RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01307
INDEX CODE: 128.14
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 OCTOBER 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect enrollment in the Enlisted College
Loan Repayment Program (ECLRP).
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
There was supposed to be an amendment made by his recruiter stating
that he wanted to be enrolled in the CLRP Program.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a personal statement.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Delayed Entry/Enlistment Program (DEP) on 14
November 2002 and enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 3Â June 2003 in
the grade of airman basic, for a period of six years.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the applicant be denied. Based on all the
enlistment documents submitted by the applicant, no proof to support
his claim and the AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement,
clearly reflects that the applicant elected to not participate or was
not qualified.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 3 June 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, a majority of the Board does not find his uncorroborated
assertions of miscounseling sufficiently persuasive to override the
rationale provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility.
In this respect, a majority notes that, at the time of enlistment, the
applicant initialed indicating he was counseled on the CLRP option and
elected not to participate in the program. A majority of the Board,
therefore, agrees with the recommendation of the Air Force office of
primary responsibility and concludes that the applicant has failed to
sustain his burden that he has suffered either an error or injustice.
In view of the above and absent evidence to the contrary, a majority
finds no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or
injustice and recommends the application be denied.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 25 August and 12 September 2005, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Panel Chair
Ms. Jean A. Reynolds, Member
Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member
By a majority vote, the Board recommended denial of the application.
Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff voted to correct the records but does not
desire to submit a Minority Report. The following documentary
evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2005-01307 was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Apr 05, w/atch.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPAE, dated 18 May 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jun 05.
GREGORY H. PETKOFF
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2005-01307
MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD
FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS (AFBCMR)
SUBJECT: AFBCMR Application of
I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the
recommendation of the Board members. A majority found that applicant
had not provided substantial evidence of error or injustice and
recommended the case be denied. I concur with that finding and their
conclusion that relief is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their
recommendation that the application be denied.
Please advise the applicant accordingly.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03847
In this respect, the Board majority noted that, at the time of enlistment, the applicant initialed indicating he was counseled on the CLRP option and elected not to participate in the program. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. B. J. WHITE-OLSON Panel Chair MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00737
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00737 INDEX CODE: 128.14 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 3 SEPTEMBER 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to permit his participation in the College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP) and remain eligible for the Montgomery GI Bill (MGIB). If the Board grants the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00448
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPAE recommends the application be denied. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). In this respect, we note that, at the time of enlistment, the applicant initialed indicating she was counseled on the CLRP option and elected not to participate in the program.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00257
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was told by her recruiter that she would be able to participate in the CLRP program and further told that once she provided a promissory letter the Air Force would automatically pay for her loan. _________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Applicant entered the delayed enlistment program on 18 Sep 02 and enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 13 May 03. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03889
According to information contained in her military personnel file, the applicant signed Annex A and Annex B to her enlistment contract on 21 Oct 02. In this respect, we note that, documents contained in her military personnel records reflect that at the time of her enlistment, she initialed indicating she was counseled on the CLRP option and elected not to participate. Novel, Panel Chair Mr. Grover L. Dunn, Member Ms. Jan Mulligan, Member The following documentary evidence was...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03539
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He initially wanted to join the Air Force Reserves until he saw that the active duty Air Force was offering ECLRP as an enlistment incentive. In this respect, the applicant contends that prior to entry into the military service it was his initial intent to enlist in the Air Force Reserves, but once he gained knowledge of the CLRP incentive he decided to enlist in the Regular Air Force solely for...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01353
DPPEA states individuals who do not qualify within the established CLRP policy and do not have CLRP annexed into their enlistment agreement, and cannot substantiate a claim of error or injustice with evidence should be denied enrollment. After careful review of the evidence provided and the statement provided by the Air Force Recruiter, that there was an oversight in not adding the College Loan Repayment Program to the applicant’s enlistment contract, we believe the requested relief should...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00113
Based on all the facts presented by the applicant, DPPAES believes she was well aware at her time of entry into active duty that she was not eligible to be enrolled into the MGIB. After reviewing the evidence of record, we do believe the applicant has been the victim of an injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that on...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02331
His reenlistment contract shows he was eligible to receive a Zone A, Multiple 4 SRB based on 4 years of service. However, based on the evidence of record, the Board majority is not persuaded that the applicant has been a victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: A majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01166
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. A majority found that the applicant had not provided sufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommended the case be denied.