RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02489
INDEX CODE: 131.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
She be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by
the earliest SSB in-lieu-of the FY05 Line and NonLine Lt Colonel
Position Vacancy Selection Board.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was nominated for promotion by her commander and an appropriately
written PRF was forwarded to ARPC for consideration at the FY05 board
without knowledge of the error in authorized grade. She was
incorrectly assigned to a position number with an authorized grade of
0-4. Her commander supports this nomination and the error is being
corrected in order to allow her to be considered for promotion at the
earliest SSB.
In support of the appeal, applicant submits a copy of the e-mail
communication and a copy of her PRF.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in the
grade of major.
The applicant’s nomination package, AF Form 709, Promotion
Recommendation (PRF), when received at ARPC on 30 April 2004, did not
contain a recommended position number. Once researched, the applicant
was found to occupy a major’s position according to MilPDS and the
Reserve Management Vacancy System (RMVS) - Manpower/Personnel Position
Information.
A position number and reassignment of the applicant to a higher graded
position was requested by e-mail communication from ARPC to 374
MSS/DPMR, Yokota AB, Japan. Assorted e-mail traffic within PACAF
indicates obtaining an authorized higher graded position number and
reassigning the applicant to a higher graded position was not
accomplished.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPB states as of 25 August 2004, MilPDS indicated the applicant
was assigned to a higher graded position. However, verification with
Reserve Management Vacancy System showed the position does not exist.
An officer cannot be assigned against a position that is not funded or
authorized. It is possible for an officer to be eligible to be
assigned to a higher graded position, but a position does not exist.
The applicant is not and was not, at the time of the selection board,
eligible for promotion consideration. Before the board, during the
board and now after public release of the board results, the applicant
does not occupy a valid higher graded position. There is no
eligibility for position vacancy promotion because no vacancy exists.
Therefore, they recommend denial of applicant’s request.
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 3 September 2004, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the
applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for the conclusion that the
applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 2 December 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Marilyn M. Thomas, Panel Chair
Ms. B.J. White-Olson, Member
Mr. Gregory A. Parker, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 6 Aug 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPB, dated 30 Aug 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Sep 04.
MARILYN M. THOMAS
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2004-01559
DPB states the applicant was date of rank (DOR) eligible for consideration by the FY05 Major PV Selection Board. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be considered for promotion to the grade of major, Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board (SRB), and her records be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02883
In support of his response, applicant provided a personal statement; a letter from his wing commander, and letter of certification from the military personnel flight. The attached AF Form 709, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), prepared for the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion Selection Board, was accepted for file on 21 April 2004. c. It is further recommended that his record, to include the attached AF Form 709,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-03036
_________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that the attached Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), AF Form 709, prepared for the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion Selection Board, was accepted for file on 22 April 2004. It is further recommended that her record, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01688
The 624 RSG commander provides a supporting statement confirming she did submit the applicant for promotion but discovered, after the board results were released, that the package was never forwarded from 624 RSG/DPM to HQ ARPC. The applicant was date-of-rank (DOR) eligible for consideration by the FY05 Major PV selection board, but his name did not appear on the list of officers considered by this board. OLGA M. CRERAR Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-01688 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02641
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02641 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His position number (007130530) be changed to position number 00713050 and that be considered for a Position Vacancy (PV) promotion by a Special Review Board (SRB) for the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Reserve of the Air Force (ResAF)...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01082
DPB states, the applicant did not meet the requirement of occupying the nominated position on the PRF submission date, or before the board convened. In reference to #3(b), the letter states the PRF submission was 9 Dec 11. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we do not find the evidence presented sufficiently persuasive to recommend Special Board consideration.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03190
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPB recommends denial and states consideration for the Major PV Selection Board is based on the receipt of the AF Form 709. The applicant’s senior rater, the sole nomination authority for the PV Selection Board, has not submitted documentation to support either an original nomination, or express support for the appeal request. The original packet was completed and submitted to the MPF on time.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02656
___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that the attached AF Form 709, Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), prepared for the Fiscal Year 2005 (FY05) Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel Position Vacancy (PV) Promotion Selection Board, was accepted for file on 21 April 2004. It is further recommended that his record, to...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02947
It is further recommended that his record, to include the attached Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF), AF Form 709, signed by Colonel Close, be considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel, Air Force Reserve, by a Special Review Board (SRB), and his records be evaluated in comparison with the records of officers who were and were not selected by the FY05 Line and Health Professions Lieutenant Colonel PV Promotion Selection Board, and if recommended for promotion by the SRB,...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02654
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 17 Sep 04 for review and response. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). ROBERT S. BOYD Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2004-02654 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the...