RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01105
INDEX CODE: 110.01; 100:07
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 13 OCTOBER 2007
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her narrative reason for separation of “unsatisfactory performance” be
removed from her DD 214 and any mention of “unsatisfactory performance” be
removed from her training records.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was discharged as part of the Force Shaping program, not unsatisfactory
performance.
In support of her application, the applicant submits copies of her DD 214
(parts 1 & 4), copies of training certificates, copies of Permanent Change
of Station (PCS) and discharge travel orders, and copies of her training
record. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Case Management Tracking System (CMTS)
indicates the applicant’s master personnel records have been missing since
2004 and the office of primary responsibility indicates there is no
documentation in her reconstructed records relating to the reason for
discharge or the discharge process. The following information was
extracted from information provided by the applicant.
On 9 July 2004, the applicant was honorably discharged from the Air Force
in the grade of Airman First Class (E-3) for unsatisfactory performance.
She had served 2 years, 1 month and 10 days on active duty to include 1
year and 8 months of Foreign Service.
In a letter dated 23 May 2006, the applicant was notified that HQ
AFPC/DPPAT was able to verify the completion of the Security Forces
Apprentice Course, Security Forces Apprentice Distance Learning Course, and
Air Force Training Course; however, they were unable to verify her
completion of the First Term Airman Course because it did not have a
personal [sic] data system code. On 16 August 2006, she was issued a new
DD 215 with the aforementioned corrections. In addition, she was awarded
the Global War on Terrorism Service Medal, the National Defense Service
Medal, and the Air Force Training Ribbon (Exhibit E).
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Based on limited supporting documentation contained in the applicant’s
personnel records, HQ AFPC/DPPRS defers to the Board to determine if the
applicant should be granted relief.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25
August 2006 for review and comment. As of this date, this office has
received no response (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s contentions are duly
noted; however, we are not persuaded that the applicant has been the victim
of an error or injustice. At the time members are separated from the Air
Force, they are furnished a narrative reason for separation predicated upon
the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. As the
applicant’s discharge file was not available for review and the supporting
documentation submitted does not substantiate her claim that she was
discharged for reasons other than those indicated on her DD 214, we find no
basis to warrant favorable action on this application. However, should the
applicant provide information to corroborate her claim, we would be willing
to reconsider her requests.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2006-
01105 in Executive Session on 24 October 2006, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Panel Chair
Mr. James L. Sommer., Member
Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Apr 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPPS, dated 2 Jun 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Aug 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPRY, dated 16 Aug 06, w/atchs.
MICHAEL V. BARBINO
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02294
As of this date, this office has received no response (Exhibit D). Although the actions taken to effect the applicant’s discharge and RE code she received were accurate, we believe she should be provided the opportunity to apply for enlistment in the armed services. MICHAEL V. BARBINO Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-02294 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02690
Applicant acknowledged receipt and, after consulting counsel, submitted statements for the discharge authority’s review on 27 January 2005; however, the discharge authority directed her separation for unsatisfactory performance (failure to progress in on-the- job training) with an honorable characterization of service and applicant was subsequently separated on 11 February 2005. On 21 June 2005, the BCMR, via a Board majority vote, directed her records be changed to show an RE code of “3K”...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02977
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02977 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 APR 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His narrative reason for separation be changed to “academic difficulties” rather than “unsatisfactory performance,” and his reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C (involuntarily...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02433
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02433 INDEX CODE: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 11 FEBRUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “2C” to an eligible code to permit reentry into the military. At the time a member is separated from the Air Force,...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03839
According to her separation document, she was discharged on 31 October 2003 for “pregnancy or childbirth.” ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS states the applicant’s voluntary request for separation is not on file in the master personnel records; however, based on available documentation, it appears the applicant voluntarily submitted an application for separation under the provisions of AFI 36-3208...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02221
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02221 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 JANUARY 2008 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation (Unsatisfactory Performance) be removed. She received an Enlisted Performance Report closing 6 November 1989 in which the overall evaluation was 1....
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02963
He was informed by his commander that there was no guarantee of the job he would receive, but he would most likely be assigned to Security Forces. On 19 Jul 05, he was academically eliminated from the Air Traffic Control course because he failed the Block II, Unit 9 test with a 52% score. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 11 Oct 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-03839
On 6 May 2004, the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) performed a fitness determination only, concluding the applicant was unfit for continued military duty due to asthma. The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request. The DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01813 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be allowed to retest for promotion to staff sergeant (E-5) in the Weighted Airman Promotion System (WAPS) for cycle 98E5, in the Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 3M050 (Services Craftsman). AFI 36-2605 requires individuals to...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00971
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00971 INDEX CODE: 124.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 30 SEP 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her burn injuries to her upper and lower back be reflected on the AF Form 356, Findings and Recommended Disposition of USAF Information Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB), dated 15 July 2004. ...