RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02903
INDEX CODE: 131.00, 107.00
COUNSEL: Mr. Barry P. Steinberg
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Officer Selection Records (OSR) prepared for the 21 Sep 04 Special
Board be corrected to include the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM)
second oak leaf cluster (2OLC) awarded for the period 26 Nov 89 through 13
Dec 91.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The orders reflecting the award of the AFCM (2OLC0 were issued on 1 Sep 92,
almost 9 months after the end of the period for which the award was made.
As a consequence of the delay the award will not be available for
consideration by the Special Board because the award did not exist when the
original Reduction in force (RIF) board convened. Since the Special Board
will consider officers without any quota no officer will be placed at a
competitive disadvantage by this correction. The correction will enable
the Special Board to be better informed of his achievements. The
inordinate delay in the issuance of the award is through no fault of his
own. Equity requires that any officer being considered for involuntary
elimination be evaluated with a full and complete record. Denying a board
records, assessments, awards and reports because of delays not attributable
to the conduct of the officer is fundamentally unfair.
In support of his request, applicant provided his counsel's brief,
documentation pertaining to award of the AFCM, and his OSR contents. His
complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant Reserve of the Air Force on 17
Dec 85. He was progressively promoted to the grade of captain, having
assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank of 17 Dec 89. He was
considered and not selected for retention in the Air Force by the FY93 RIF
board, which convened on 20 Jul 92. He was separated from active duty on
31 Dec 92. He is currently serving in the Air Force Reserves on extended
active duty in the grade of major. Pursuant to the court ordered
settlement in the Berkley v. United States case he is being reconsidered
for retention by the Calendar Year 2004 Special Board on 21 Sep 04.
On 1 Sep 92, applicant was awarded the AFCM (2OLC) for the period 26 Nov 89
through 13 Dec 91.
Applicant's complete OPR profile prior to the RIF board reflected overall
assessments of "Meets Standards."
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial. DPPPO states, although the period of the
AFCM was prior to the convening of the RIF board, it was not approved until
after the board convened. Inclusion of decorations that did not exist at
the time of the board significantly departs from Air Force policy. DPPPO
can find no provisions in policy that authorize changing the date a
decoration was approved.
The DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Counsel states the award of the AFCM was delayed but the period of
performance ended prior to the original board. The delays should not be a
basis to deny full and fair consideration.
His complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Applicant contends that as a result of
delays in processing of his AFCM (2OLC), he was considered by the RIF board
without a full and complete record of his performance. On the other hand,
the Air Force recommends denial noting that, although the period of the
AFCM was prior to the convening of the RIF board, it was not approved until
after the board convened; and that inclusion of decorations that did not
exist at the time of the board significantly departs from Air Force Policy.
We do not take issue with Air Force policy. However, given the fact that
the applicant was competing for an opportunity to be retained on active
duty and in consideration of the somewhat excessive processing time for
approval of the award, we believe it should have been a matter of record
for the original RIF board. Therefore, we recommend his records be
corrected as indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the Air Force Commendation Medal,
(2OLC) for the period 26 November 1989 through 13 December 1991, was
approved on 1 July 1992, rather than 1 September 1992, and was accepted
for file in his Officer Selection Record on 5 July 1992.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-02903
in Executive Session on 20 Sep 04, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
Mr. Christopher D. Carey, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The following
documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Sep 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPO, dated 13 Sep 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 16 Sep 04.
Exhibit E. Letter, Counsel, dated 15 Sep 04.
CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-02903
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the Air Force
Commendation Medal, (2OLC) for the period 26 November 1989 through 13
December 1991, was approved on 1 July 1992, rather than 1 September 1992,
and was accepted for file in his Officer Selection Record on 5 July 1992.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02899
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02899 INDEX CODE: 131.00, 107.00 COUNSEL: Mr. Barry P. Steinberg HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Selection Records (OSR) prepared for the 21 Sep 04 Special Board be corrected to include the Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM) first oak leaf cluster (1OLC) awarded for the period 16 May 92...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02881
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02881 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: BARRY P. STEINBERG XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM) awarded for the period 9 August 1990 to 29 November 1990; the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) awarded for the period 23 November 1986 to 3 March 1992; and a Retention Selection...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02879
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02879 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: BARRY P. STEINBERG XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM) awarded for the period 7 November 1991 to 8 January 1992 be placed in his Officer Selection Record (OSR) for the 21 September 2004 Special Board convened pursuant to the court...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02902
He was considered and not selected for retention in the Air Force by the FY93 RIF board, which convened on 20 Jul 92. He has not provided any supporting documentation to show the intent of the evaluators to have the report on file prior to the convening of the RIF board. The DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states the OPR was delayed through no fault of the applicant's.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02900
His Officer Selection Records (OSR) prepared for the 21 Sep 04 Special Board be corrected to include the above corrected OPR. The DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states that a review of prior actions of the Board pertaining to the applicant will demonstrate this correction was previously made but not reflected in the records. The applicant also contends that the Letters...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02877
Applicant was considered and not selected for retention in the Air Force by the FY93 RIF board which convened on 20 July 1992. The AFPC/DPPPO evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Counsel states the consequences for failing to make the requested correction could not be more compelling, especially when considering a former member of the FY93 RIF board recommends favorable consideration in view...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02876
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02876 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: BARRY P. STEINBERG XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The 16 March 1991 Letter or Evaluation (LOE) be placed in her Officer Selection Record (OSR) for the 21 September 2004 Special Board convened pursuant to the court approved settlement in Berkley v. Unites States. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01743
Applicant was considered and not selected for retention in the Air Force by the FY93 RIF board which convened on 20 July 1992. Counsel complete response is at Exhibit F. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial of applicant’s request to include the OPR, closing 21 June 1992, in her OSR for the Special Board. Although the remedy recommended by the appropriate offices of the Air Force is to remove...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01485
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPO recommends the Board approve the applicant’s request to award him the AFCM for the period 29 November 1989 to 4 September 1992 based on their review of his application and supporting documentation. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant’s counsel responded that by recommending the Air Force Commendation Medal...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02880
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02880 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: BARRY P. STEINBERG XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 17 July 1991 through 16 July 1992, be included in his Officer Selection Record (OSR) for the 21 September 2004 Special Board convened pursuant to the court...