RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02988
INDEX NUMBER: 100.00
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His discharge be upgraded to allow him to enlist into the Reserves.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
At the time of his service, he was unfortunately married to a woman that
liked to write bad checks.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 19
June 1986. On 30 March 1987, he received notification that he was being
recommended for discharge for misconduct - minor disciplinary infractions.
The commander’s reasons for the action were applicant’s receipt of six
letters of reprimand for failing to go at the time prescribed to his place
of duty on three separation occasions; uttering 13 different worthless
checks to the base exchange, totaling $1,258.36; operating a motor vehicle
without having a driver’s license in his possession; and operating a motor
vehicle without having safe tires on the vehicle; and an Article 15 for
failing to go at the time prescribed to his appointed place of duty. The
discharge authority approved the discharge and he received a general
discharge on 22 April 1987, under the provisions of AFR 39-10 (Misconduct),
and was issued RE code 2B (Involuntarily separated with a general or under-
other-than-honorable-conditions (UOTHC) discharge). He had completed a
total of 10 months and 4 days of active service and was serving in the
grade of airman (E-2) at the time of discharge.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
applicant’s discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive
requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of
the discharge authority. Applicant has not submitted any evidence of any
errors or injustices that occurred in the processing of his discharge, nor
provided facts warranting a change to his character of service.
The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 8 October 2004 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence
of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no
evidence of error or injustice. In this respect, we note the applicant’s
discharge appears to be in compliance with the governing Air Force
Regulation in effect at the time of his separation and he was afforded all
the rights to which entitled. The applicant has provided no evidence to
indicate his separation was inappropriate. There being insufficient
evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to recommend granting
the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-02988
in Executive Session on 17 November 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Kathy L. Boockholdt, Panel Chair
Mr. Wallace F. Beard, Jr., Member
Mr. Albert C. Ellett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Sep 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 7 Oct 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 04.
KATHY L. BOOCKHOLDT
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02395
On 30 October 1975, the Numbered AF commander approved the discharge, without P&R. On 6 December 1978, the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied applicant’s request to have his discharge upgraded. At that time, the applicant was also invited to provide additional evidence pertaining to his activities since leaving the service (Exhibit F).
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01547
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01547 INDEX NUMBER: 121.03 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 19.5 days of leave be restored to his leave balance. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPF recommends 17.5 days of leave be restored to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02598
On 7 Sep 01, the applicant submitted a response to the discharge authority requesting he be retained or discharged with an honorable discharge. Based on their review of the documentation in the master personnel record, they determined the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. Contrary to this assertion, one serious military or civilian offense may be a basis for discharge for misconduct.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00149
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A complete copy...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02375
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02375 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his discharge from the Air Force be changed from “Misconduct” to “Convenience of the Government.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03758
(3) On 5 June 1989, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand for reporting for duty over two hours late. Having found no error or injustice with regard to the actions that occurred while the applicant was a military member, we conclude that no basis exists to grant favorable action on her request. Exhibit E. FBI Report, dated 24 Jan 06.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03577
The discharge section at the personnel office said he could request an upgrade to honorable after one year of being separated. On 4 February 1988, applicant was discharged under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Administrative Separation of Airmen, (alcohol abuse rehabilitation failure), with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting an upgrade in his discharge.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01381
On 22 Dec 72, the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged without P&R, and that he be issued a DD Form 257AF, General Discharge Certificate. Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 18 May 04. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 May 04.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02587
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02587 INDEX NUMBER: 135.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by Special Selection Board (SSB) beginning with the Calendar Year 2002B (CY02B) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board. Additionally,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02474
In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a copy of his DD Form 214, dated 25 Jan 74. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ ARPC/DPRFQ, dated 6 Oct 04. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Oct 04.