RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-02043
INDEX CODE: 110.02, 128.10
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 1 Jan 07
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed to one that
does not require recoupment of the unearned portion of his Initial
Enlistment Bonus (IEB).
[Note: The applicant’s SPD code was administratively changed, but it
still allows recoupment of the IEB - See Statement of Facts.]
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was not provided nor did he sign a Statement of Understanding
regarding recoupment.
The Area Defense Counsel (ADC) at Hanscom AFB, MA, who represented the
applicant in his discharge action, provided a statement indicating he
had advised the applicant that recoupment action might not be
initiated since he was not provided nor did he sign a Statement of
Understanding regarding recoupment. He provided such advice based on
his experience as an Air Force attorney.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 18 Dec 01, for a
six-year term, and was authorized an IEB of approximately $4000.00.
He initialed and signed AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment
Agreement, which states in Block A: “I further understand, as defined
by the Department of Defense Military Pay and Allowance Entitlements
Manual, that should I voluntarily or involuntarily not complete the
term of obligated service for which the bonus is paid, or should I not
maintain qualification in the bonus AFSC [Air Force Specialty Code], I
may be required to repay the unearned portion of the bonus.”
The applicant was originally assigned to the 963rd Airborne Air
Command Squadron (963 AACS) at Tinker AFB, OK, as an airborne
surveillance technician. Around 28 Sep 04, he was assigned to the 6th
Security Forces Squadron (6 SFS) at MacDill AFB, FL, as an
installation entry controller.
According to a Treatment Summary and Recommendation, dated 5 Apr 05,
by the 6th Medical Operations Squadron clinical psychologist, the
applicant was hospitalized at Memorial Hospital for suicidal ideation
on 31 Jan 05 and first seen in the Life Skills Support Center (LSSC)
after being discharged from the hospital on 2 Feb 05. Over the next
two months, the applicant engaged in weekly individual psychotherapy
sessions and bi-weekly medication management sessions. He also
participated in a six-week anger management group. Although the
applicant had been adherent with all treatment recommendations, he
continued to experience significant symptoms of anxiety and
depression. As a result, he was again hospitalized for suicidal
ideation on 8 Mar 05 for a period of six days. The symptoms appeared
to be exacerbated by his current employment situation and did not
appear to be responding to medical treatment. If he remained in his
current life situation, he more than likely would continue to
experience significant anxiety and depression as well as suicidal
ideation. The Diagnosis was Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety
and Depressed Mood; occupational problems, minimal social support.
The evaluation opined that the applicant manifested an adjustment
disorder so severe that his ability to function effectively in the
military environment was significantly impaired. There was no medical
condition warranting processing under the disability evaluation
system, and he was worldwide qualified. Recommendation was that he be
separated.
On 18 May 05, the 6 SFS commander notified the applicant of his intent
to recommend an honorable discharge for Conditions that Interfere with
Military Service: Mental Disorders - Adjustment Disorders. The
commander cited the 5 Apr 05 mental health evaluation and the
information contained therein as the reason for his action. The
notification letter also advised the applicant that, if discharged,
any special pay, bonus, or education assistance funds may be subject
to recoupment. The applicant acknowledged receipt, consulted counsel,
and waived his right to submit matters on his behalf.
Also on 18 May 05, the applicant signed a Statement of Understanding
Regarding Recoupment of Education Assistance, Special Pay, or Bonuses.
He indicated his understanding that the Air Force was entitled to
recoup a portion of education assistance, special pay, or bonus money
which he received if he separated before completing the period of
active duty he agreed to serve [six years].
On 23 May 05, the commander recommended the applicant be honorably
discharged, without probation and rehabilitation (P&R). The applicant
consulted counsel and waived his right to submit statements. The case
was found legally sufficient on 25 May 05, with recommendation for an
honorable discharge without P&R.
The discharge authority approved the recommendations on 25 May 05, and
ordered the applicant’s discharge for Mental Disorders - Adjustment
Disorder.
On 3 Jun 05, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of
senior airman after 3 years, 5 months, and 15 days of active service.
His SPD code was “JFX” for “Personality Disorder.”
However, on 28 Jul 05, HQ AFPC/DPPRSP notified the applicant that his
SPD code was administratively changed to “JFF” for “Secretarial
Authority.” This action was taken based on the fact the applicant was
not diagnosed with a “Personality Disorder” but rather with an
“Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood.” [Note:
There is no SPD code specifically for Adjustment Disorders; it is
included under the “umbrella” code of “Personality Disorder.”]
