within the discharge authority’s discretion.
The applicant submitted no evidence or identified any errors or
injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. He provided no
facts warranting a change to his reenlistment code.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 13 Jan 06 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit
E). On 30 Jan 06, the applicant was invited to provide post-service
information within 20 days in support of his appeal (Exhibit F).
The applicant provided two responses. He claims he never used
profanity in his life, never used drugs or alcohol other than
socially, or been charged with any crime. He claims the incidents of
misconduct in the Air Force never happened but were made up by his 1st
Sergeant, who disliked him. He gives his version of events. In a
second response, the applicant submitted post service information,
indicating he earned a bachelor’s degree in public administration and
worked for the XXXXXXX Fire Department for 30 years. He provides
several certificates of fire service achievement and training.
Complete copies of the applicant’s responses, with attachments are at
Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading the
applicant’s discharge to honorable. No evidence has been presented
which would lead us to believe his discharge was improper or contrary
to the directive under which it was effected. The applicant’s record
of misbehavior appears to support the characterization of service he
received at the time of his discharge, and we cannot determine with
certainty that the actions taken against him were the result of his
1st Sergeant’s dislike as the applicant contends. Nevertheless, in
view of the applicant’s successful transition to civilian life, as
evidenced by the post-service documentation he has provided, and the
FBI report indicating he has been a law-biding citizen, we conclude
that upgrading his discharge to honorable on the basis of clemency
would be appropriate. Accordingly, we recommended that the
applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 10 May 1963, he
was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge
certificate.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 23 May 2006 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Cathlynn B. Sparks, Panel Chair
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Member
Ms. Josephine L. Davis, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-03781 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Dec 05, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Negative FBI Report - No Arrest Record.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 10 Jan 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Jan 06.
Exhibit F Letter, AFBCMR, dated 30 Jan 06.
Exhibit G. Letters, Applicant, dated 8 & 10 Feb 06, w/atchs.
CATHLYNN B. SPARKS
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-03781
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 10 May 1963, he
was honorably discharged and furnished an Honorable Discharge
certificate.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
The diagnosis was defective attitude with no evidence of classifiable psychiatric disease. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his general discharge should be upgraded to honorable. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Aug 02 Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 6 Sep 02.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00056
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00056 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 8 May 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. They concluded that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03022
On 16 Apr 62, the squadron commander notified the applicant that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force for a civil court conviction. Applicant was discharged on 26 Apr 62, in the grade of airman basic (E-1), under the provisions of AFM 39-22, with separation designation number 284 (Involuntarily discharged for misconduct, civil court disposition, processed by waiver of entitlement to a board hearing), and was issued an under other than honorable conditions (undesirable)...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00040
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Most of the applicant’s records were destroyed in the Jul 73 fire at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC). Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report, which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS provided their rationale for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01431
Applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant recommended denial noting the applicant was administratively discharged in 1963 for unsuitability due to passive- aggressive personality disorder (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - I (DSM-I). The DVA has granted service-connected disability compensation based on that psychiatrist's...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03944
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03944 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 30 JUNE 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to general. On 13 Sep 54, the wing commander recommended the applicant’s request for discharge be accepted and he be separated with an...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02681
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02681 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 5 Mar 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason (Misconduct-Drug Use) for his 1983 honorable discharge be removed from his DD Form 214. On 18 Nov 83, the applicant was notified of his commander’s intent...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02618
He retired in 1974. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPO advises that, based on the applicant’s date of rank (DOR) as a captain, 14 Mar 67, he was eligible to meet the Fiscal Year 1974 (FY74) Temporary Major Selection Board, which convened on 17 Sep 73. If he had been notified of his selection for promotion, he would certainly have delayed his retirement to accept the promotion.
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-03209
Service members, who earned the Armed Forces Expeditionary medal for service in Vietnam between 1 Jul 58 and 3 Jul 65, may elect to receive the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) instead of the AFEM. After a thorough review of the evidence presented and the service members military personnel records, we believe a reasonable basis exists to conclude the applicant served in Vietnam. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03791
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03791 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: May 28, 2008 _____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. He was informed at discharge, that after a period of time, he could have his discharge certificate upgraded to...