ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03011-2
INDEX CODE: 100.03
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment (RE) code be changed from an RE code of 2C, reenlistment
ineligible, to any RE code that begins with the number 1, reenlistment
eligible.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS
On 9 April 2003, the applicant's request to have his RE code changed from
“2C” to an RE code that would enable him to reenlist was considered and
denied by the Board. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s request, and, the rationale of the earlier
decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G.
On 17 October 2005, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration
contending his discharge was wrong in that he was not given a hearing or an
opportunity to explain. He contends his service was exceptional. To
support his request, he has provided a personal statement, a statement from
his supervisor at Northrup Grumman, a copy of his college transcript and a
copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active
Duty. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in support
of his appeal, we remain unpersuaded that the applicant’s RE code should be
changed to one that would allow him to reenlist. We carefully considered
the statements provided by the applicant and while we believe the evidence
to be new and relevant, it is not of such significance as to alter our
original decision. As previously noted, the applicant has provided no
evidence to show his discharge and the corresponding RE code he received
was erroneous or unjust. Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not
favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of probable material error or injustice; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 22 February 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit G. Record of Proceedings, dated 12 Mar 03,
with exhibits A through F.
Exhibit H. Applicant’s Letter, dated 6 Feb 05, w/atchs.
MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03244
The discharge authority approved the recommended separation and the applicant was honorably discharged on 21 Jul 80. The complete DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days on 1 Dec 06. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02606
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02606 INDEX NUMBER: 108.00 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Feb 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C,” “entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed. His adjustment disorder could have been the sole reason...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02717
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his service characterization to honorable, but it was not reflected on his RE code, which he needs changed to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). The applicant has not provided any facts to warrant a change to his discharge or RE code. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02578
________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He does not have a mental disorder and is fit to be in the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the narrative reason for the applicant’s discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority and recommends the RE code not be changed. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 6 Jun 05.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00660
The applicant’s military records contain limited documentation and do not contain his discharge package or the associated mental health evaluation supporting his discharge. There is no documentation in the case file, or in the evidence submitted by the applicant to show what diagnosis formed the basis for his administrative discharge for unsuitability. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03622
However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for his entry-level separation; i.e., entry- level performance and conduct, to be overly harsh. However, the Board finds that based on the applicant’s desire to reenter the military, his RE code should be changed to “1J.” This code provides the applicant the opportunity to apply for enlistment in any branch of the service, without requiring a waiver. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01690
The applicant’s commander recommended she be discharged under the Force Shaping Program. At the time a member is separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE Code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005- 01690 in Executive Session on 10 November 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Michael...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02767
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02767 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed to allow him to reenter military service. The complete...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03592
On 28 December 1990, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 35-10, Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, with an honorable discharge. On 28 December 1990 the applicant submitted a conditional waiver to an administrative review board contingent on receiving no less than an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00945
The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that before recommending the discharge, the applicant received counseling with a chaplain during the month of January 1997 for an incident in which he expressed suicidal ideations. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...