RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02743
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 5 JANUARY 2007
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge be
upgraded to honorable.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His discharge was unfair. There was no mention during the court-martial
trial that he would receive this type of discharge as punishment.
In support of his application, the applicant submits a copy of the special
court-martial order and a copy of his separation document. The applicant’s
complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 17 April 1961, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force at the
age of 17 in the grade of airman basic (E-1) for a period of 4 years. He
was progressively promoted to the grade of airman second class (E-3)
effective and with a date of rank of 1 June 1962.
The applicant was reported absent without leave from 26-28 April 1966 and
20-23 May 1966. On 21 July 1966, he was convicted by a special court-
martial for being absent without leave from 31 May to 11 July 1966. For
this offense, he was sentenced to 3 months confinement and forfeited $20.00
per month for 3 months.
On 29 September 1966, the applicant’s commander notified the applicant that
he was recommending the applicant be separated from the Air Force under the
provisions of AFR 39-17 because of frequent involvement of a discreditable
nature with civil or military authorities and a dishonorable failure to pay
just debts. The applicant was advised of his rights. The applicant
acknowledged receipt of notification, waived his right to consult counsel
and his entitlement to appear before the board. The commander thereafter
initiated a recommendation for the applicant’s separation.
On 14 November 1966, the discharge authority approved the recommendation
and directed that the applicant be discharged from the service and
furnished an Undesirable Discharge certificate.
On 18 November 1966, the applicant was discharged under other than
honorable conditions. He had served 5 years 2 months and 18 days on active
duty. He had 134 days of lost time due to absence without leave and
confinement.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI)
provided a copy of an investigative report pertaining to the applicant
(Identification Record No. 543395L4), which is at Exhibit E.
________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. DPPRS indicates the discharge was
consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the
discharge regulation, and was within the discretion of the discharge
authority. Additionally, the applicant did not submit any evidence,
identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge
processing, or provide any facts warranting a change to his character of
service.
HQ AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for
review and comment on 4 November 2005. On 29 November 2005, the applicant
was invited to submit information pertaining to his post-service
accomplishments. On 27 December 2005, a copy of the Federal Bureau of
Investigations (FBI) report was forwarded to the applicant. As of this
date, this office has received no response to any of the aforementioned
correspondence (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. We find no impropriety in the
characterization of applicant's discharge. It appears that responsible
officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we
do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or
that applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the
time of discharge. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge proceedings
were proper and characterization of the discharge was appropriate to the
existing circumstances. In addition, in view of the applicant’s apparent
involvement with civilian law enforcement since his separation and absent
any evidence by the applicant attesting to a successful post-service
adjustment, we are not inclined to favorably consider his request based on
clemency. Therefore, we find no basis to warrant favorable action on this
application.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; that the application
was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will
only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant
evidence not considered with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 30 March 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2005-02743:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 Aug 05 w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 26 Oct 05.
Exhibit D. Letters, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Nov 05; AFBCMR dated
29 Nov 05 & undated.
Exhibit E. FBI Report.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01797
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Jul 05 for review and comment within 30 days. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded his general discharge should be upgraded. ...
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. Since his discharge occurred over 48 years ago and considering he was only 19...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03647
On 19 September 1957, his commander requested the applicant appear before a board of officers to determine whether he would be discharged for unfitness. DPPRS states the applicant’s discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation in effect at that time and, was within the discretion of the discharge authority. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00749
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00749 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 04 SEPTEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under other than honorable conditions (undesirable) discharge be upgraded. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01991
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01991 INDEX CODE: 106.00, 100.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 24 Dec 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 reflect an Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) of 81150 rather than 81130, and his 1985 discharge be upgraded from general to honorable. According to his Enlisted...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02144
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02144 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY COMPLETION DATE: 10 NOVEMBER 2006 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. There was no discharge case file in the applicant’s military personnel records. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair AFBCMR...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03691
Applicant’s grade at time of discharge was airman basic (AB/E-1). Based on available documentation in the file, they found the discharge consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge directives in effect at the time of discharge. Having found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on his request.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02109
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02109 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: AMERICAN LEGION HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. He had completed a total of 6 month and 11 days and was serving in the grade of airman basic (E-1) at the time of discharge. DPPRS indicated that the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02763
On 23 September 1975 and 17 February 1982, the Air Force Discharge Review Board considered the applicant’s request for discharge upgrade and concluded that the evidence submitted was insufficient to warrant a change of his discharge and denied his request. On 27 January 1976, a similar appeal was considered and denied by the Air Force Correction of Military Records Board. DPPRS states that based upon the documentation in the file, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02327
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit D. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 12 Aug 05, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). Were you provided a response on a timely basis? No c. Could be improved d. N/A RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS The Record of Proceedings (ROP) contains a summary of your request, your contentions, the...