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAES cites the two documents signed by the applicant
indicating his understanding of recoupment action if he did not
complete his term of enlistment (TOE). Based on the documentation,
the applicant did not complete his six-year TOE and was aware that the
unused portion of the IEB would be recouped. Denial is recommended.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPRS defers to HQ AFPC/DPPAE regarding the recoupment
requirement. Based on the documentation on file in the master
personnel records, the applicant’s discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation.
The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority and
the applicant’s request should be denied.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Complete copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the
applicant on 5 Aug 05 for review and comment within 30 days. As of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
applicant’s military personnel record and his appeal submission, we
are not persuaded his SPD code should be changed to one that would not
recoup the unearned portion of his IEB. The contentions made by the
applicant and his ADC were duly noted; however, we do not find these
assertions, in and by themselves, sufficiently persuasive to override
the evidence of record and the rationale provided by the Air Force.
The applicant’s SPD code was administratively changed to “JFF” because
he was diagnosed with Adjustment Disorder and there is no SPD code for
that specific condition other than the “umbrella” code for Personality
Disorder. However, the new code does not set aside the recoupment
action. Contrary to the ADC’s assertions, the applicant did, in fact,
acknowledge that he understood the unearned portion of his IEB would
be recouped if he did not complete his term of enlistment when he
signed his enlistment contract on 18 Dec 01, and the Statement of
Understanding on 18 May 05. He was further advised of the possibility
of bonus recoupment in the commander’s 18 May 05 Notification Letter.
We therefore agree with the recommendations of the Air Force and adopt
the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has not sustained his burden of having suffered either an
error or an injustice. In view of the above and absent persuasive
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend
granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 20 October 2005 under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Kathleen F. Graham, Panel Chair
Mr. James A. Wolffe, Member
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Member
The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2005-02043 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 21 Jun 05, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAES, dated 25 Jul 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 28 Jul 05.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 5 Aug 05.
KATHLEEN F. GRAHAM
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01424
The AFPC/DPPRS complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends the requested relief be approved. DPPAE states based on the applicant’s reason for separation, relief should be granted in recoupment of the unearned portion of his bonus. After a thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel record and documentation provided in support of his appeal, we are not persuaded his SPD code should be changed to one that would not require the recoupment of the unearned portion of his IEB.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01677
The Board noted that the Air Force Separations Branch was unable to determine the propriety of the separation. Nevertheless, we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force Reenlistments office that the applicant’s request should be granted based on the governing directive in effect at the time of his separation. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04111
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-04111 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The “JCR” (Weight Control Failure) separation program designator (SPD) code he received be fixed or upgraded so he is not required to pay back the bonus he received when he enlisted in the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-00898
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00898 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 SEP 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His separation program designator (SPD) code of “JFF” be changed to one that would not require him to repay his enlistment bonus. On 9 Jul 03, the office of the Staff Judge Advocate found...
The applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of airman first class on 15 Feb 00 for Personality Disorder. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE advised that the applicant received a $4000.00 IEB. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that recoupment action of the IEB should be stopped.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01147
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She came in the Air Force to perform in a particular Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC). After nearly two years of service, she was medically disqualified from the AFSC. Enlistment bonuses are recoupable provided the member is separating voluntarily, or is being separated for misconduct, or for other specified administrative reasons.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00780
She did not receive any notice of the debt during the eight months after her separation from the Air Force. JA states the Air Force Shaping Program provided certain individuals with an opportunity to voluntarily opt out of their enlistments on the condition that they repay any bonuses received. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and applicant’s submission, we are not persuaded that the applicant should be given the relief requested.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-00208
In support of his application, he provided a personal statement and a copy of his separation documentation. The AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit C. DFAS-POCC/DE indicated that based on circumstances of the applicant’s discharge, an enlistment bonus recoupent of $10,147.23 was required. ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 13 November 2002, under the provisions of AFI...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01674
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01674 INDEX CODE: 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and Separation Program Designator (SPD) code be changed from “Pregnancy” to “Medically Disqualified not for Cause.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03278
The applicant was disqualified from the electronics career field before completion of technical training and was reclassified in the AFSC 3C031 (computer communications) which at the time did not offer a bonus. The Board notes the applicant signed and initialed an enlistment agreement for payment of an $5,000.00 Initial Enlistment Bonus upon completion of technical training in the Air Force Specialty Code 2E131. He was disqualified from this career field before completion of...