Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01526
Original file (BC-2005-01526.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2005-01526
                                       INDEX CODE:  128.05
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX                   COUNSEL: NONE

      XXXXXXXXXXXX                           HEARING DESIRED:  NO

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  9 November 2006

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded a Selected Reserve  Enlistment  Bonus  for  the  2T2X1  career
field (Cargo Processor).

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Following an eight-year break in service, he reenlisted  in  the  Air  Force
Reserve into a different  Air  Force  Specialty  Code  (AFSC)  than  in  his
previous enlistment.  Reenlistment in his new AFSC offered  a  bonus  to  be
paid over six years.  He was never told that he was ineligible to receive  a
bonus by his recruiter or any other personnel during his  inprocessing.   He
is willing to take the six-year reenlistment minus  the  equivalent  of  one
year partial pay, since he was paid for the one  good  year  of  his  second
term.

In support of his application, the applicant submits a  personal  statement.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving as a staff  sergeant  in  the  Air  Force
Reserve with a date of enlistment of 27  February  2004,  a  paydate  of  13
March 1992, and a projected date of separation of  26  February  2010.   His
date of rank is 14 March 2000 with an effective date of  27  February  2004.
His current term of enlistment is six years.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFRC/DPM recommends denial.  DPM states the applicant  was  approved  for  a
reenlistment bonus on 23 July 1995; however, he requested to  be  reassigned
to a non-participating status during the second  year  of  his  reenlistment
for personal reasons.  The applicant was paid a bonus  of  $833.33  for  his
first year and a partial payment of $125.02 for  the  partial  second  year.
His reenlistment bonus was terminated upon his request for  reassignment  (1
May 1997).

DPM states the applicant does not meet eligibility requirements  to  receive
a reenlistment bonus for his 27 February 2004 reenlistment  because  he  did
not reenlist within six months of his previous expiration  term  of  service
(22 July 2001) and he had previously received a reenlistment bonus.

The ARPC/DPM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 3  June
2005, for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date,  this  office
has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of an error or injustice.  We note the applicant’s assertion  that
he should be given a Selected Reserve Reenlistment Bonus for enlisting  into
the 2T2X1 career field; however, he has not provided  any  evidence  showing
he was entitled to a  Selected  Reserve  Reenlistment  Bonus.   We  find  no
evidence  the  applicant  was  miscounseled  or  that  he  was  treated  any
differently from other similarly  situated  members.   Therefore,  we  agree
with the opinions and recommendations of the Air  Force  office  of  primary
responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion  that
the  applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error   or   injustice.
Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 18 October 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

            Ms. Charlene M. Bradley, Panel Chair
            Mr. Richard K. Hartley, Member
            Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member


The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR  Docket  Number  BC-2005-01526
was considered:

      Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 May 05, w/atch.
      Exhibit B.  Letter, AFRC/DPM, not dated, w/atchs.
      Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jun 05.




                                  CHARLENE M. BRADLEY
                                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2001-02949

    Original file (BC-2001-02949.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In order to qualify for the bonus, members in this AFSC located at McGuire had to reenlist for a period of six years (the applicant had reenlisted for two years on 13 Sep 01). In a letter dated 5 Oct 01 (Exhibit A), the UCA advised he had intended to counsel the applicant to delay reenlisting until the new bonus list came out on 1 Oct 01 to see if her AFSC would be on it. However, she was no longer eligible for the reenlistment bonus as she had since been reassigned to Willow Grove ARB...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03679

    Original file (BC-2005-03679.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPM states the applicant voluntarily did not complete his term of enlistment; therefore, SRB termination and recoupment is mandatory. The DPPRSR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He feels he is due the SRB money for his EAD time in the Reserve and while on his AGR tour because he has continued to serve in the 1C6XX career field. Even though he is in the Air Force Reserve, he is still...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-01556

    Original file (BC-2007-01556.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibits C, D and F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The 349th MSS/DPMS recommends the applicant be authorized to reenlist into the Air Force Reserve retroactively to his gain date in order to qualify for the Reserve Bonus Incentive program or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00902

    Original file (BC-2003-00902.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was promoted to 1st lieutenant (0-2) on 6 July 1997 and was promoted to captain on 1 October 2001 by the FY02 AFRES Captain Promotion Board. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02514

    Original file (BC-2007-02514.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letters prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force at Exhibits B & F. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFRC/A1BR recommends approval. JA concludes there is no authority for continuing reenlistment bonus payments after a reservist voluntarily leaves his bonus-related position. The complete JA...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00946

    Original file (BC-2005-00946.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Given the implementation date for the increase of the bonus amounts was established as 1 June 2003, the applicant did in fact receive the bonus amount for which he was eligible at the time of his enlistment on 24 February 2003; thus, not warranting a change to the current bonus amount authorized for the applicant. Because the applicant was not properly advised concerning the effective date of the prior service enlistment bonus, he was notified that, due to his enlistment date, he was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03854

    Original file (BC-2004-03854.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFRC/DPM recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that they sincerely apologize for the incorrect information applicant received; however, he received the prior service enlistment bonus amount authorized at the time of his enlistment. He enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 1 June 2003, rather than 22 March 2003, for a period of six (6) years; and at the time of his enlistment on 1 June...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02022

    Original file (BC-2004-02022.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2004-02022 INDEX CODE: 126.04 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: JEFFREY E. CHOSTNER XXXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 Dec 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Article 15, Uniformed Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), imposed on 3 February 2000 be set aside and his Enlisted Performance Report...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2000-02768A

    Original file (BC-2000-02768A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 24 October 2002, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) considered applicant’s request that the Article 15 imposed on 16 February 1994, and the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 30 April 1998, be removed from his records and he be sent to a Replacement Training Unit (RTU) to be re-qualified and reinstated in an active status as an Air National Guard (ANG) fighter pilot in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY1999 | 9800590

    Original file (9800590.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-00590 (Case 3) INDEX CODE: 107.00, 111.00 COUNSEL: AREA DEFENSE COUNSEL HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Letter of Evaluation (LOE), AF Form 77 (Supplemental Evaluation Sheet), dated 7 Sep 96, be removed from his records; and, that he be provided a letter of apology from the evaluator (Lt Col K---) of...