RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03840
(CASE 3)
INDEX CODES: 110.03, 131.01,
131.09
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 Jun 06
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be reinstated to active duty, effective 1 Mar 98, with all back pay
and allowances.
He be promoted to the grade of major as though selected by the
Calendar Year 1998 (CY98) Major Board.
He be provided special consideration for subsequent promotion to the
grade of lieutenant colonel by either directly promoting him to
lieutenant colonel based on what would have been his in-the primary
zone (IPZ) board, or he be given additional IPZ consideration on
future boards.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While he was on active duty, he was considered for promotion to major
by the Calendar Year 1996 (CY96) and Calendar Year 1997 (CY97) Major
Boards but was nonselected. He was not offered selective continuation
following the CY97 board, and was involuntarily separated from active
duty. Following the removal of a disputed Officer Performance Report
(OPR), he was provided Special Selection Board (SSB) consideration for
promotion to major by the CY96 and CY97 boards. Although he was
nonselected, he was selected for continuation, which he accepted.
During the initial continuation period, he would have been considered
for promotion by the CY98, Calendar Year 1999 (CY99), and the Calendar
Year 2000 (CY00) boards. If nonselected for promotion by the CY98
board, he would have been offered continuation to 20 years of active
service. Therefore, he should be reinstated to active duty as though
he had never been separated. Further, had he not been separated from
active duty, he would have been considered for promotion every year.
Therefore, SSB consideration for all subsequent years would have been
appropriate. However, because he has no OPRs or Promotion
Recommendation Forms (PRFs), he would not be competitive for
promotion. Thus, he requests reinstatement at his current rank of
major, and that his date of rank (DOR) be adjusted appropriately.
After he is reinstated, whether or not his DOR is adjusted, he would
not be able to be competitive for promotion to lieutenant colonel
because he has not been eligible to hold positions and does not have
OPRs that would make him competitive. Therefore, he should be
provided special consideration by promoting him directly or affording
him addition consideration.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an expanded
statement, and documentation pertaining to his correction of records,
SSBs and selective continuation.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was honorably discharged on 28 Feb 98 under the provisions
of AFI 36-3207 (Nonselection Permanent Promotion). He was credited
with 12 years, 3 months, and 13 days of active service.
On 14 Aug 02, the Board considered and denied an application
pertaining to the applicant, in which he requested that his Officer
Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 9 Jul 93 through 22
Aug 94 be declared void and removed from his records; his OPR rendered
for the period 23 Aug 94 through 15 Jul 95 be declared void and
removed from his records; his PRF prepared for consideration by the
CY96A Central Major Selection Board be declared void and removed from
his records; his PRF prepared for consideration by the CY97C Central
Major Selection Board be declared void and removed from his records;
he be provided SSB consideration for promotion to the grade of major
in-the-primary zone; if selected for promotion to major, he be
reinstated to active duty as of the date of his separation (28 Feb
98), and his promotion be effective as of the date it would have been
effective had he been promoted in-the-primary zone; he receive back
pay and allowances in the grade of major from the date of his
promotion to the date of his reinstatement; he receive time in grade
for pay, promotion, and retirement purposes from the date of his
promotion to the date of his reinstatement; all evidence of a Naval
Service Flying Evaluation Board (FENAB), dated 27 Jul 94, be expunged
from his records; and, if not selected for promotion by an SSB, he be
selectively continued as a pilot in the rank of captain from the date
of his separation with all back pay and allowances and credit for time
in grade for pay, promotion, and retirement purposes (Exhibit C).
