Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02729
Original file (BC-2004-02729.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02729
            INDEX CODE:  107.00
            COUNSEL:  NONE
  
            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Air Medal and his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect  the
rank of sergeant.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He flew three missions.  He received the rank of  sergeant  and  would  like
his DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect this rank.

In support of his appeal, he provides a copy of his  Report  of  Separation,
individual flight record, a newspaper article and  a  copy  of  field  order
696.

His submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_______________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The  applicant’s  records  were   lost   or   destroyed   and   efforts   at
reconstruction have been, for the most part,  unsuccessful.   The  following
is the only known information pertaining to the applicant's service and  was
extracted from the document provided by the applicant.

The applicant enlisted in the Regular  Air  Force  on  15  April  1943.   He
performed duty  as  an  airplane  armorer  gunner.   Applicant’s  Separation
Qualification Record reflects the applicant held the grade of  sergeant  for
approximately 14 months.  On 1 March 1946, he was  honorably  discharged  in
the grade of private,  for  the  Convenience  of  the  Government.   He  was
credited with 2 years, 7 months and 7 days  of  continental  service  and  3
months and 10 days of foreign service.   His  discharge  document  shows  he
participated in the Air Offensive  Europe  campaign.   He  was  awarded  the
European-African-Middle  Eastern  Theater  ribbon  with  one  bronze   star,
Victory ribbon, American Theatre ribbon and the Good Conduct Medal.  He  had
3 days’ lost time.

________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied.  DPPPR states there  is  no
evidence in the applicant’s military personnel records which support he  was
awarded the Air Medal (AM).  The applicant’s  personal  statement  alone  is
insufficient to award him the Air Medal.  As requested by DPPPR, he did  not
submit the additional documentation to substantiate his entitlement  to  the
AM.  The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit B.

AFPC/DPPPWB recommends the application be denied.  DPPPWB  states  that  due
to the extremely  limited  records,  and  unreasonable  delay,  has  greatly
complicated the ability to determine the merits  of  his  request.   In  the
absence of documentation, DPPPWB assumes he was  discharged  in  the  proper
grade of private.

AFPC/DPPRS was unable to determine the propriety of the discharge  based  on
the lack of documentation in his record (see Exhibit C).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 15 October 2004, copies of the Air Force evaluations  were  sent  to  the
applicant for review and comment.  As of this  date,  this  office  has  not
received a response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest  of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of  the  applicant’s
contention that he should be  awarded  the  Air  Medal.   After  a  thorough
review of his submission and the available evidence of record,  we  are  not
persuaded that he should be awarded the  Air  Medal.   In  addition  to  the
applicant’s  personal  statement,  he  was  asked  to   provide   additional
documentation to include  recommendations  for  the  AM  from  someone  with
firsthand knowledge of the  act.   He  did  not  provide  this  information.
Therefore, in the absence of such evidence, we agree with  the  opinion  and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility  and  adopt
its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that  the  applicant  has  not
provided the necessary documentation to substantiate his claim.

4.  With respect to  the  applicant’s  request  that  his  DD  Form  214  be
corrected to reflect the rank of sergeant, we took note  of  his  separation
qualification record which reflects the applicant did  attain  the  rank  of
sergeant during his enlistment.  However, we  also  note  that  on  1  March
1946, his separation document reflects his grade as private  with  a  remark
that three days were lost under the Articles of War (AW) 107.  We note  that
the AW states, among other things, that AW 107 was used to cover  desertion,
AWOL,  military  confinement,  civil  confinement,  drunkenness,   fighting,
sports and self-injury.  In view of this and in the  absence  of  a  showing
that his loss time was  in  error,  we  have  no  basis  to  find  that  the
applicant’s rank of private  received  at  the  time  of  his  discharge  is
erroneous or unjust.  Accordingly, the applicant’s request is not  favorably
considered.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application in  Executive
Session on 14 December 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

          Mr. Robert S. Boyd, Panel Chair
          Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member
          Ms. Janet I. Hassan, Member

The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR  Docket  Number  04-02729  was
considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 Jan 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Letters, AFPC/DPPPR, AFPC/DPPPWB, dated
                30 Sep 04.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 13 Oct 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Oct 04.





                                   ROBERT S. BOYD
                                   Panel Chair


Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02269

    Original file (BC-2003-02269.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her appeal, the applicant has provided a personal statement, a Certificate of Death from the state of ---, a copy of a court document naming the deceased’s wife as executor of his estate, copies of orders awarding the Air Medal and an oak leaf cluster to the Air Medal to the deceased member, an obituary, a congressional request for information from C/M Jo Bonner of Alabama, a copy of the deceased members Enlisted Record and Report of Separation, a copy of his Army Qualification...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03746

    Original file (BC-2003-03746.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 3 September 2003, during a records review, Headquarters Air Force Personnel Center identified an error in Item 26, Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendation, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized, and issued the applicant a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, reflecting the award of the Air Force Longevity Service Award. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02759

    Original file (BC-2006-02759.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In addition, the applicant did not serve in Vietnam, therefore is not eligible for the RVNCM. The complete AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant states the Air Force failed in its responsibility to inform separating personnel that the Board for Corrections of Military Records (BCMR) was an option. After a thorough review of the available evidence and the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03161

    Original file (BC-2003-03161.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03161 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The closeout date of his Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) for the period 3 May 1999 to 15 January 2003 be changed to 15 October 2002, and included in his record for promotion cycle 03E6. A complete copy of the evaluation is...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | 0202032

    Original file (0202032.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    Current Air Force promotion policy dictates that before a decoration is credited for a specific promotion cycle, the close out date of the decoration must be on or before the Promotion Eligibility Cutoff Date (PECD), and the date of the DÉCOR-6, Request for Decoration Printout (RDP), must be before the date of selection for the cycle in question. AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00245

    Original file (BC-2006-00245.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2006-00245 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 28 July 2007 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his promotion to the grade of staff sergeant (SSgt)...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00948

    Original file (BC-2004-00948.DOC) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00948 INDEX CODE: 107.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect the award of the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA). The DPPPR evaluation, dated 8 September 2004, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02397

    Original file (BC-2004-02397.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02397 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect he received a promotion to technical sergeant (TSgt) while he was a Prisoner of War (POW). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPWB...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04106

    Original file (BC-2003-04106.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The application was returned on 8 January 2002, without action and, again, the applicant was informed that he needed to obtain a signed and endorsed recommendation package and submit it through congressional channels. The Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council Board denied award of the DFC, but awarded the applicant the AM 1/OLC for meritorious achievement on 15 August 1970. In his third request (submitted into congressional channels), the applicant obtained a signed and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01667

    Original file (BC-2005-01667.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    They also find no promotion order indicating he was ever selected for promotion prior to retirement AFPC/DPPPWB’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 5 August 2005 for review and response. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...