Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2002-03011-2
Original file (BC-2002-03011-2.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-03011-2
                                        INDEX CODE:  100.03

                                        COUNSEL:  NONE

                                        HEARING DESIRED: NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His reenlistment (RE) code be changed from an RE code  of  2C,  reenlistment
ineligible, to any RE code that  begins  with  the  number  1,  reenlistment
eligible.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS

On 9 April 2003, the applicant's request to have his RE  code  changed  from
“2C” to an RE code that would enable him  to  reenlist  was  considered  and
denied by the Board.  For an  accounting  of  the  facts  and  circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s request,  and,  the  rationale  of  the  earlier
decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit G.

On 17 October 2005, the applicant submitted a  request  for  reconsideration
contending his discharge was wrong in that he was not given a hearing or  an
opportunity to explain.   He  contends  his  service  was  exceptional.   To
support his request, he has provided a personal statement, a statement  from
his supervisor at Northrup Grumman, a copy of his college transcript  and  a
copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release  or  Discharge  from  Active
Duty.  The  applicant's  complete  submission,  with  attachments,   is   at
Exhibit H.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After again reviewing this application and the evidence provided in  support
of his appeal, we remain unpersuaded that the applicant’s RE code should  be
changed to one that would allow him to reenlist.   We  carefully  considered
the statements provided by the applicant and while we believe  the  evidence
to be new and relevant, it is not of  such  significance  as  to  alter  our
original decision.  As previously  noted,  the  applicant  has  provided  no
evidence to show his discharge and the corresponding  RE  code  he  received
was erroneous or  unjust.   Accordingly,  the  applicant’s  request  is  not
favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence  of  probable  material  error  or  injustice;  and  that  the
application  will  only  be  reconsidered  upon  the  submission  of   newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 22 February 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
      Mr. Joseph D. Yount, Member
      Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit G.  Record of Proceedings, dated 12 Mar 03,
                  with exhibits A through F.
    Exhibit H.  Applicant’s Letter, dated 6 Feb 05, w/atchs.




                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                        Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03244

    Original file (BC-2006-03244.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The discharge authority approved the recommended separation and the applicant was honorably discharged on 21 Jul 80. The complete DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force Evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days on 1 Dec 06. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02606

    Original file (BC-2006-02606.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-02606 INDEX NUMBER: 108.00 XXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Feb 08 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C,” “entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed. His adjustment disorder could have been the sole reason...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02717

    Original file (BC-2007-02717.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his service characterization to honorable, but it was not reflected on his RE code, which he needs changed to enter the Air National Guard (ANG). The applicant has not provided any facts to warrant a change to his discharge or RE code. Exhibit F. Letter, Applicant, not dated.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02578

    Original file (BC-2004-02578.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He does not have a mental disorder and is fit to be in the Air Force. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the narrative reason for the applicant’s discharge be changed to Secretarial Authority and recommends the RE code not be changed. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 6 Jun 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00660

    Original file (BC-2005-00660.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s military records contain limited documentation and do not contain his discharge package or the associated mental health evaluation supporting his discharge. There is no documentation in the case file, or in the evidence submitted by the applicant to show what diagnosis formed the basis for his administrative discharge for unsuitability. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03622

    Original file (BC-2003-03622.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for his entry-level separation; i.e., entry- level performance and conduct, to be overly harsh. However, the Board finds that based on the applicant’s desire to reenter the military, his RE code should be changed to “1J.” This code provides the applicant the opportunity to apply for enlistment in any branch of the service, without requiring a waiver. MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY Panel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01690

    Original file (BC-2005-01690.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant’s commander recommended she be discharged under the Force Shaping Program. At the time a member is separated from the Air Force, they are furnished an RE Code predicated upon the quality of their service and the circumstances of their separation. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2005- 01690 in Executive Session on 10 November 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Michael...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02767

    Original file (BC-2007-02767.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02767 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code 2C “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” be changed to allow him to reenter military service. The complete...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03592

    Original file (BC-2002-03592.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 28 December 1990, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending that he be discharged from the Air Force under the provisions of AFR 35-10, Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure, with an honorable discharge. On 28 December 1990 the applicant submitted a conditional waiver to an administrative review board contingent on receiving no less than an honorable discharge. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00945

    Original file (BC-2003-00945.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that before recommending the discharge, the applicant received counseling with a chaplain during the month of January 1997 for an incident in which he expressed suicidal ideations. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial. The evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...