Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00046
Original file (BC-2004-00046.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00046
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  DVA
XXXXXXX
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO
XXXXXXX

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  10 Jul 05

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His medical conditions, Arteriosclerotic Heart Disease,  Vascular  Dementia,
and Thrombosis of the Brain, be assessed  as  combat  related  in  order  to
qualify for  compensation  under  the  Combat-Related  Special  Compensation
(CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His vascular conditions are due to the stress of flight duties.

His complete submission is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant is a former Army Air Corps member who entered  active  duty  on  7
February 1943.  He was progressively promoted  to  the  grade  of  technical
sergeant.  He served as a B-29  remote-turret  gunner  and  flight  engineer
during World War II and  the  Korean  War.   He  also  performed  duties  in
support of United Nations  operations  in  the  Congo.   He  was  disability
retired due to  his  residuals  of  cerebrovascular  disease  including  his
cognitive deficits, having served 20 years, 10 months, and 5 days on  active
duty.

Current Department of Veterans Affairs  (DVA)  records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 100% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 18 December  2003,  based  upon  the
fact that his service-connected medical conditions were  determined  not  to
be combat-related.   However,  on  25  April  2005,  his  hearing  loss  was
approved for 50% and his ear infections were approved for 10%.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion  that  while  the  applicant’s
hearing loss qualifies for CRSC, his other  conditions  do  not.   The  BCMR
Medical Consultant  states,  in  part,  that  applicant’s  hearing  loss  is
related to hazardous noise exposure during the thousands of hours of  aerial
flight and duties as an aerial gunner; however, his external ear  infections
are related to hearing aid wear and not combat-related duties.

The BCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  14
December 2004 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
BCMR Medical Consultant and  adopt  his  rationale  as  the  basis  for  our
conclusion that the applicant has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
01402 in Executive Session on 6 April and 3 May 2005, under  the  provisions
of AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
                 Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Dec 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 10 Dec 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 14 Dec 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02830

    Original file (BC-2003-02830.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02830 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: All of his service-connected medical conditions be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. There are no service medical record entries for injuries...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-04306

    Original file (BC-2003-04306.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    A review of his medical records reveals no record of such injuries, although while stationed at Kadena AB, he injured his back lifting furniture. The Medical Consultant states he asserts his back was injured during a rocket attack in Vietnam either by falling off a helicopter or when a comrade fell on his back seeking shelter. He also asserts his back and knee conditions were caused by his duties during aerial flight.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02790

    Original file (BC-2003-02790.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02790 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, degenerative arthritis of both hips, hearing loss, and tinnitus, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03893

    Original file (BC-2003-03893.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03893 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, bilateral patellofemoral syndrome and tinnitus, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. In support of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03782

    Original file (BC-2003-03782.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03782 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, paralysis of left ulnar nerve, limited flexion of knee, and left shoulder bursitis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03763

    Original file (BC-2003-03763.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He voluntarily retired from the Air Force on 1 Jul 77, in the grade of lieutenant colonel. Over ten years after retiring from the Air Force he was shown to have leg swelling due to chronic venous insufficiency. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01263

    Original file (BC-2004-01263.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His problems probably started with his combat flying in WWII and Korea but his disability became manifested during combat flying in Vietnam in fighter and helicopter missions. The Medical Consultant states his service records show he was diagnosed with osteoarthritis of the cervical spine at age 50. Exhibit E. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 31 Mar 05.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02861

    Original file (BC-2003-02861.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Aerial flight is listed as hazardous service, this, his injury which occurred while performing required aircrew duties while onboard an aircraft, qualifies under the "engagement in hazardous service" for CRSC determination. The Medical Consultant states practice aircraft ground egress is not considered aerial flight and does not qualify as hazardous duty for purposes of CRSC eligibility. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00768

    Original file (BC-2004-00768.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the absence of a specific traumatic event resulting in significant, documented spine injury, it is impossible to attribute direct causation of degenerative spine disease to aerial flight. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00056

    Original file (BC-2004-00056.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00056 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...