Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01874
Original file (BC-2005-01874.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01874
            INDEX CODE:  110.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 FEBRUARY 2007

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Block 19, Mailing Address After Separation, be  changed  to
reflect his home address of Illinois.

_________________________________________________________________

THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Had he known that he would not be able to use Veteran benefits  in  Illinois
upon completion of his tour of duty, he would not  have  enlisted.   His  DD
Form 214 is of no use to him.  He would like to use the  Illinois  Veteran’s
Grant  to  obtain  higher  education.   However,  he  is  having  difficulty
obtaining this because of the differences  in  addresses/states  on  his  DD
Form 214.  He was born in Illinois but cannot claim the title  of  being  an
Illinois Veteran.  There is no error but an injustice exists.

In support of his appeal, applicant submits a personal statement and a  copy
of his DD  Form  214.   Applicant’s  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 6 December 1988, the applicant was honorably released  from  active  duty
and transferred to the Air Force Reserve in  the  grade  of  sergeant  (E-4)
under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Expiration Term  of  Obligated  Service).
He had served 4 years on active duty.  He continued  serving  with  the  Air
Force Reserve until his discharge which occurred on 12 June 1993.

On 6 September 2005, Headquarters Air  Force  Personnel  Center  issued  the
applicant a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, for the 6 December  1988
separation date, reflecting the addition of block  7b,  Home  of  Record  at
Time of Entry.

_________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPRS  recommends  the  application  be  denied.   DPPRS  states   that
according to the documentation on file in the master personnel  records,  on
13 June 1990, the applicant reenlisted  in  the  Air  Force  Reserve  for  a
period of 3 years and indicated his home of record was Las  Vegas,  NV.   On
15 April 1991, the applicant was honorably released from active duty due  to
demobilization and again provided Las  Vegas,  NV  as  his  mailing  address
after separation.  The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant states he  would  like  to  be  considered  an  Illinois  Veteran,
however, he cannot qualify for the Illinois Veteran’s grant due to the  fact
that his DD Form 214 separation address differs from his home state  of  IL.
Applicant states that the advisory does not address the injustice,  inequity
and unfairness of this situation.  Applicant’s letter is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence  has  been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an injustice.  The evidence provided has led us to consider  it
reasonable to favorably consider the applicant’s request.   While  we  agree
with the Air Force office of primary responsibility that  no  error  exists,
we note that disapproval of the applicant’s  request  would  result  in  his
ineligibility to use his Illinois Veteran’s Grant.  Therefore,  in  view  of
the above and because his home of record at time of  entry  on  active  duty
was Illinois and it also appears the applicant resides in  Illinois,  it  is
our opinion that his records should be corrected  to  the  extent  indicated
below.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that at  the  time  of  his  release  from
active duty on 6 December 1988, his Mailing
Address After Separation, was 447 D. Sidney, Glendale Heights, IL 30139.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board  considered  Docket  Number  03-03746  in
Executive Session on 19 January 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
                 Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
                 Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR  Docket  Number
05-01874:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Jul 05, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, undated.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Nov 05.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 25 Nov 05.




                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                   Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-01874




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to xxxxxxxxxxxx, be corrected to show that at the time of his
release from active duty on 6 December 1988, his Mailing Address After
Separation, was 447 D. Sidney, Glendale Heights, IL 30139.






  JOE G. LINEBERGER

  Director

  Air Force Review Boards Agency

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 02309

    Original file (BC 2014 02309.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. AFPC Enlisted Accessions Branch confirmed that the applicant initialed the DD Form 4, dated 28 June 2002, listing Las Vegas, NV as his HOR. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140010293

    Original file (20140010293.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    By law and regulation, the HOR is the place recorded as the home of the individual at the time of their enlistment or induction, and there is no authority to change the HOR officially recorded at the time of entry into military service unless it is based on evidence that a bona fide error was made. In this case, the evidence of record shows that the applicant listed his HOR as Natrona Heights, PA on his enlistment document. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2014 | 20140002417

    Original file (20140002417.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    There is no authority to change the HOR as officially recorded at the time of entry into the military service. Correction of the HOR must be based on evidence that a bona fide error was made and the HOR as corrected must have been the actual home of the individual at the time of entry into the relevant period of service. The applicant has provided insufficient evidence to show his permanent home was not Las Vegas, NV at the time he enlisted in the RA on 20 January 2006.

  • AF | DRB | CY2003 | FD2002-0258

    Original file (FD2002-0258.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) GRADE AFSN/SSAN

  • AF | BCMR | CY2001 | 0003139

    Original file (0003139.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-03139 INDEX CODE: 128.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for two self-procured commercial airline tickets, totaling $615.97. After the funeral, the applicant’s mother-in-law was to fly from Miami to Philadelphia, PA, while she waited for government provided transportation...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2009 | 20090007307

    Original file (20090007307.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant requests that his home of record (HOR) on his military records be changed to show 1*** B***** Street, West City, Illinois 62812. This is especially significant since he provided information at the time of his enlistment in the Regular Army that fails to show that he ever resided at an address in West City, Illinois. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00071

    Original file (BC-2005-00071.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 11 Mar 82, the Airman Performance Report (APR) for the period 29 Jan 81 through 28 Jan 82, was referred to the applicant. Time lost for the following periods: 28-31 Oct 81, 15-16 Dec 81, 29 Jan- 1 Feb 82, 16-21 Feb 82, and 20 May 82-23 Sep 82. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF EVALUATION: A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jan 05 for...

  • AF | DRB | CY2006 | FD2006-00143

    Original file (FD2006-00143.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL) -----------------------------------. The applicant had further misconduct and received his first Article 15 for being absent from his appointed place of duty. For your actions, you were punished yourself as an AFOSI agent to Mr.; ....................... undk Article 15, UCMJ, on 18 Mar 04 coniisting of reduction to the grade of airman basic, restriction to Nellis AFB, NV for 45 days, 45 days...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03660

    Original file (BC-2006-03660.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-03660 INDEX CODE: 128.14 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 JUNE 2008 ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for moving his dependents and household goods (HHG) more than a year before he was issued Permanent Change of Station (PCS) orders. ...

  • NAVY | DRB | 2004 Marine | MD04-01024

    Original file (MD04-01024.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Applicant requests the characterization of service received at the time of discharge be changed to honorable or entry level separation and that the narrative reason for separation be changed to Expiration of Term of Service, with a letter from the NDRB recommending the Applicant for government service. F_” or “Applicant”) hereby submits this application to upgrade his discharge characterization from Other Than Honorable (OTH) to Honorable or Entry Level Separation, and to change the...