RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03128
INDEX CODE: 108.00
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 16 April 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be given a new Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) rating.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
There are inaccuracies in the initiation, application, and processing of
actions associated with his medical condition. The administrative actions
resulting from the final determination in his Fitness for Continued
Military Duty (FFD) process should be terminated and an informal Line of
Duty (LOD) investigation should be initiated for injuries he sustained
while in a military duty status on 8 April 2004. The administrative LOD
action taken by the Air Force Reserve Command Surgeon General (AFRC/SG)
staff on 23 June 2005 for his injuries was inaccurate and contradicted
guidance in current Air Force Instructions on processing LODs on Reserve
personnel. In addition, actions taken in his FFD case resulting in the
current pending administrative actions, was based on incorrect
administrative action by the AFRC/SG staff.
In support of his application, the applicant provides a personal statement;
and copies of training orders, personnel brief, medical records, and
numerous memorandums/letters/e-mails concerning his FFD evaluation, PEB
findings, and his administrative discharge. The applicant’s complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s available records indicate he retired from the Air Force
Reserve effective 19 September 2005 in the grade of technical sergeant with
32 years, 11 months, and 28 days of satisfactory service.
The applicant was on orders 5-16 April 2005 at Dobbins Air Force Base,
Georgia, in support of an Operational Readiness Inspection Exercise. On 8
April 2004, he reported to the flight medicine clinic for a bruise to the
head, stating he had bumped his head against a wall. The attending doctor
noted in his medical record that the head trauma was sustained in an
activity not related to the drill. The applicant presented to the clinic
again on 18 April 2004, two days after his orders ended, for anxiety and
panic attacks. On 22 April 2004, he was placed on a physical profile of
“P4” pending further medical evaluation An LOD was accomplished due to the
applicant’s mental health diagnosis and the medication he was taking to
determine his fitness for duty.
On 13 May 2004, the applicant was notified that he was restricted from
further participation for pay or points until a PEB determination was
processed and determination was made on his military status. On 7 June
2004, the Air Force Reserve Board determined the applicant medically
disqualified for worldwide duty and continued military service due to his
diagnosis of depression treated with psychotropic medication since 29 March
2004. On 9 June 2004, the applicant requested his case be referred to an
Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) for fitness evaluation.
On 26 April 2005, the IPEB found the applicant unfit for continued military
service with the diagnosis of Major Depressive Disorder, Single Episode,
Partial Remission, associated with Anxiety and Panic Disorders. On 28 May
2005, the applicant concurred with the IPEB findings and chose to waive his
case for referral to a Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) for fitness
determination. In addition, he acknowledged that discharge proceedings
would be initiated against him unless he chose retirement in lieu of
discharge.
As stated above, the applicant’s available records indicate he retired from
the Air Force Reserve effective 19 September 2005 in the grade of technical
sergeant with 32 years, 11 months, and 28 days of satisfactory service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFRC/DPZ recommends denial of the applicant’s request for a new PEB rating.
DPZ states the administrative LOD paperwork, filed in the applicant’s
military medical records, documents his head injuries on 8 April 2004 and
indicates he inflicted the injuries upon himself. The attending doctor did
not annotate the injuries were not in the line of duty; therefore, the
injuries would be considered in the line of duty. The FFD case initiated
on the applicant was not based on the head injuries, but was based on the
diagnosis of “depression treated with psychotropic medications.” The
diagnosis was an incidental diagnosis uncovered during the applicant’s
treatment for head injuries. It was also documented that he has had
syptoms of depression since September 2003.
It is the opinion of DPZ that the applicant has not provided any data or
information that would warrant a change to his records. However, if the
decision is to grant the relief sought, the records should show the
findings of the PEB to be invalid and that the applicant is qualified for
continued military service.
The DPZ evaluation is at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPD recommends denial of the applicant’s request. DPPD states the
preponderance of evidence reflects the Physical Disability Division never
received a referral to the PEB; therefore, they could not have given the
applicant a medical discharge.
The DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant on 20
January 2006 for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's
complete submission in judging the merits of the case and do not find that
it supports a determination that the Reserves finding him unfit for
continued military service was in error or unjust. Applicant’s contentions
are duly noted; however, we find no evidence to indicate the applicant was
treated differently than any other individuals in similar situated
circumstances. In view of this finding, we agree with the opinions and
recommendation of the Air Force advisory opinions and we adopt their
rationale as a basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the
victim of either an error or an injustice. In the absence of evidence to
the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this appeal.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 18 May 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member
Ms. LeLoy W. Cottrell, Member
The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2005-03128 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Oct 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/DPZ, dated 5 Jan 06.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 12 Jan 06, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 Jan 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00883
Applicant’s complete submission, w/attachments, is at Exhibit A. Based on documentation provided by the applicant he did retire from the Air Force Reserve in part due to having a condition that made him physically disqualified for active duty. Applicant appealed the unfit decision to the Formal Physical Evaluation Board (FPEB) on 1 Apr 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02357
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available records, the applicant served on active duty, from 13 Oct 82 to 29 Oct 92 and was transferred to the Air Force Reserve. They must have eight years of active service and have been on active duty orders for more than 30 days at the time the condition became unfitting, as subsequently determined by the PEB, and meet all other requirements set forth under the law and governing Air Force...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02702
He was told 12731b pertained only to those reservists who had served more than 15 but less than 20 years and had experienced an injury considered not in the line of duty were eligible for retirement. He would pay the severance back if he could retire. A1B’s complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant believes he earned retirement benefits by serving for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03709
There was no disabling or disqualifying issue; therefore no requirement for a Medical Evaluation Board existed. AFI 36-3212 allows for a reserve member to be retained in the reserves and returned to duty even though he may have a medical condition that requires some restrictions. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered BCMR Docket Number BC-2011-03709 in Executive Session on 28 June 2012 and on 11 July 2012, under the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00470
His spine injury be determined to be in-the-line-of-duty (ILOD). On 24 Jul 10, the applicant appealed the Informal LOD Determination of existed prior to serviceService Aggravated for his cervical spine, asking that the injury be re-investigated. Regarding the applicants contention the IPEB failed to appreciate the severity of his spinal condition, according to AFI 36-3212, Physical Evaluation For Retention, Retirement, And Separation, when reviewing cases, the IPEB considers medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-02769
In support of his request, the applicant provides a statement from counsel and copies of excerpts of his military personnel records and civilian and service medical records pertaining to his LOD Determination, Medical Evaluation Board (MEB), Physical Evaluation Board (PEB), and subsequent permanent retirement for physical disability. The applicant contends that his 2004 LOD injury rendered him unfit to perform his duties and, thus, he should have been retained on active duty until he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05881
The 2003 surgery and disc herniation was not in the line of duty, so she is predisposed for back pain/disc herniation from a pre-existing non-military back injury. On 28 Aug 07, an Informal LOD determination concluded the applicants major depressive disorder related to her back pain was in the line of duty. On 29 Aug 07, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) awarded the applicant a 100 percent combined disability rating, based upon the loss of use of both lower extremities. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05881
The 2003 surgery and disc herniation was not in the line of duty, so she is predisposed for back pain/disc herniation from a pre-existing non-military back injury. On 28 Aug 07, an Informal LOD determination concluded the applicants major depressive disorder related to her back pain was in the line of duty. On 29 Aug 07, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) awarded the applicant a 100 percent combined disability rating, based upon the loss of use of both lower extremities. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00698
If he is medically unfit to serve, due to an LOD injury, he should be retired medically from the time of injury. He enlisted into the Air Force Reserves on 23 May 2000 for a period of 6 years. He had to file against his employer to prove that the absences were due to injury and beyond his control.
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01911
AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) Special Review Panel (SRP) recommends that there be no change of the applicants disability and separation determination as it relates to his diagnosed PTSD. This is the reason why an individual can be found unfit for military service for one or more medical conditions, under Title 10, and yet sometime thereafter receive compensation ratings from the DVA for additional medical conditions that were service-connected, but not...