Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03418
Original file (BC-2005-03418.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-03418
                                             INDEX CODE:  100.00
      XXXXXXX                           COUNSEL:  NONE

      XXXXXXX                           HEARING DESIRED:  NO


MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  11 May 2007


________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from  Active  Duty,  be
changed to reflect that he completed the Air National Guard  (ANG)  Regional
Equipment  Operators  Training  School  (REOTS)   and   Accumulation   Point
Management Training.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

All of his formal training is not accurately listed on his DD Form 214.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant served on active duty from 3 January 2001 through 5 October  2005.
 On  5  October  2005,  he  was  discharged  for  misconduct,  with  service
characterized as general (Under Honorable Conditions).

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPAT recommends the application be denied and states,  in  part,  that
applicant has provided no proof  of  course  completion  or  course  length.
They  requested  applicant  provide  such  documentation,  but  he  has  not
responded.

The AFPC/DPPAT evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A complete copy of the evaluation was  forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  17
February 2006, for review and comment, within 30 days.  However, as of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the  case;  however,  we  agree
with the opinion and recommendation of  the  Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt it’s rationale as  the  basis  for  our  conclusion
that the applicant has not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or  injustice.
Therefore,  in  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered  Docket  Number  BC-2005-03418
in Executive Session on 22 March 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
                       Ms. Rita J. Maldonado, Member
                       Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Nov 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.



    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPAT, dated 7 Jan 06.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 06.




                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00906

    Original file (BC-2004-00906.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 5 Aug 03, the squadron commander notified the applicant that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force with service characterized as honorable for failure to progress in on-the-job training (OJT). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change the reason for his discharge. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAT evaluated the applicant’s request for benefits...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03861

    Original file (BC-2005-03861.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Officers will not be considered by an SSB if, in exercising reasonable diligence, the officer should have discovered the error or omission in his/her records and could have taken timely corrective action. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt it’s rationale as...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03571

    Original file (bc-2003-03571.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 31 July 2003, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied his request to upgrade his discharge. The AFPC/DPPAT evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 19 December 2003 for review and response within 30 days. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01236

    Original file (BC-2007-01236.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Amendment SO ACD-00565, dated 26 January 2007 pertaining to applicant's placement on the temporary retired file, effective 20 January 2007 reflects he retired in the projected higher grade of SSgt. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01615

    Original file (BC-2007-01615.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal letter. However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for his entry- level separation; i.e., entry-level performance and conduct, to be inappropriate. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected by deleting the words “and conduct”...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01973

    Original file (BC-2005-01973.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01973 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 February 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He retroactively receive a 10% increase in retired pay effective 1 January 1991, based on award of the Airman’s Medal (AmnM) for heroism. How can anyone determine the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00037

    Original file (BC-2006-00037.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The regulation allows that any soldier discharged with less than three years service is to receive the GCM if otherwise qualified. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00161

    Original file (BC-2006-00161.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00161 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 Jul 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Bronze Star Medal (BSM) awarded to him for the period 6 May 2005 to 8 September 2005 be accepted for file in his officer selection record (OSR) for the CY05A Colonel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03625

    Original file (BC-2005-03625.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    However, in the event the applicant provides the required document, an amended death certificate, it would be appropriate to correct the decedent’s records to show the applicant was the eligible spouse beneficiary upon his death. A spouse’s eligibility to receive an SBP annuity terminates upon divorce. However, to date, the applicant has not provided an amended death certificate.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01105

    Original file (BC-2006-01105.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01105 INDEX CODE: 110.01; 100:07 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 13 OCTOBER 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation of “unsatisfactory performance” be removed from her DD 214 and any mention of “unsatisfactory performance” be removed from her training...