RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02636
INDEX CODE: 108.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 February 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her records be changed to show a disability discharge due to service
aggravation rated at 100%, she be awarded the pay grade of senior airman (E-
4), and she receive retroactive pay and entitlements.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She suffered a sexual assault prior to entering the service causing a post
traumatic stress disorder. Her preexisting disability did not prevent her
from entering the Air Force; however, her condition was repeatedly and
severely aggravated while serving on active duty. Therefore, she should be
awarded a permanent Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) disability rating
at 100% to cover all mental and physical medical conditions. In addition,
she is entitled to promotion to senior airman (E-4) because she was
discharged 14 days prior to receiving the promotion.
In support of her application, the applicant provides a personal statement;
certificates of recognition and appreciation; and her DD Form 214,
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. The applicant’s
complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 2 December 1998, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the
age of 24 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of six years.
She was trained as a Supply Journeyman and was progressively promoted to
the grade of airman first class (E-3). She received one enlisted
performance report for the period 2 December 1998 through 15 July 2000,
with an overall rating of “5.” On 31 March 1999, the applicant received
non-judicial punishment for failure to obey a lawful general regulation by
wrongfully going to a hotel in the local area. Her punishment was
reduction in grade to airman, suspended until 30 September 1999, after
which time it was remitted without further action.
In March 1999, the applicant was seen in the mental health clinic for
depressed mood and anxiety diagnosed as Adjustment Disorder with Mixed
Anxiety and Depressed Mood. In May 2000, she experienced a panic attack
after donning a gas mask and was referred to the mental health clinic for
evaluation and treatment. The evaluation uncovered a prior to service
sexual assault at age 20, a strong fear of confinement and smothering since
childhood, and reoccurring episodes of depression during her teens and
early twenties which were not reported by the applicant at the time of her
enlistment exam. She was referred to rape counseling and therapy to treat
her apparent phobia to gas masks. Subsequently, she was diagnosed with
recurrent Major Depression beginning in adolescence that was not aggravated
by service, and post traumatic stress disorder, delayed onset, caused by
the pre-service sexual assault. Following treatment, her psychiatrist
determined her conditions would not improve sufficiently to become world-
wide qualified for duty and referred her for a Medical Evaluation Board
(MEB).
On 16 January 2001, the MEB diagnosed the applicant with Major Depression,
Recurrent, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The MEB referred the
applicant’s case to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). The PEB findings,
dated 25 January 2001, indicated the applicant suffered from two
interrelated medical conditions, both existed prior to service (EPTS) and
not permanently aggravated through military service. The PEB found the
applicant unfit because both conditions are incompatible with the rigors of
military service and her conditions were not compensable or ratable. The
PEB recommended the applicant be discharged under provisions other than
Title 10 United States Code, Chapter 61 (i.e. without disability
compensation).
On 14 March 2001, the applicant was separated with an honorable discharge
with a separation code of JFM (disability existed prior to service) and a
reentry code of 2Q (personnel medically retired or discharged). She had
served 2 years, 3 months and 14 days on active duty.
DVA Rating Decisions, dated 10 August 2001 and 30 October 2003, indicates
that the applicant was denied service connected disability for major
depressive disorder associated with post traumatic stress disorder and fear
of confinement/smothering.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the
applicant’s records is warranted. The BCMR Medical Consultant states the
preponderance of the evidence does not support the applicant’s request.
It is the opinion of the BCMR Medical Consultant that action and
disposition in this case were proper and equitable reflecting compliance
with Air Force directives that implement the law. The BCMR Medical
Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21
September 2005 for review and response within 30 days. As of this date,
this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case and do not find that
it supports a determination that the applicant’s discharge from the Air
Force was in error or unjust. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted;
however, we believe the detailed comments provided by the BCMR Medical
Consultant accurately address her allegations. In view of this finding, we
agree with the opinions and recommendation of the BCMR Medical Consultant
and we adopt his rationale as a basis for our conclusion that the applicant
has not been the victim of either an error or an injustice. In the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought in this appeal.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 17 November 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. James W. Russell III, Panel Chair
Ms. Kathleen B. O’Sullivan, Member
Ms. LeLoy W. Cottrell, Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2004-02636 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Sep 04, with attachments.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 19 Sep 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Sep 05.
JAMES W. RUSSELL III
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00300
Although the mental health records are not available for review (only limited entries in the main service medical record), the Medical Evaluation Board (MEB) narrative summary dated June 28, 2002 provides the most complete psychiatric summary available in the case file while she was on active duty. Had the Physical Evaluation Board concluded that service aggravated her condition, rating deductions for existing prior to service symptoms and for non-compensable personality...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01057
The Medical Consultant notes based on the provided evidence, the applicant was the victim of a sexual assault in Jul 09 and she requested and was granted a voluntary discharge from the Air Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, for Miscellaneous Reasons. The complete Clinical Psychology Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant notes that she was proud of the time spent in the Air Force and had the circumstances been...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03399
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant was discharged due to depression and post traumatic stress disorder which required hospitalization. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 5 March...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01045
We are not persuaded by the evidence presented that the uncharacterized entry-level separation received by the former member should be changed. Rather, as was noted by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service is used in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of service at the time separation proceedings were, for whatever reason, initiated. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01019
She received an RE code of 2Q “Personnel Medically Retired or Discharged”. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Sep 07, for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however; we agree with the opinion and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02530
On 14 February 2001, Officials within the Office of the Secretary of the Air Force determined the applicant was physically unfit for continued military service due to a physical disability which existed prior to military service (EPTS) and directed the applicant be discharged without disability benefits. The BCMR Medical Consultant states the applicant was discharged for recurrent major depression that existed prior to service. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01766
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01766 COUNSEL: HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be medically retired due to severely exacerbated Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). An exacerbation, or acute behavioral flare-up of a mental condition, when under a given stressor, does not automatically incur or represent a permanent worsening of...
AF | BCMR | CY2009 | BC-2008-03027
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the evaluation prepared by the BCMR Medical Consultant, which is attached at Exhibit C. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the applicant’s name be placed on the Temporary Disability Retired List (TDRL), with a 50 percent disability rating, for anxiety disorder, under Veterans Administrative Schedule for Rating Disabilities...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2009-02261
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The medical board determined that her disability resulted from her military service; however, this was not reflected on her discharge paperwork. On 18 Apr 03, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) found the applicant unfit for further service and recommended her discharge under other than Chapter 61, Title 10 United States Code (USC) at the rating of 10 percent, but without compensation (as...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02997
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02997 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 MARCH 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation code of “JFL” and reenlistment eligibility (RE) of “2Q” be changed to allow eligibility to reenlist. The MEB recommended referral to a Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). ...