RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 99-00902
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Since he flew with the same aircrew for 28 missions and was on the 17
February 1945 mission for which the navigator of his aircrew was awarded
the DFC through the correction of record process, he should be awarded the
DFC.
The applicant states that on 17 February 1945, while on a bombing mission
over Iwo Jima, they became aware of the huge U.S. Naval invasion. Their B-
24M aircraft was in the lead flight of four planes and made a bombing run
approximately 5,000 feet above the invasion beach. Then they made a 180˚
turn and flew over Mount Suribache at low level. The applicant states that
he directed his gunfire on the two airfields and large anti-aircraft gun
positions. He started firing over Mount Suribach and did not let up for
the six-mile duration of the strafing run. During the strafing run, he saw
many Japanese soldiers on the two runways in and around the anti-aircraft
gun pits. After the mission, he had to replace the two 50 barrels as he
fired over 2,000 rounds of ammunition and the aircraft sustained damage
from small arms, machine gun with tracers, and larger anti-aircraft fire.
The former navigator of his aircrew was awarded the DFC by the Board for
his actions on 17 February 1945.
The applicant also states that during the period in question, aircrews were
traditionally awarded the DFC upon the completion of 25 combat missions and
he completed 27 missions.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of the DEC
recommendation and the Record of Proceedings pertaining to the navigator of
his aircrew. In addition, the applicant submits statements from former
members of his aircrew.
The applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant’s records were destroyed by fire in 1973, at the National
Personnel Records Center in St. Louis, Missouri.
The applicant was enlisted in the Army Air Force on 19 January 1944 and
entered active duty.
The applicant served in the Asiatic and Pacific theaters of operation as a
B-24 Armored Gunner. The applicant completed 27 missions and was awarded
the Air Medal with 2 bronze oak leaf clusters.
On 17 February 1945, while serving as a B-24M nose gunner, the applicant
participated in a group daylight low level attack against the strongly
fortified enemy stronghold of Iwo Jima.
The applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of staff sergeant on
24 November 1945 for the convenience of the government (Demobilization).
On 27 November 1945, the Adjutant General’s Office requested the Commander,
7th Air Force, inform them whether or not the applicant was entitled to the
DFC.
On 23 March 1946, the 7th Air Force advised the Adjutant General’s Office
that their records did not indicate he was authorized the DFC by the 7th
Air Force or Army Air Force, Middle Pacific.
On 29 October 1998, the Board favorably considered an application submitted
by the former navigator of the applicant’s aircrew and awarded him the DFC
for extraordinary achievement while participating as a navigator in a group
daylight low level attack against the strongly fortified enemy stronghold
of Iwo Jima on 17 February 1945.
During World War II, the 7th Air Force had an established policy of
awarding the DFC for completion of 25 heavy bomber combat missions in the
Pacific Operations Area.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief, Awards and Decorations Section, AFPC/DPPPR, reviewed the
application and states the applicant has provided documentation proving he
was the nose gunner on the 17 February 1945 bombing mission over Iwo Jima.
While the statements from fellow crewmembers verify that he was on the 17
February 1945 mission, they do not specify any instance of heroism or
extraordinary achievement on the mission. Although the applicant did
submit a recommendation from a person with first-hand knowledge, the
recommendation does not present sufficient justification or warrant award
of the DFC. Therefore, they recommend denial of his request.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that in his
opinion all ten aircrew members exhibited heroic and extraordinary
achievement on the 17 February 1945 mission. It was extraordinary teamwork
that was the key to the success of the mission. He implores the Board to
go back in time to the era of B-24 heavy bombers and the men who strafed an
island at low level while the enemy bombarded them with tracers and ant-
aircraft fire.
The applicant’s complete response is attached at Exhibit E.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest
of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of probable error or injustice. In this respect, we note that
while on a bombing mission, participating in the first low level attack by
heavy bombers against the strongly fortified enemy stronghold of Iwo Jima
on 17 February 1945, the applicant’s aircraft was damaged by anti-aircraft
fire. In support of the appeal, the applicant has provided a copy of his
flight records, showing he completed 27 combat flight missions, and that he
was on the 17 February 1945 mission. He also submitted statements from
fellow crewmembers, stating he was on the flight. In view of the above,
we believe the applicant’s heroic actions on 17 February 1945 meet the
criteria for award of the DFC. Therefore, we recommend his records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the Distinguished
Flying Cross for extraordinary achievement while participating as a nose
gunner in a group daylight low level attack against the strongly fortified
enemy stronghold of Iwo Jima on 17 February 1945.
The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive
Session on 30 November 1999, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Panel Chair
Mr. Edward C. Koenig III, Member
Mr. Gregory W. Den Herder, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 March 1999, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 18 June 1999.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MIBR, dated 12 July 1999.
Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 3 August 1999.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 99-00902
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was awarded the
Distinguished Flying Cross for extraordinary achievement while
participating as a nose gunner in a group daylight low level attack against
the strongly fortified enemy stronghold of Iwo Jima on 17 February 1945.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Although the applicant provided a written recommendation for award of the DFC for a specific mission which occurred on 1 7 February 1945, in his application he requests award of the DFC for completion of 25 combat missions. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORC E EVALUATIO N: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and states that at the time the written DFC recommendation was submitted, he had completed 26 missions. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02073
The SAFPC evaluation is at Exhibit F. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states, among other things, that but for the applicant’s actions on 5 June 1944, the mission’s command pilot would have been in severe shock and unconscious in a matter of minutes and incapable of the aircraft flight maneuvers for which he was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Based on the established 8th Air Force policy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2008-01826
In support of his request, the applicant submits his personal statement, Congressional correspondence, recommendations from his former commander/Director of Combat Operations Fifth Air Force, narrative recommendations, proposed citations, a statement from his wingman on the 28 June 1952 mission, extracts from his personal copies of his military records to include flight records, mission reports, a copy of the only other DSC awarded in the wing, translated Russian mission reports for...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-03788
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2011-03788 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to show the award of the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He qualified for award of the medal several times through completion of his...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | bc-2005-01522
He should be awarded the DFC for his actions on 23 June 1952. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the AmnM is awarded for voluntary risk of life not involving actual combat and the applicant’s actions on 23 June 1952 were previously recognized in the AM he was awarded for numerous operational flights from 8 May 1953 to 23 June 1952. On 14 June 1952, he was awarded...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02299
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02299 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 2 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded an additional oak leaf cluster to the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01991
NPRC records do not show he was awarded the Aerial Gunner Badge or the Aircrew Member Badge. However, he was awarded both since he completed training and served in a unit that completed combat missions. The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. USAF/A3O-AIF recommends approval of the request for the Aircrew Member Badge.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02179
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02179 INDEX NUMBER: 107.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: ROBERT L. ASTON XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Jan 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and two additional oak leaf clusters to the Air Medal (AM). In addition, based on the Eighth Air Force policy...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01538
Therefore, the following information has been extracted from the documentation provided by applicant. Regardless, although the Eighth Air Force had an established policy from 1942 to 1944, whereby a DFC was awarded upon the completion of 25 heavy bomber missions, in 1944, the total number of missions for award of a DFC was increased from 25 to 35. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-01538 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02293
_________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Based on the Eighth Air Force established policy of awarding an AM upon the completion of every five heavy bomber missions and since he completed a total of 36 combat missions, he should be awarded two additional AMs. In this respect, we note the applicant completed a total of 36 combat missions while assigned to the Eighth Air Force as a B- 24 airplane commander. ...