Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9900902
Original file (9900902.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  99-00902

            INDEX CODE:  107.00


            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Since he flew with the same aircrew for  28  missions  and  was  on  the  17
February 1945 mission for which the navigator of  his  aircrew  was  awarded
the DFC through the correction of record process, he should be  awarded  the
DFC.

The applicant states that on 17 February 1945, while on  a  bombing  mission
over Iwo Jima, they became aware of the huge U.S. Naval invasion.  Their  B-
24M aircraft was in the lead flight of four planes and made  a  bombing  run
approximately 5,000 feet above the invasion beach.  Then they  made  a  180˚
turn and flew over Mount Suribache at low level.  The applicant states  that
he directed his gunfire on the two airfields  and  large  anti-aircraft  gun
positions.  He started firing over Mount Suribach and did  not  let  up  for
the six-mile duration of the strafing run.  During the strafing run, he  saw
many Japanese soldiers on the two runways in and  around  the  anti-aircraft
gun pits.  After the mission, he had to replace the two  50  barrels  as  he
fired over 2,000 rounds of ammunition  and  the  aircraft  sustained  damage
from small arms, machine gun with tracers, and  larger  anti-aircraft  fire.
The former navigator of his aircrew was awarded the DFC  by  the  Board  for
his actions on 17 February 1945.

The applicant also states that during the period in question, aircrews  were
traditionally awarded the DFC upon the completion of 25 combat missions  and
he completed 27 missions.

In  support  of  the  appeal,  applicant  submits  a   copy   of   the   DEC
recommendation and the Record of Proceedings pertaining to the navigator  of
his aircrew.  In addition, the  applicant  submits  statements  from  former
members of his aircrew.

The applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s records were destroyed by fire  in  1973,  at  the  National
Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri.

The applicant was enlisted in the Army Air Force  on  19  January  1944  and
entered active duty.

The applicant served in the Asiatic and Pacific theaters of operation  as  a
B-24 Armored Gunner.  The applicant completed 27 missions  and  was  awarded
the Air Medal with 2 bronze oak leaf clusters.

On 17 February 1945, while serving as a B-24M  nose  gunner,  the  applicant
participated in a group daylight  low  level  attack  against  the  strongly
fortified enemy stronghold of Iwo Jima.

The applicant was honorably discharged in the grade  of  staff  sergeant  on
24 November 1945 for the convenience of the government (Demobilization).

On 27 November 1945, the Adjutant General’s Office requested the  Commander,
7th Air Force, inform them whether or not the applicant was entitled to  the
DFC.

On 23 March 1946, the 7th Air Force advised the Adjutant  General’s   Office
that their records did not indicate he was authorized the  DFC  by  the  7th
Air Force or Army Air Force, Middle Pacific.

On 29 October 1998, the Board favorably considered an application  submitted
by the former navigator of the applicant’s aircrew and awarded him  the  DFC
for extraordinary achievement while participating as a navigator in a  group
daylight low level attack against the strongly  fortified  enemy  stronghold
of Iwo Jima on 17 February 1945.

During World War II,  the  7th  Air  Force  had  an  established  policy  of
awarding the DFC for completion of 25 heavy bomber combat  missions  in  the
Pacific Operations Area.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The  Chief,  Awards  and  Decorations  Section,  AFPC/DPPPR,  reviewed   the
application and states the applicant has provided documentation  proving  he
was the nose gunner on the 17 February 1945 bombing mission over  Iwo  Jima.
While the statements from fellow crewmembers verify that he was  on  the  17
February 1945 mission, they do  not  specify  any  instance  of  heroism  or
extraordinary achievement  on  the  mission.   Although  the  applicant  did
submit a  recommendation  from  a  person  with  first-hand  knowledge,  the
recommendation does not present sufficient justification  or  warrant  award
of the DFC.  Therefore, they recommend denial of his request.

A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant reviewed the Air Force  evaluation  and  states  that  in  his
opinion  all  ten  aircrew  members  exhibited  heroic   and   extraordinary
achievement on the 17 February 1945 mission.  It was extraordinary  teamwork
that was the key to the success of the mission.  He implores  the  Board  to
go back in time to the era of B-24 heavy bombers and the men who strafed  an
island at low level while the enemy bombarded them  with  tracers  and  ant-
aircraft fire.

