RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00579
INDEX CODE: 112.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 21 AUGUST 2006
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2B be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was discharged for unruly decisions and feels he deserves the
right for further employment opportunities at the civilian level for
personal fulfillment.
Applicant did not provide any documents in support of the appeal.
Applicant's complete submission, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 26 April 2000 for a
period of six years. He received three Enlisted Performance Reports
(EPRs) closing 25 December 2001, 25 December 2002 and 25 May 2003, in
which the overall evaluations were “4,” “3,” and “4.”
On 4 September 2003, applicant’s commander notified him that he was
recommending him for discharge from the Air Force for minor
disciplinary infractions. The commander recommended applicant
receive an under honorable conditions (general) discharge based on
the following. Three Records of Individual Counseling (ROCs) for
failure to go to his appointed place of duty. An Article 15 dated 7
May 2002, for operating a vehicle while the alcohol concentration in
his breath was 0.10 grams of alcohol per 210 liters of breath or
greater. Punishment consisted of reduction to the grade of airman,
forfeiture of $200.00 pay per month for two months, suspended until 6
November 2002, after which time it will be remitted without further
action, unless sooner vacated. An Article 15 dated 10 August 2003,
for dereliction in the performance of his duties in that he
negligently failed to have the applicable technical order in hand
while performing an aileron actuator removal and installation and
failure to obey a lawful order to wear proper personal protection
equipment while performing his duties. Punishment consisted of
reduction to the grade of airman basic. Four Letters of Reprimand
(LORs), one for failure to report for weekend duty, and three for
failure to go to his appointed place of duty.
The applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification of discharge
and after consulting with legal counsel he submitted statements in
his own behalf. The base legal office reviewed the case and found it
legally sufficient to support the separation and recommended
applicant be discharged with an under honorable conditions (general)
discharge without probation and rehabilitation. The discharge
authority approved the separation and directed that applicant be
discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge
without probation and rehabilitation.
Applicant was separated from the Air Force on 24 September 2003 under
the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen
(misconduct), with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge.
He had served 3 years, 4 months and 29 days on active duty. He
received a reenlistment eligibility code of 2B, “Separated with a
general or under other than honorable conditions (UOTHC) discharge.”
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS states that the discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation.
The discharge was within the discretion of the discharge authority.
A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 4 March 2005, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. The applicant’s RE code had its
basis in his involuntary discharge for misconduct. There is no
indication in the evidence provided that the information in the
discharge case file was erroneous, his substantial rights were
violated or his commander’s abused their discretionary authority. In
the absence of such evidence, the applicant’s request for a change to
his RE code is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 17 May 2005, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. B. J. White-Olson, Panel Chair
Ms. Patricia R. Collins, Member
Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Feb 05.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 28 Feb 05.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Mar 05.
B.J. WHITE-OLSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01516
As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). The evidence of record indicates the applicant was given a general discharge for misconduct. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02150
The applicant was discharged effective 20 October 1970 with a general (under honorable conditions) characterization of service. On 26 July 2000, the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR) considered and disapproved the applicant’s request to change his discharge to a disability separation (Exhibit F). _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00143
The commander was recommending applicant receive an under honorable conditions (general) discharge based on the following: (1) On 7 February 1983, 1 October 1982, 28 September 1982, 29 June 1982, and 9 October 1981, he received individual counseling for failure to go at the time prescribed. The base legal office found the case to be legally sufficient to support separation and recommended applicant be discharged with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without probation and...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01745
The administrative discharge board convened on 26 April 2001 and recommended applicant receive an under other than honorable conditions discharge without probation and rehabilitation. The Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) denied applicant’s request for upgrade of discharge to honorable and change of reason for discharge on 10 January 2002 (Exhibit B). On 27 June 2002, the Air Force Discharge Review Board again considered all the evidence of record and concluded that the overall...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01791
On 11 August 1964, applicant was notified that the commander was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force as an unsuitable airman under the provisions of Section B, AFR 39-16, and that he be furnished a general discharge. The evaluation officer recommended applicant be discharged from the Air Force with an under honorable conditions (general) discharge without being subject to the rehabilitation program. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00198
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00198 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 JULY 2006 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4B be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01463
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01463 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 6 JANUARY 2007 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded. On 22 May 80, the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged and issued a General...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01293
On 22 April 1998, his commander notified the applicant that he was being recommended for discharge due to his failure in Alcohol Abuse Treatment. The applicant was discharged effective 3 May 1998 with a honorable characterization of service, a separation code of HPD (Alcohol Rehabilitation Failure) and a reentry code of 2c (involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge). On 20 June 2005, the Air Force Personnel Center Separations Branch issued a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00014
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00014 INDEX CODE: 110.02 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02519
On 28 October 2003, the applicant’s commander notified her that he was recommending discharge from the Air Force for a condition that interfered with military service, specifically for mental disorders. Upon examination, she was diagnosed with an adjustment disorder and separation proceedings were thereafter initiated. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 4 October 2005,...