Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01605
Original file (BC-2004-01605.doc) Auto-classification: Approved


                             RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-01605
            INDEX CODE:       100.03, 100.06
            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  YES

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her reenlistment  eligibility  (RE)  code  be  changed  to  allow  re-
enlistment.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her service was wrongly identified and because of this  injustice  her
discharge was upgraded to honorable.  Her service to the Air Force was
honorable and therefore should reflect in her RE code.

In support of her request, applicant provided  a  personal  statement,
Air Force Discharge Review Board Decision Documentation, and  DD  Form
214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty.

Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 9 October 1997, for
a term of 4 years.   On  11  April  2001,  she  was  notified  of  her
commander’s intent to recommend that she be discharged  from  the  Air
Force under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,  Administrative  Separation
of Airmen, (Minor disciplinary Infractions) with a general  discharge.
The reason for this action was that on 3 April 2001, she  received  an
Article 15 for failure to go at the time prescribed to  her  appointed
place of duty; an Article 15 on 2 March 2001, for failure to pay  just
debts and with the intent to deceive,  making  a  false  statement;  a
Letter of Reprimand (LOR) on 29 March 2001, for failure to go;  a  LOR
on 14 March 2001, for failure to pay just debt; and a LOR  on  15  May
2000, for reckless driving.  She was advised of  her  rights  in  this
matter and acknowledged receipt of the notification on 11 April  2001.
She consulted with counsel  and  submitted  a  statement  in  her  own
behalf.  In a legal review of the case file,  the  base  legal  office
found the case legally sufficient to support discharge.  The discharge
authority approved the separation  and  ordered  a  general  discharge
without probation and rehabilitation.  She was separated from the  Air
Force on 13 April 2001, with a general discharge and  received  an  RE
code of 2B “Separated with a general or  under  other  than  honorable
conditions discharge”.  She served 3 years, 6 months and  13  days  on
active duty.

On 26 October 2001, the applicant submitted an application to the  Air
Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) requesting her general discharge be
upgraded to honorable, a change of reason for separation and a  change
of RE code.  On 24  February  2003,  the  applicant  and  her  counsel
appeared before the DRB.  The DRB concluded that the positive  aspects
of the applicant’s duty performance outweighed the negative  and  that
the characterization of the member’s service justified an  upgrade  to
honorable.  The DRB upgraded her discharge to honorable,  changed  her
reason for discharge to secretarial authority, but denied her  request
for a change of RE code.  (Exhibit B)

The applicant was initially  issued  RE  code  2B  “Separated  with  a
general or under the other than honorable conditions discharge.  Since
the DRB changed her discharge to honorable, she was issued an RE  code
of 2C “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge;  or  entry
level separation without characterization of service” to coincide with
her honorable discharge.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice.  Based on the actions taken by the
Discharge Review Board to change her characterization  of  service  to
honorable, her post service accomplishments and her desire to serve in
the Air Force, the Board believes that her RE code of "2C"  should  be
changed to "3K", which is a waiverable code  and  will  allow  her  to
apply for enlistment.  Whether or not she is successful will depend on
the needs of the service and our recommendation in no  way  guarantees
that she  will  be  allowed  to  return  to  any  branch  of  service.
Accordingly, we recommend that her records be corrected to the  extent
indicated below.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not  been
shown  that  a  personal  appearance  with  or  without  counsel  will
materially  add  to  our  understanding  of  the  issue(s)   involved.
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the  Department  of  the  Air  Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the  time  of  her
discharge on 13 April 2001, she was issued an Reenlistment Eligibility
(RE) code of "3K".

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2004-
01605 in Executive Session on 15 July 2004, under  the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                 Mr. David W. Mulgrew, Panel Chair
                 Mr. James E. Short, Member
                 Mr. Gary G. Sauner, Member

All  members  voted  to  correct  the  record,  as  recommended.   The
following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 10 May 04 w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 May 04.




      DAVID W. MULGREW
      Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2004-01605




MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF

      Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:

      The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of her
discharge on 13 April 2001, she was issued an Reenlistment Eligibility (RE)
code of “3K”.






  JOE G. LINEBERGER

  Director

  Air Force Review Boards Agency




Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02007

    Original file (BC-2004-02007.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of her request, the applicant submits a personal statement, DD Form 214 certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and case documents from the Air Force Discharge Review Board. On 13 September 2003, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) requesting her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable, change of reason for separation and change of RE code. (Exhibit B) The applicant was initially...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03149

    Original file (BC-2002-03149.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states, in part, that RE code 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) is correct. The applicant states that her academic performance was caused by her inability to concentrate due to her mother’s cancer and that she now desires to join the Air National Guard (ANG). In view of the foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected by deleting the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03149

    Original file (BC-2002-03149.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states, in part, that RE code 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge, or entry level separation without characterization of service) is correct. The applicant states that her academic performance was caused by her inability to concentrate due to her mother’s cancer and that she now desires to join the Air National Guard (ANG). In view of the foregoing, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected by deleting the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02394

    Original file (BC-2002-02394.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02394 COUNSEL: FREDERICK C. STERN HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C be changed to allow his enlistment in the Air National Guard (ANG). _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record, as it exists, does...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02394

    Original file (BC-2002-02394.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02394 COUNSEL: FREDERICK C. STERN HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2C be changed to allow his enlistment in the Air National Guard (ANG). _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The record, as it exists, does...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01870

    Original file (BC-2004-01870.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    On 13 April 1986, the applicant submitted an application to the Air Force Discharge Review Board (DRB) requesting his general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The DRB upgraded his discharge to honorable, but on 21 May 1987, the Secretary of the Air Force, based on a recommendation from the Air Force Personnel Board denied his request for a change of RE code. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03152

    Original file (BC-2002-03152.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    The applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 10 June 1983, for exhibiting behavior that was considered disruptive and completely incompatible to conduct expected of a Noncommissioned Officer in Charge (NCOIC). _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds insufficient evidence of error or injustice and recommends the application be denied. DAVID W. MULGREW Panel Chair AFBCMR BC-2002-03152 MEMORANDUM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00933

    Original file (BC-2004-00933.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00933 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to a “1” category and his narrative reason for separation be changed to allow him to join the Air Force Reserves. On 29 April 1985, the applicant submitted an application to the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00893

    Original file (BC-2004-00893.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    In support of her request, the applicant provided a personal statement, copies of documents pertaining to her active duty and Air National Guard service, and other records pertaining to her college transcript. She was separated from the Air Force on 31 October 1995, with an uncharacterized entry-level separation, and received an RE code of 2C ”Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service.” She served 5 months and 15 days...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03152

    Original file (BC-2002-03152.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03152 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general discharge be upgraded to honorable. The applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), dated 10 June 1983, for exhibiting behavior that was considered disruptive and completely incompatible to conduct expected of a Noncommissioned...