On 23 Feb 04, the Board considered an application pertaining to the
applicant, in which he requested that his OPR rendered for the period
23 Aug 94 through 15 Jul 95 be declared void and removed from his
records; and, any and all actions as a result of the OPR be
invalidated such as: his OPR rendered for the period 9 Jul 93 through
22 Aug 94 be declared void and removed from his records; his PRF
prepared for consideration by the CY96A Central Major Selection Board
be declared void and removed from his records; his PRF prepared for
consideration by the CY97C Central Major Selection Board be declared
void and removed from his records; he be reinstated to active duty as
of the date of his separation; he be given SSB consideration for
promotion to the grade of major; and, he receive back pay, benefits,
and credit toward retirement for all the active duty time he would
have served. The majority of the Board recommended denial of his
appeal. The Director, Air Force Review Boards Agency, agreed with the
minority member that relief was warranted and directed the applicant’s
OPR closing 15 Jul 95 and his PRFs prepared for the CY96A and CY97C
Major Boards be voided and removed from his records, and he be given
SSB consideration (Exhibit D).
On 13 Sep 04, the applicant was given SSB consideration for promotion
to the grade of major by the CY96A and CY97C Major Boards. Although
he was nonselected for promotion, he was selected for continuation for
an initial three-year period. On 7 Dec 04, the applicant accepted the
initial continuation offer.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPO indicated that if the applicant had remained on active
duty, he would have been eligible for the CY98 Major Board and if
nonselected, would have been offered continuation to 20 years of
active service or retirement eligibility. If he would have been
selected for promotion to major by the CY98 board, he would have
received a DOR and effective date of 1 Sep 98 and would have been IPZ
eligible for promotion to lieutenant colonel by the CY02B lieutenant
colonel board. Based on the evidence provided, they impose no
objection to the applicant’s return to active duty effective 1 Mar 98.
In addition, in order to make him competitive for future promotions,
they concur with his reinstatement to active duty with promotion to
major. However, they recommend his DOR not be backdated as though
selected by an earlier board, but that he retain his current DOR of 1
Oct 02. This would allow him to build a competitive record for
promotion to lieutenant colonel. They do not support direct promotion
to lieutenant colonel at this time.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and furnished a response
indicating he concurred with the recommendation he be reinstated to
active duty effective 1 Mar 98 at his current grade and DOR.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit G.
_________________________________________________________________
ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPO provided another advisory indicating that because the
applicant was competitively selected for promotion to major by a
Reserve central promotion board, it is possible with additional
reports in his record, he could have been promoted to major by an
active duty board at some time later in his career. Therefore, they
recommend the applicant be promoted to major by the CY02A Major
Central Selection Board with a DOR and effective date of 1 Oct 02.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit H.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Applicant provided a response indicating the advisory appeared to be
only an expanded explanation of AFPC/DPPPO’s previous recommendation
of his case. As such, he saw no reason to change his position.
Therefore, he agrees with the recommendation to reinstate him to
active duty as of 1 Mar 98, with an active duty promotion to major
effective 1 Oct 02.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit J.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After a careful and thorough
analysis of the facts and circumstances of this case, and the apparent
concurrence of the applicant, we agree with the latter recommended
relief proffered by AFPC/DPPPO. In our view, such corrective action
is proper and fitting relief. Accordingly, we recommend that the
applicant’s records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that:
a. He was not discharged from all appointments on 28 Feb 98,
but was continued on active duty and was ordered Permanent Change of
Station (PCS) to his home of record (home of selection) pending
further orders.
b. He was selected for promotion to the grade of major by the
Calendar Year 2002A (CY02A) Major Central Selection Board, and that
action be initiated to obtain Senate confirmation.
c. Upon Senate confirmation, he be promoted to the grade of
major effective and with a date of rank of 1 Oct 02.
d. Any nonselections for promotion to the grade of lieutenant
colonel prior to receiving a minimum of two Officer Performance
Reports (OPRs) with at least 250 days of supervision, in the grade of
major, be set aside.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2004-03840 in Executive Session on 24 Mar 05 and 13 Jun 05, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member
Mr. Alan A. Blomgren, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Dec 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Record of Proceedings, dated 11 Sep 02.
Exhibit D. Memorandum for Executive Director,
dated 30 Mar 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit E. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 6 Jan 05.
