Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03959
Original file (BC-2003-03959.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-03959
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  Not Indicated

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected medical condition, seborrheic dermatitis, be  assessed
as combat related in order to qualify  for  compensation  under  the  Combat
Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Dermatitis and eczema are all over his body.  He believes his condition  was
caused by exposure to Agent  Orange  while  serving  his  tour  of  duty  in
Vietnam.  While he was working on Aircraft  47  Gunships,  he  had  to  walk
through the area where the  aircraft  that  were  used  for  spraying  Agent
Orange were being washed.  He had to wade through the  solution  to  get  to
work.  At the time, the dangers of Agent Orange were unknown.

In support of his request,  applicant  provided  a  personal  statement  and
documentation  associated  with  his   CRSC   application.    His   complete
submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant served in the National Guard from 1 Mar 48 through 24 Feb 50.   He
contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 1 Nov 50.   He
was progressively promoted  to  the  grade  of  technical  sergeant,  having
assumed that grade effective and with a date  of  rank  of  1  Aug  69.   He
served as a Weapons Maintenance Technician.   He  voluntarily  retired  from
the Air Force 31 May 72.  He served 21  Years,  8  months,  and  2  days  on
active duty.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 4 Nov 03 based upon  the  fact  that
his service-connected medical condition was determined  not  to  be  combat-
related.  However, on 24 Feb 04, his impaired hearing was approved for  CRSC
compensation rated at 20%.  His Dermatitis  of  eczema  remained  non-combat
related.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD recommends denial.  DPPD  states  his  dermatitis/eczema  was  not
considered to be presumptive of  Agent  Orange  and  does  not  substantiate
eligibility for CRSC.  The Department of  Veterans  Affair's  assessment  of
his skin condition was  considered  to  be  non-combat  related.   The  DPPD
evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27  Feb
04 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, this office  has
received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The BCMR Medical  Consultant  recommends  denial.   The  Medical  Consultant
states chronic seborrheic dermatitis is not a skin  disease  that  has  been
identified by the Institute  of  Medicine  as  having  an  association  with
exposure to Agent Orange.  There is no  evidence  in  his  record  that  his
service connected seborrheic dermatitis was incurred as a direct  result  of
armed conflict, while engaged in  performance  of  duties  under  conditions
simulating war,  as  a  result  of  an  instrumentality  of  war,  or  other
qualifying conditions.  The Medical Consultant Evaluation is at Exhibit E.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

Applicant he was diagnosed with sebhorrhaic dermatitis after  he  came  back
from Vietnam  in  1966.   He  disagrees  with  the  Medical  Consultant  and
believes his condition is definitely Agent  Orange  related.   His  complete
response is at Exhibit G.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred  as  the
direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service, in  the
performance  of  duty  under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through   an
instrumentality of war, and therefore, does  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinions and recommendations  of  the
Air Force offices of primary responsibility and  adopt  their  rationale  as
the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of
an error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we  find
no compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2003-
03959 in Executive Session on 23 Feb 05, under the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
      Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Nov 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 18 Feb 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Feb 04.
    Exhibit E.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 4 Nov 04.
    Exhibit F.  Letter, SAF/MRBC, dated 10 Nov 04.
    Exhibit G.  Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Jan 05.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00195

    Original file (BC-2005-00195.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00195 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 18 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, migraine headaches, impaired hearing, and dermatitis, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-01986

    Original file (BC-2004-01986.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 19 Apr 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. DPPD states a review of his service and DVA medical records show his skin condition is not combat related. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 28 Jan 05...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00072

    Original file (BC-2007-00072.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD provides a review of the applicant’s medical records and states in order for these disabilities to be considered combat related, they must be specifically granted by the Veterans Administration (VA) as presumptive to AO exposure. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 27 Apr 07 for review and comment within 30...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03696

    Original file (BC-2004-03696.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    His CRSC application was disapproved on 21 Oct 04 based upon the fact that his service-connected medical conditions were determined not to be combat- related. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPD recommends denial. The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060009553

    Original file (20060009553.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. (a disease of bone marrow that is characterized by the presence of numerous myelomas in various bones of the body). Without evidence to establish a direct, causal relationship to the applicant’s VA rated disabilities to war or the simulation of war, there is insufficient basis in which to grant his request.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03029

    Original file (BC-2005-03029.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    DPPD provided a review of his relevant medical history and states he was treated several times prior to his Vietnam service for the skin condition. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission...

  • ARMY | BCMR | CY2005 | 20050003543C070206

    Original file (20050003543C070206.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Richard T. Dunbar | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Due to cost constraints, while all military retirees will eventually receive concurrent receipt of VA disability compensation, only those military retirees who have disabilities incurred in combat, or in conditions simulating combat (which includes hazardous duties), are eligible for CRSC. In view of the preceding conclusions, there is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00805

    Original file (BC-2004-00805.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states that his records show he was treated for both myalgic myopathy of unknown origin and peripheral neuropathy. In 1994, he received a brief from the DVA stating that his peripheral neuropathy was added to the list of conditions related to Agent Orange. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01278

    Original file (BC-2004-01278.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement outlining his career as an Air Force officer and providing data pertaining to the studies of the effects of herbicides and Plutonium exposure; a bibliography, a physician's statement, and his CRSC denial letter. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat-related was not incurred as the direct result of armed...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00920

    Original file (BC-2004-00920.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00920 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, prostate gland condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. In support of his request, applicant...