ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1999-03347-2
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Under Other Than Honorable Conditions (UOTHC) discharge be
upgraded to a general discharge.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant received a UOTHC discharge on 14 December 1983 for a
Pattern of Discreditable Involvement with Military or Civil
Authorities after 1 year, 7 months, and 25 days on active duty.
On 19 January 2000, the applicant submitted an application requesting
that his discharge be upgraded to a general discharge for medical
reasons.
The applicant’s request was considered and denied by the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) on 29 August 2000
(Exhibit E).
On 30 May 2005, the applicant submitted a request for reconsideration,
again requesting that his discharge be upgraded to a general discharge
for medical reasons. To support this assertion, the applicant
provided a Readmission Psychosocial History and Assessment document.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit F.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is
attached at Exhibit G.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the
previous documentation and noting the additional documentation
submitted, we again are not convinced that the applicant’s request
should be granted. We find no impropriety in the characterization of
applicant's discharge. It appears that responsible officials applied
appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find
persuasive evidence that pertinent regulations were violated or that
applicant was not afforded all the rights to which entitled at the
time of discharge. We conclude, therefore, that the discharge
proceedings were proper and characterization of the discharge was
appropriate to the existing circumstances. Therefore, in the absence
of evidence to the contrary, we again find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did
not demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the applicant was denied without a personal appearance; and that
the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 28 February 2006, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Ms. Rita S. Looney, Member
Mr. Michael J. Novel, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit E. Record of Proceedings, dated 31 Aug 00,
w/atchs.
Exhibit F. DD Form 149, dated 30 May 05,
w/atchs.
Exhibit G. FBI Investigative Report.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC -1991-01786-2
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit F. On 1 July 2000, applicant submitted an application requesting reconsideration that his discharge be upgraded. A copy of the AFBCMR letter, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. On 26 May 2004, applicant submitted an application requesting reconsideration that his discharge be upgraded at least to a general. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-1991-01786-2 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit C (with Exhibit A). Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit D. Applicant provided a response to the FBI report, which is attached at Exhibit G. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: In earlier findings, we determined that there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action regarding the applicant’s request for upgrade of his undesirable discharge. ...
The Air Force in their advisory of 24 January 2000, indicates that in their review of the applicant’s overall record they would have no objection to upgrading applicant’s discharge to general (under honorable conditions) if a check of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) files proves negative. RICHARD A. PETERSON Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR) FROM: SAF/MI 1660 Air Force Pentagon Washington, DC...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1999-02057A
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-02057 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests that his under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge be upgraded to an honorable discharge. On 24 July 1992, the applicant submitted a request to be...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1993-00762A
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In an application, dated 15 November 1997, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application on the merits. Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit F. The application has been reopened, and forwarded to the Board for reconsideration on the merits of the case. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent...
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In an application, dated 15 November 1997, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application on the merits. Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit F. The application has been reopened, and forwarded to the Board for reconsideration on the merits of the case. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-1999-03347
The majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. The applicant’s UOTHC discharge may have been appropriate for the circumstances at the time. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-1999-03347 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section 1552,...
_________________________________________________________________ RESUME OF CASE: On 30 Sep 99, the Board considered and denied applicant’s request (Exhibit F). On 9 Mar 00 (Exhibit G), in an undated letter (Exhibit H), and on 25 Apr 00 (Exhibit I), applicant provided additional documentation and requests the Board reconsider her application. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01146
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-01146 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 19 OCT 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be upgraded to honorable. ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He request clemency and...
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. On 2 February 2000, applicant submitted a letter requesting that his RE code be changed. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit G. ____________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 August 2000, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. Therefore, we agree with the opinions...