Exhibit F. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Jan 05.
Exhibit G. Letter, applicant, dated 19 Jan 05.
Exhibit H. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 26 Apr 05.
Exhibit I. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 27 Apr 05.
Exhibit J. Letter, applicant, dated 27 Apr 05.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-03840
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that:
a. He was not discharged from all appointments on
28 Feb 98, but was continued on active duty and was ordered Permanent
Change of Station (PCS) to his home of record (home of selection)
pending further orders.
b. He was selected for promotion to the grade of major by
the Calendar Year 2002A (CY02A) Major Central Selection Board, and
that action be initiated to obtain Senate confirmation.
c. Upon Senate confirmation, he be promoted to the grade
of major effective and with a date of rank of 1 Oct 02.
d. Any nonselections for promotion to the grade of
lieutenant colonel prior to receiving a minimum of two Officer
Performance Reports (OPRs) with at least 250 days of supervision, in
the grade of major, be set aside.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 98-03569 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be considered for promotion to the grade of major by a Special Selection Board (SSB) for the CY96A (4 Mar 96) Major Selection Board (P0496A), with inclusion of the corrected Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) provided; the citations...
c. The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) reviewed by the CY97C board reflect an overall recommendation of “Definitely Promote (DP).” 3. He was promoted by SSB to major with annotations on his top two OPRs, and subsequently promoted APZ to LTC with the AF Form 77 and four OPRs with annotations in his records. He contends, in part, that his unnecessary break in service and the annotated documents in his records caused the MLR board not to award him a “DP” on the CY97C PRF and the promotion...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-1999-00530A
In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was insufficient evidence to warrant any corrective action regarding the applicant’s requests that his OPR rendered for the period 9 Jul 93 through 22 Aug 94 be declared void and removed from his records; his OPR rendered for the period 23 Aug 94 through 15 Jul 95 be declared void and removed from his records; his PRF prepared for consideration by the CY96A board be declared void and removed from his records; his PRF prepared for...
Therefore, we recommend that her record, to include the “Definitely Promote” recommendation on the CY97C PRF, be considered for promotion to the grade of major by special selection board (SSB) for the CY97C Central Major Selection Board. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Promotion Recommendation, AF Form 709,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00189
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00189 (CASE 2) INDEX CODE: 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1994A (CY94A) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. On 1 Nov 01, the Board...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1990-01087-3
c. The OPR, closing out 28 November 1989, be amended to reflect a closing date of 18 October 1990. d. The Officer Performance Report (OPR), closing 20 June 1994, be amended by changing the statement, “Returned to MG with trepidation, but has met the challenge and is leading Medical Logistics to a new level,” to “Assumed duties, has met the challenge and is leading Medical Logistics to a new level.” e. His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) be corrected to reflect the duty title, “Commander,...
However, he has been advised that although he was selected for promotion to the grade of technical sergeant (E-6) in 1994, since his records were corrected to show that he was reinstated as a commissioned officer, he will have to reenlist as a staff sergeant (E-5). If he is not promoted to the grade of major, he requests promotion to the grade of technical sergeant with DOR of 1 August 1994, since this is the DOR he would have received had he not been returned to commissioned status. A...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02673
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-02673 INDEX CODES: 111.01, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 2006C (CY06C) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (CSB) be declared void and removed from her records, and the attached PRF be...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 00-02209 INDEX CODES: 111.02, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for consideration by the Calendar Year 1997E (CY97E) Lieutenant Colonel Board (PO597E), which convened on 8 Dec 97, be voided and replaced with a reaccomplished PRF. There was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00500
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPE notes the rater is simply letting the applicant know that her assessment was what she intended it to be at the time and she has no valid reason to change her assessment four years later. Exhibit F. Letter, Counsel, dated 7 May 04. JOE G. LINEBERGER Director Air Force Review Boards Agency AFBCMR BC-2004-00500 MEMORANDUM FOR THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF...