Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00495
Original file (BC-2004-00495.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00495
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  Not Indicated

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His  service-connected  medical  conditions,  degenerative   arthritis   and
shoulder prosthesis, be assessed as combat related in order to  qualify  for
compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His disability was incurred in  combat  while  assigned  to  the  1st  Rifle
Platoon, "A" Company, 164th Infantry Regiment.  His disabilities qualify  as
hazardous service/instrumentality of war.  If he had  not  served  he  would
have not had to have his shoulder replaced.

In support of his request applicant provided a copy of his  Enlisted  Record
and  Report  of  Separation  and  his  CRSC  denial  letter.   His  complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant served in the United States Army from 27 May  43  through  29  Nov
45.  He contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 3  May
49.  He was progressively promoted to the grade of senior  master  sergeant,
having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1  Apr  67.
He voluntarily retired from the Air Force  on  31  Aug  74.   He  served  27
years, 10 months, and 1 day on active duty.

Current Department of Veterans Affairs  (DVA)  records  reflect  a  combined
compensable disability rating of 80% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved based upon the fact that his  re  cords
failed to show a traumatic event or occurrence, which corroborates a combat-
related incident as defined by Public Law 107-314.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD states his records reflect  little  doubt
his  service-connected  disabilities  occurred  while  performing  his   job
related responsibilities  pertinent  to  his  Air  Force  Specialty  in  the
Medical Career Field.  On 18 May 62, he complained  of  shoulder  pain  when
sleeping in the field with no further clarification on what actually  caused
the pain.  On 4 Mar 63, he injured  his  right  shoulder  by  falling.   His
medical conditions are the result of his particular physical makeup,  not  a
combat related event.

The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant states his degenerative arthritis started during  the  years  1943
through 1945, not because he was assigned  to  the  Infantry  Regiment,  but
because he was in a rifle company and  in  direct  combat  with  the  enemy.
During his military career he never fell down and hurt his  right  shoulder,
nor did her ever make that statement.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
00495 in Executive Session on 23 Feb 05, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 Jan 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 7 Jun 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jun 04.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 22 Jun 04.
    Exhibit F.  Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 14 Dec 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02282

    Original file (BC-2004-02282.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02282 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 25 Jan 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, degenerative arthritis and condition of the skeletal system, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02830

    Original file (BC-2003-02830.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02830 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All of his service-connected medical conditions be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. There are no service medical record entries for injuries...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01237

    Original file (BC-2004-01237.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01237 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, degenerative arthritis (cervical) and degenerative arthritis (left and right shoulder), be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02060

    Original file (BC-2004-02060.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His injuries were incurred when he fell off a ladder entering a B-29 aircraft. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his degenerative arthritis and limited motion of arm are not combat related. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02061

    Original file (BC-2004-02061.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 22 Mar 04 based upon the fact that evidence provided did not show his service-connected medical conditions were combat-related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 30 Jul 04 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04056

    Original file (BC-2003-04056.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A 30 Mar 67, Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) hearing found that he was fit for duty at that time. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical conditions the applicant believes are combat-related were not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in the performance of duty under conditions simulating war, or through an instrumentality of war, and therefore, do not qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01088

    Original file (BC-2006-01088.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Available Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) records reflect a combined compensable rating of 20% for his unfitting conditions. DPPD states the applicant initially requested review of his service-connected disabilities of back strain, degenerative arthritis of the hands and knees, and bursitis of the shoulder. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-03802

    Original file (BC-2007-03802.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal letter and documentation associated with her CRSC application. Available DVA records reflect a combined compensable rating of 90% for her service-connected conditions. The complete DPPD evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 8 February 2008 for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04034

    Original file (BC-2003-04034.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Medical Consultant states duties as an aircraft mechanic are not classified as hazardous duty under the criteria for CRSC. We agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03565

    Original file (BC-2004-03565.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-03565 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 22 May 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, degenerative arthritis and knee condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...