RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01849
INDEX CODE: 110.03
COUNSEL: VICTOR KELLEY
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His record be corrected to show:
a. His reinstatement to his former technical job with the
Alabama Air National Guard (ALANG), or in the alternative, that he be
allowed to appeal his commander’s decision to remove him from his
aircraft mechanic position.
b. His transfer to the Retired Reserve with all rights and
privileges thereto.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While on temporary duty (TDY) with the ALANG in Turkey, he lawfully
purchased 21 shotguns which he brought back to the United States on 4
March 2002. He claimed only 10 of the shotguns on a customs form.
According to court records, by not claiming all the guns in his
possession he underpaid his tariff fees by $192.00. He was
consequently indicted and pleaded guilty to smuggling merchandise into
the United States. At his sentencing hearing on 6 March 2003, the
Court was forced to use Federal sentencing guidelines that resulted in
him being sentenced to 12 months and 1 day of incarceration. It
should be noted that on 5 November 2001, well in advance of the above
events, he had been notified by the Department of the Air Force that
he was eligible for Reserve retirement at age 60.
On 18 December 2002, his commander recommended administrative
separation from the ANG with a service characterization of Under Other
Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC). Subsequently, he submitted an
application for transfer to the Retired Reserve that he failed to
sign. On 16 May 2003, his commander notified him by memorandum that
his application needed to be signed and returned. However, the
memorandum was sent to the wrong address and he never received it. On
19 May 2003, his commander placed him in a non-duty status and barred
him from access to the base. On 11 June 2003, his commander directed
he be removed from his military technician position of aircraft
mechanic. On 14 July 2003, he began his incarceration.
Notwithstanding that his command had originally intended to refer him
to an administrative separation board with a recommendation he receive
an UOTHC discharge, on 4 August 2003, he was honorably discharged from
the ALANG. After his release from incarceration in May 2004, he
immediately initiated contact with military authorities requesting
transfer to the Retired Reserve as should have been done a year
earlier. He was told to submit an application to the AFBCMR.
Attempts by the applicant and his counsel to contact his former
commander and Judge Advocate (JA) personnel at his former unit have
either gone unanswered or, in the case of the JA, he was again advised
to submit application to the AFBCMR. Due process and fundamental
fairness require that he should have been given the opportunity to
respond to the commander’s notification.
In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided a statement from
counsel and copies of court documents, his 20-year letter, his
commander’s various recommendations for involuntary separation
including a request to place him in a non-duty status, a debarment
letter, removal from his technician position and honorable discharge
action as well as pertinent email trails, correspondence from his
counsel and a copy of a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the ANG on 5 August 1981 and was progressively
promoted to the grade of technical sergeant with a date of rank of 3
January 1996. On 5 November 2001, he was notified of his eligibility
for retired pay at age 60. On 27 September 2002, he was indicted by a
Grand Jury for violating Title 18 United States Code Section 545. He
entered into a plea agreement wherein he would plead guilty to Count
One of the indictment and, on 8 May 2003, was sentenced to one year
and one day to be served in Federal prison. On 9 May 2003, his
commander requested approval to place him in a non-duty status with
pay. Also on 9 May 2003, he was officially debarred from the base
until further notice and would not be allowed access without written
permission. He applied for transfer to the Retired Reserve in lieu of
further processing of administrative discharge for cause asking that
his transfer be effective 31 December 2003. On 16 May 2003, his
commander notified him his application to transfer to the Retired
Reserve was not signed and he was given until 27 May 2003 to submit a
signed application. On 11 June 2003, he was removed from his military
technician position as a jet engine mechanic. He began serving his
sentence on 14 July 2003. On 4 August 2003, he was honorably
discharged from the ALANG after having served for 22 years.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ANG/A1POF states contact with the ALANG revealed that had a signed AF
Form 131, Application for Transfer to the Retired Reserve, it would
have been processed. The Headquarters AL National Guard has no
objection to the applicant’s transfer to the Retired Reserve and A1POF
therefore recommends relief be granted. However, the loss of his
membership in the ALANG and his military technician position were
accomplished through proper discharge proceedings and A1POF recommends
relief for his reinstatement be denied.
A1POF’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit B.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Counsel for the applicant disagrees with the ANG’s finding that his
client’s loss of his military and military technician positions with
the ALANG was accomplished through proper discharge proceedings.
Counsel argues the applicant was not afforded proper due process and
that should the Board not recommend reinstatement that he be given the
right to respond to his commander’s notification and the command
revisit the subject of his original removal once the command is in
compliance with its own regulations.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice regarding his transfer to the Retired
Reserve. It appears the applicant applied for transfer to the Retired
Reserve prior to his discharge, but his application was not signed.
However, the Headquarters of the Alabama National Guard has no
objection to the applicant’s transfer to the Retired Reserve and the
Air National Guard Headquarters concurs with the States position.
Therefore, the Board recommends the applicant’s records be corrected
as indicated below.
4. Regarding his request he be reinstated to his former position with
the ALANG, it should be noted the Board lacks the authority to
reinstate the applicant back to his position within the Air National
Guard.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was discharged from
the Alabama Air National Guard effective 29 December 2003, transferred
to the Individual Ready Reserve effective 30 December 2003, and
transferred to the Reserve Retired List effective 31 December 2003,
eligible for retired pay at age 60 under the provisions of Title 10,
USC, Section 12731.
______________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 26 April 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Jay H. Jordan, Panel Chair
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 May 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Letter, NGB/A1POF, dated 22 Mar 06.
Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 31 Mar 06.
JAY H. JORDAN
Panel Chair
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
WASHINGTON DC
[pic]
Office Of The Assistant Secretary
AFBCMR BC-2005-01849
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was
discharged from the Alabama Air National Guard effective 29 December
2003, transferred to the Individual Ready Reserve effective 30
December 2003, and transferred to the Retired Reserve List effective
31 December 2003 eligible for retired pay at age 60 under the
provisions of Title 10, USC, Section 12731.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02974
He had been promoted to the Reserve grade of major in 1997 and had retained that rank up to his transfer to the Retired Reserve. On 3 November 2003, he applied for transfer to the Retired Reserve. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03580
Additionally, because he was considered a two-time passover for promotion to lieutenant colonel, he was notified he would be retired as required by law effective 1 April 2001. He did not complete the training because of his retirement from military service effective 1 April 2001. The particular member was never the applicant’s supervisor and his duties and responsibilities at the time were far- removed from the applicants.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02314
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02314 INDEX CODE: 125.00, 145.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His military medical records be changed to show his medical condition, right paracentral disc protrusion L 4-5, was aggravated by military service as determined by a Report of Investigation (ROI) of his Line of...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00702
Documentation of this interview will serve as a record of the member's intent to reenlist at ETS as well as the unit commander's selection for reenlistment. DPFOC notes the commander did not recommend the applicant for reenlistment. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00746
Prior to being released on 26 June 2004, he requested additional orders so he may remain on active duty until the MEB had heard his case and made a final decision on it. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was not released from active duty with the Air National Guard on 21 January 2006, but was continued on active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-02488
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02488 INDEX CODE: 125.00, 145.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 23 May 2003 discharge be revoked and he be allowed to remain on active duty with all pay and allowances until such time as HQ Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) has made a final determination regarding his medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01178
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01178 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: Michael J. Calabro HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His record be corrected to show that all: a. The ADB recommendation for his characterization of service was not consistent with his military record. He was never told why he was not afforded his rights or why...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00639
However, his name had already appeared on the Reserve Officer Personnel Management Act (ROPMA) Mandatory Promotion List prior to him meeting the time in grade (TIG) requirement for a Unit Vacancy (UV) promotion. In support of his appeal, the applicant has provided promotion orders to first lieutenant and captain, and the fiscal year 2004 (FY04) Reserve of the Air Force Line and Nonline Captain Promotion Selection Boards results. He was commissioned in the Louisiana ANG (LAANG) on 20 August...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00343
Second, he is concerned the Board might consider not granting his request to correct the known errors on the SF-50B as the Board may only correct military records - not civilian records. Based on the evidence of record, had the applicant not been separated, he would have continued to serve in the Air National Guard (ANG). We note applicant’s request that he be promoted to lieutenant colonel three years from the date of the Board.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-00685
On 3 Aug 10, the Vice Chief of Joint Staff signed an order amending the applicants separation from the ANG and transfer to the Air Force Reserve to reflect his discharge from the WYANG and as a Reserve of the Air Force effective 10 Oct 10, under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, para 2.25.2, ANG Unique Separations. In addition, no one had the authority to discharge the applicant from the Reserve of the Air Force (See SAF/IG Report at Exhibit B). According to AFI 36-3209, the authority to...