Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02042
Original file (BC-2005-02042.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied



                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-02042
            INDEX CODE:  66.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  1 Jan 07

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His general discharge  be  upgraded  to  honorable  and  his  rank  be
restored to airman third class with all benefits.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

As an Air Force journalist, he discovered a money laundering situation
on  base  and  soon  afterwards  he   was   discharged.    Under   the
“Whistleblower” law now, this would be unjust.

In support of his appeal, the applicant provided personal  statements,
extracts of his military personnel records, and supportive statements.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military personnel records were destroyed by  fire  in
1973 at the National Personnel  Record  Center  (NPRC)  in  St. Louis,
Missouri; therefore, the circumstances surrounding his separation from
the Air Force cannot be verified.

Applicant’s available records indicate the applicant enlisted  in  the
Air Force on 31 Mar 55 for a period of four  years  in  the  grade  of
airman basic.

On 24 May 56, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR
39-16 (Unsuitability) in the grade of airman  basic  and  furnished  a
general (under honorable conditions) discharge.  He was credited  with
1 year, 1 month, and 24 days of active service.

Pursuant  to  the  Board  staff’s  request,  the  Federal  Bureau   of
Investigation  (FBI),   Clarksburg,   West   Virginia,   provided   an
investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C.

By  letter,  dated  26  Aug  05,  the  applicant  provided  additional
documentary evidence for the Board’s consideration, which is  attached
at Exhibit E.

By letter, undated,  the  applicant  provided  additional  documentary
evidence for the Board’s consideration, which is attached  at  Exhibit
G.

By letter, dated 3 Nov 05, the applicant provided a  response  to  the
FBI report, which is attached at Exhibit H.

By letter, dated 22 Nov 05, applicant’s senator (retired)  provided  a
statement on his behalf, which is attached at Exhibit I.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice warranting corrective action.  The
evidence of record reveals the applicant was given a general discharge
for  unsuitability  in  the  grade  of  airman  basic.   There  is  no
indication in the evidence provided that the applicant’s discharge was
improper or contrary to the  provisions  of  the  discharge  directive
under which it was effected.   Furthermore,  because  of  insufficient
documentation concerning his activities since leaving the service,  we
are not  inclined  to  recommend  upgrading  his  discharge  based  on
clemency at this time.  Based upon the presumption  of  regularity  in
the conduct of  governmental  affairs  and  without  evidence  to  the
contrary, we also must assume the  applicant  was  discharged  in  the
appropriate   grade.    The   applicant’s   comments   regarding   the
“Whistleblower” issue was noted.  However, in  view  of  his  lack  of
specificity, and the fact the Whistleblower  legislation  was  not  in
effect  during  the  period  of  the  alleged  reprisal,  we  find  no
compelling basis to address his contention at this late  and  untimely
date.  In view of the foregoing, and  in  the  absence  of  sufficient
evidence to the contrary, the applicant’s requests  that  his  general
discharge be upgraded to honorable and his rank be restored to  airman
third class will all benefits are not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-02042 in Executive Session on 3 Nov 05 and 27 Dec 05,  under  the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
      Ms. Sue A. Lumpkins, Member
      Mr. James L. Sommer, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, undated.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  FBI Report.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 12 Aug 05.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, applicant, dated 26 Aug 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit F.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 4 Oct 05.
    Exhibit G.  Letter, applicant, undated, w/atch.
    Exhibit H.  Letter, applicant, dated 3 Nov 05.
    Exhibit I.  Letter, in applicant’s behalf, dated 22 Nov 05.




                                   RICHARD A. PETERSON
                                   Panel Chair



Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03099

    Original file (BC-2005-03099.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03099 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 APR 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 12 Aug 88, the applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10 by...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03875

    Original file (BC-2005-03875.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 03875 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 23 JUNE 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01797

    Original file (BC-2005-01797.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Jul 05 for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his general discharge should be upgraded. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02743

    Original file (BC-2005-02743.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was reported absent without leave from 26-28 April 1966 and 20-23 May 1966. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) provided a copy of an investigative report pertaining to the applicant (Identification Record No. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that applicant was not afforded all the rights to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1992-01879A

    Original file (BC-1992-01879A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit F. Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Washington, D.C., provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit G. On 30 Nov 05, a copy of the FBI Report was forwarded to the applicant for review and/or comment. We therefore recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. Exhibit H. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 30 Nov 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02164

    Original file (BC-2004-02164.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 30 Jul 04. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Aug 04.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02144

    Original file (BC-2005-02144.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02144 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2006 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. There was no discharge case file in the applicant’s military personnel records. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00132

    Original file (BC-2005-00132.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 10 Feb 05, SAF/MRBR advised the applicant that, upon receiving his application, they researched the index of military personnel records stored at NPRC. Pursuant to a 3 Mar 05 request by the AFBCMR Staff, AFLSA/JAJM provided a copy of the applicant’s Record of Trial (ROT) and associated documents, including a legal review. The Board of Review did not recommend clemency and, on 24 Aug 56, the sentence was affirmed.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01540

    Original file (BC-2004-01540.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01540 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 16 August 2004, the servicemember was provided the opportunity to respond to the FBI investigation within 14 days (Exhibit E). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01991

    Original file (BC-2005-01991.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01991 INDEX CODE: 106.00, 100.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 81150 rather than 81130, and his 1985 discharge be upgraded from general to honorable. According to his Enlisted...