RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00757
INDEX NUMBER: 145.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 JUL 2007
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to show he was disability discharged with
severance pay rather than retired and transferred on the Reserve Retired
List on 1 November 2003, awaiting retired pay at age 60.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His back injury should have been classified as in the line of duty (LOD)
and he should have been medically discharged with severance pay.
In support of his request, the applicant submits excerpts from his Medical
Records and a Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) Rating Decision.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 25 February 1981, was
progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant and voluntarily
separated on 31 January 1993. He entered the Reserves on 29 September
1994. On 12 September 2003, he was notified by memorandum of
administrative discharge, due to physical disqualification and of his
option to elect early retirement.
He acknowledged receipt on 24 September 2003, and submitted an application
for transfer to the Retired Reserve. On 1 November 2003, he was relieved
from his assignment and placed on the Reserve Retired List. By rating
decision dated 25 March 2003, the DVA granted service connection for
herniated disc L5-S1 with chronic lumbar strain rated 20 percent effective
15 October 2002. He also received service connection for right shoulder
condition (incurred during his first period of active duty) rated at zero
percent. A DVA rating decision dated 30 June 2005, continued the
20 percent rating for his back.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
AFRC/SGP recommends the applicant be returned to active duty for the
purpose of undergoing disability processing through the Air Force
Disability Evaluation System. Review of documentation provided by the
applicant substantiates the fact he did have an injury to his back while on
active duty prior to joining the Reserves. His symptoms began as early as
December 1986. At that time he was treated for lower back pain with right
sided radiculopathy. He experience multiple episodes of lower back pain
from 1986 though 1991, while on active duty. An MRI of the lumbar spine
dated 2 October 2002, confirms a broad based central tight paracentral disc
herniation at the probable L5-S1 with severe degenerative disease at that
level, indicating a long standing problem.
The AFRC/SGP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that an error in processing
the LOD determination occurred, but changing the records may result in
substituting mutually exclusive benefits. The applicant’s back condition
was incurred or permanently aggravated while on extended active duty and
warranted a 20 percent disability rating that would have resulted in
disability discharge with severance pay.
The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS:
He would like to have his records changed to show a disability discharge
with 20 percent severance pay and is willing to forfeit/forgo his
eligibility for Reserve retirement and the dollar-for-dollar offset to the
DVA Disability Compensation.
The applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit F.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice with regard to the applicant’s separation
from active duty. We note the BCMR Medical Consultant’s opinion that the
evidence of record supports the applicant’s contention that his back
condition was erroneously determined to be non-duty related based on the
June 1999 motor vehicle accident. The preponderance of the evidence is
sufficient to indicate an error in the LOD determination that the
applicant’s back condition was incurred or permanently aggravated during
his first period of active duty service from 1982 to 1993. In deference to
the comments of the BCMR Medical Consultant, we recommend his records be
corrected to show he was injured in LOD and was disability discharged with
a 20 percent rating with severance pay. The Board also notes the
applicant’s willingness to forgo Reserve Retirement in favor of severance
pay with the understanding that he forfeits all claims to future retirement
pay upon reaching age 60. Accordingly, we recommend that his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. On 31 October 2003, he was found unfit to perform the duties
of his office, rank, grade, or rating by reason of physical disability,
incurred while he was entitled to receive basic pay; that the diagnosis in
his case was herniated disc L5-S1 with (chronic lumbar strain
intervertebral disc syndrome) VASRD code 5243, rated at 20%; that the
compensable percentage was 20%; that the degree of impairment was
permanent; that the disability was not due to intentional misconduct or
willful neglect; that the disability was not incurred during a period of
unauthorized absence; that the disability was received in the line of duty;
and that the disability was not a direct result of armed conflict or caused
by an instrumentality of war.
b. He was not relieved from assignment, assigned to the Retired
Reserve Section, and his name was not placed on the USAF Reserve Retired
List on 1 November 2003, but on that date, he was discharged by reason of
physical with entitlement to severance pay, with a 20% disability rating,
under the provisions of Title 10, USC, 1203 and AFI 36-3212.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 20 August 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Ms. Mary C. Puckett, Member
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
All members voted to correct the record, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-00757:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Feb 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFRC/SGP, dated 12 May 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 21 Jun 06.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 28 Jun 96, w/atchs.
Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, dated 5 Jul 06.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
The bottom line of these various documents apparently is that applicant's 1993 "In Line of Duty" (LOD) injury did not result in disability or warrant disability processing and that his February 1995 "EPTS---LOD not applicable" (not LOD) injury resulted in both his disqualification for further Reserve duty and his ineligibility for disability processing, in accordance with the applicable directives [AFI 36-2910 & AFI 36-32121. SGP determined “the [disquallfvmg] medical condition existed...
AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00608
The PEB adjudicated the low back condition as unfitting, rated 10%, with likely application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board evaluates DVA evidence proximal to separation in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness decisions and rating determinations for disability at the time of Service IPEB – Dated 20030515 Condition Code 5293 Rating 10% Herniated Lumbar Disk Combined:...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04572
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04572 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: While it is not readily apparent, it appears as though the applicant is requesting that her lower back pain condition be determined to be in the line of duty (LOD). She had five such determinations completed. Therefore, in view of the AFBCMR Medical...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01958
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01958 INDEX CODE: 108.00, 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: JOHN F. LEGRIS HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 JAN 2008 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her disability separation, with severance pay be changed to a disability retirement with a disability rating of 40 percent; in the alternative, be reinstated in...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Military Personnel Division, Air Force Reserve Command, HQ AFRC/DPM, states that there was no medical documentation provided for Headquarters Air Force Reserve Command, Surgeon General (HQ AFRC/SGPS) to review previously nor with this request for correction of military records which supports applicant’s claim that his back problems are associated with his duty in Germany. The Consultant...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-02878
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Chief, Military Personnel Division, Air Force Reserve Command, HQ AFRC/DPM, states that there was no medical documentation provided for Headquarters Air Force Reserve Command, Surgeon General (HQ AFRC/SGPS) to review previously nor with this request for correction of military records which supports applicant’s claim that his back problems are associated with his duty in Germany. The Consultant...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05881
The 2003 surgery and disc herniation was not in the line of duty, so she is predisposed for back pain/disc herniation from a pre-existing non-military back injury. On 28 Aug 07, an Informal LOD determination concluded the applicants major depressive disorder related to her back pain was in the line of duty. On 29 Aug 07, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) awarded the applicant a 100 percent combined disability rating, based upon the loss of use of both lower extremities. The...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05881
The 2003 surgery and disc herniation was not in the line of duty, so she is predisposed for back pain/disc herniation from a pre-existing non-military back injury. On 28 Aug 07, an Informal LOD determination concluded the applicants major depressive disorder related to her back pain was in the line of duty. On 29 Aug 07, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) awarded the applicant a 100 percent combined disability rating, based upon the loss of use of both lower extremities. The...
CG | BCMR | Disability Cases | 2003-087
He stated that on May 17, 2002, the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) rated his condition as 40% disabling under the Veterans Administration Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) 2 code 5293 (Intervertebral Disc Syndrome) based on the same medical evidence the Coast Guard used for its 10% disability rating under VASRD code 5295. Article 9.A.14 of COMDTINST M1850.2C (Physical Disability Evaluation System (PDES) Manual) instructs participants in the PDES to use great care in selecting a...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 02357
________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Based on the available records, the applicant served on active duty, from 13 Oct 82 to 29 Oct 92 and was transferred to the Air Force Reserve. They must have eight years of active service and have been on active duty orders for more than 30 days at the time the condition became unfitting, as subsequently determined by the PEB, and meet all other requirements set forth under the law and governing Air Force...