RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03418
INDEX CODE: 100.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 May 2007
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be
changed to reflect that he completed the Air National Guard (ANG) Regional
Equipment Operators Training School (REOTS) and Accumulation Point
Management Training.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
All of his formal training is not accurately listed on his DD Form 214.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant served on active duty from 3 January 2001 through 5 October 2005.
On 5 October 2005, he was discharged for misconduct, with service
characterized as general (Under Honorable Conditions).
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPAT recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
applicant has provided no proof of course completion or course length.
They requested applicant provide such documentation, but he has not
responded.
The AFPC/DPPAT evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17
February 2006, for review and comment, within 30 days. However, as of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree
with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary
responsibility and adopt it’s rationale as the basis for our conclusion
that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005-03418
in Executive Session on 22 March 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Rita J. Maldonado, Member
Ms. Glenda H. Scheiner, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 2 Nov 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAT, dated 7 Jan 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00906
On 5 Aug 03, the squadron commander notified the applicant that he was recommending his discharge from the Air Force with service characterized as honorable for failure to progress in on-the-job training (OJT). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial of the applicant’s request to change the reason for his discharge. The complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAT evaluated the applicant’s request for benefits...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03861
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. Officers will not be considered by an SSB if, in exercising reasonable diligence, the officer should have discovered the error or omission in his/her records and could have taken timely corrective action. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt it’s rationale as...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-03571
On 31 July 2003, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied his request to upgrade his discharge. The AFPC/DPPAT evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 19 December 2003 for review and response within 30 days. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-01236
Amendment SO ACD-00565, dated 26 January 2007 pertaining to applicant's placement on the temporary retired file, effective 20 January 2007 reflects he retired in the projected higher grade of SSgt. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after reviewing the evidence of record we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01615
In support of his request, the applicant submits a personal letter. However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for his entry- level separation; i.e., entry-level performance and conduct, to be inappropriate. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected by deleting the words “and conduct”...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01973
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01973 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 February 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He retroactively receive a 10% increase in retired pay effective 1 January 1991, based on award of the Airman’s Medal (AmnM) for heroism. How can anyone determine the...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00037
The regulation allows that any soldier discharged with less than three years service is to receive the GCM if otherwise qualified. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00161
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00161 INDEX NUMBER: 131.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 13 Jul 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Bronze Star Medal (BSM) awarded to him for the period 6 May 2005 to 8 September 2005 be accepted for file in his officer selection record (OSR) for the CY05A Colonel...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03625
However, in the event the applicant provides the required document, an amended death certificate, it would be appropriate to correct the decedent’s records to show the applicant was the eligible spouse beneficiary upon his death. A spouse’s eligibility to receive an SBP annuity terminates upon divorce. However, to date, the applicant has not provided an amended death certificate.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01105
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01105 INDEX CODE: 110.01; 100:07 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 13 OCTOBER 2007 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation of “unsatisfactory performance” be removed from her DD 214 and any mention of “unsatisfactory performance” be removed from her training...