The applicant’s complete response is attached at Exhibit E.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law  or
regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed; however, it is in  the  interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Sufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of probable error or injustice.  In this  respect,  we  note  that
while on a bombing mission, participating in the first low level  attack  by
heavy bombers against the strongly fortified enemy stronghold  of  Iwo  Jima
on 17 February 1945, the applicant’s aircraft was damaged  by  anti-aircraft
fire. In support of the appeal, the applicant has provided  a  copy  of  his
flight records, showing he completed 27 combat flight missions, and that  he
was on the 17 February 1945 mission.   He  also  submitted  statements  from
fellow crewmembers, stating he was on the flight.   In view  of  the  above,
we believe the applicant’s heroic  actions  on  17 February  1945  meet  the
criteria for award of the DFC.   Therefore,  we  recommend  his  records  be
corrected to the extent indicated below.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air  Force  relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that  he  was  awarded  the  Distinguished
Flying Cross for extraordinary achievement while  participating  as  a  nose
gunner in a group daylight low level attack against the  strongly  fortified
enemy stronghold of Iwo Jima on 17 February 1945.

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 30 November 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
            Mr. Edward C. Koenig III, Member
            Mr. Gregory W. Den Herder, Member

All members voted to correct the records,  as  recommended.   The  following
documentary evidence was considered:

   Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 March 1999, w/atchs.
   Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
   Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 18 June 1999.
   Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 12 July 1999.
       Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 3 August 1999.




                 THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                 Panel Chair


AFBCMR 99-00902





MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to  APPLICANT  be  corrected  to  show  that  he  was  awarded  the
Distinguished   Flying   Cross   for   extraordinary    achievement    while
participating as a nose gunner in a group daylight low level attack  against
the strongly fortified enemy stronghold of Iwo Jima on 17 February 1945.






            JOE G. LINEBERGER
            Director
            Air Force Review Boards Agency




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY1998 | 9702750

    Original file (9702750.pdf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Although the applicant provided a written recommendation for award of the DFC for a specific mission which occurred on 1 7 February 1945, in his application he requests award of the DFC for completion of 25 combat missions. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORC E EVALUATIO N: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that at the time the written DFC recommendation was submitted, he had completed 26 missions. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073

    Original file (BC-2005-02073.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01826

    Original file (BC-2008-01826.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of his request, the applicant submits his personal statement, Congressional correspondence, recommendations from his former commander/Director of Combat Operations Fifth Air Force, narrative recommendations, proposed citations, a statement from his wingman on the 28 June 1952 mission, extracts from his personal copies of his military records to include flight records, mission reports, a copy of the only other DSC awarded in the wing, translated Russian mission reports for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03788

    Original file (BC-2011-03788.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03788 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show the award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He qualified for award of the medal several times through completion of his...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2005-01522

    Original file (bc-2005-01522.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    He should be awarded the DFC for his actions on 23 June 1952. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the AmnM is awarded for voluntary risk of life not involving actual combat and the applicant’s actions on 23 June 1952 were previously recognized in the AM he was awarded for numerous operational flights from 8 May 1953 to 23 June 1952. On 14 June 1952, he was awarded...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02299

    Original file (BC-2005-02299.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02299 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded an additional oak leaf cluster to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01991

    Original file (BC 2013 01991.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    NPRC records do not show he was awarded the Aerial Gunner Badge or the Aircrew Member Badge. However, he was awarded both since he completed training and served in a unit that completed combat missions. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the request for the Aircrew Member Badge.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02179

    Original file (BC-2005-02179.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02179 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In addition, based on the Eighth Air Force policy...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01538

    Original file (BC-2004-01538.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Therefore, the following information has been extracted from the documentation provided by applicant. Regardless, although the Eighth Air Force had an established policy from 1942 to 1944, whereby a DFC was awarded upon the completion of 25 heavy bomber missions, in 1944, the total number of missions for award of a DFC was increased from 25 to 35. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-01538 in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02293

    Original file (BC-2004-02293.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on the Eighth Air Force established policy of awarding an AM upon the completion of every five heavy bomber missions and since he completed a total of 36 combat missions, he should be awarded two additional AMs. In this respect, we note the applicant completed a total of 36 combat missions while assigned to the Eighth Air Force as a B- 24 airplane commander. ...