ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00860
INDEX CODE: A83.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His undesirable discharge be upgraded.
_________________________________________________________________
RESUME OF THE CASE:
On 1 Jun 99, the Board considered and denied an application for
correction of military records pertaining to the applicant, in which
he requested that his undesirable discharge be upgraded. A complete
copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit C (with
Exhibit A).
Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided a copy of an investigation report,
which is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He is requesting reconsideration of his appeal on the basis of
clemency. The reason for his discharge was an altercation he had with
a civilian over his girlfriend. He realizes that what he did was
wrong. He was very young and foolish. However, he has suffered
tremendously over this for many years.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided several character
reference statements.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit D.
Applicant provided a response to the FBI report, which is attached at
Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
In earlier findings, we determined that there was insufficient
evidence to warrant any corrective action regarding the applicant’s
request for upgrade of his undesirable discharge. We have reviewed
the applicant’s most recent submission and find it insufficient to
warrant a reversal of our previous determination in this case. The
applicant again has not provided any evidence that the discharge
action was improper or contrary to the prevailing regulation.
Furthermore, in view of the lack of sufficient information surrounding
the circumstances of the applicant’s discharge, and the limited
documentation concerning his post-service activities, we are not
persuaded that favorable action is warranted based on clemency.
Accordingly, we find no basis to act favorably on the applicant’s
request.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice;
that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 10 Oct 00, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member
Mr. Patrick R. Wheeler, Member
The following additional documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit C. Record of Proceedings, dated 22 Jun 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, applicant, dated 30 Jun 99, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. FBI report.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated
Exhibit G. Letter, applicant, dated 13 Jun 00.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
On 04 May 2000, the applicant appeared and testified, with counsel, before the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB). Evidence of record reflects that the applicant’s bad conduct discharge was upgraded by the Air Force Discharge Review Board to under other than honorable conditions on the basis of clemency. Exhibit C. AFDRB Hearing Record, dated 18 May 00.
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Clarksburg, WV, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Separations Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that the applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing. Since his discharge occurred over 48 years ago and considering he was only 19...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00008
Pursuant to the Board's request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, WV, has provided applicant’s arrest record which is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. A copy of the FBI arrest record was forwarded to applicant on 27 February...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1993-00762A
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In an application, dated 15 November 1997, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application on the merits. Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit F. The application has been reopened, and forwarded to the Board for reconsideration on the merits of the case. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent...
A copy of the Record of Proceedings is attached at Exhibit E. In an application, dated 15 November 1997, the applicant requested reconsideration of his application on the merits. Applicant’s submission is attached at Exhibit F. The application has been reopened, and forwarded to the Board for reconsideration on the merits of the case. It appears that responsible officials applied appropriate standards in effecting the separation, and we do not find persuasive evidence that pertinent...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02764
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02764 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded. He was credited with 3 years, 7 months, and 4 days active service (excludes 197 days of lost time due to three periods of confinement). They also noted applicant did not...
On 21 Apr 80, the Board considered and denied an application pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that his records be corrected to show that he was discharged because of medical reasons (Exhibit C). Regarding the applicant’s request that his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable, we note that in earlier findings, a determination was made that there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action regarding the applicant’s request for upgrade of his...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-01344 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable. Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), Clarksburg, West Virginia, provided an investigative report which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Military Personnel Management Specialist, AFPC/DPPRS,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-03032
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03032 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His under honorable conditions (general) discharge be upgraded to honorable. Applicant was discharged on 15 Dec 72, in the grade of airman first class, under the provisions of AFM 39-12, by reason of unfitness, with service...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-01433 INDEX CODE: 106.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His 1955 Bad Conduct Discharge (BCD) be changed to an honorable or an under honorable conditions discharge. Further, given the fact that he had three court-martial convictions during his brief period of military service, we are not...