Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00214
Original file (BC-2004-00214.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2004-00214
            INDEX CODE:  108.07
            COUNSEL:  NONE
XXXXXXX
            HEARING DESIRED:  YES
XXXXXXX

MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE:  26 Jul 05

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His service-connected disabilities, Loss  of  Part  of  Skull,  Spinal  Disc
Condition, and Caisson Disease of the Bones, be assessed as  combat  related
in order to  qualify  for  compensation  under  the  Combat-Related  Special
Compensation (CRSC) Act.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

While responding to an Operational Readiness Inspection (ORI) Alert, he  had
a brain aneurysm.  Since the disability was incurred in the  performance  of
duty under conditions simulating war, it should meet the criteria  for  CRSC
entitlement.

His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force  on  19
September 1957.  He was progressively promoted to  the  grade  of  technical
sergeant, having assumed that grade effective and with a date of rank  of  1
Jul 1969.  He served in Southeast Asia from 11 May 1969 to 8 May 1970  as  a
Mobile Flight Line Monitor.  He voluntarily retired from the Air Force on  1
October 1977, having served 20 years and 12 days on active duty.

Current Department of Veterans Affairs  (DVA)  records  reflect  a  combined
compensable rating of 60% for his unfitting conditions.

His CRSC application was disapproved on 12 December  2003,  because  he  did
not provide any documentation  to  support  that  his  conditions  were  the
direct result of performance of duty under conditions simulating war.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPD  recommends  denial  and  states,  in   part,   that   applicant’s
conditions do not meet the mandatory criteria  for  CRSC  entitlement.   The
fact   a   member   incurred   a   medical   condition   during   a   combat
operation/training exercise is not sufficient evidence to support a  combat-
related determination.  There is no record of any particular  incident  that
could account for the onset of the aneurysm.  In addition, applicant  states
the spinal disc condition and caisson  disease  of  bones  developed  during
treatment following the aneurysm.

The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded  to  the  applicant  on  21
June 2004 for review and comment within 30 days.   As  of  this  date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  After a thorough review of  the  available
evidence of record, it is our opinion  that  the  service-connected  medical
conditions the applicant believes are combat related were  not  incurred  as
the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous service,  in
the performance of duty under  conditions  simulating  war,  or  through  an
instrumentality of war, and  therefore,  do  not  qualify  for  compensation
under the CRSC Act.  We agree with the opinion  and  recommendation  of  the
Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the  victim  of  an
error or injustice.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been  shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will  materially  add  to
our understanding of the issues involved.   Therefore,  the  request  for  a
hearing is not favorably considered.

_________________________________________________________________


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number  BC-2004-
00214 in Executive Session on 6 April 2005, under the provisions of AFI  36-
2603:

                 Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Chair
                 Mr. Michael V. Barbino, Member
                 Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 Jan 04, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPPD, dated 17 Jun 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jun 04.




                                   THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
                                   Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00169

    Original file (BC-2005-00169.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00169 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 15 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, abdominal aortic aneurysm, hypertension, spinal disc condition, and bilateral knee conditions, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00297

    Original file (BC-2004-00297.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The AFPC/DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: His spinal disc condition is the direct result of military operations during World War II. After a thorough review of the available evidence of record, it is our opinion that the service-connected medical condition the applicant believes is combat related was not incurred as the direct result of armed conflict, while engaged in hazardous...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00229

    Original file (BC-2004-00229.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00229 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO XXXXXXX MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 26 Jul 05 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, spinal disc condition and back strain, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03824

    Original file (BC-2003-03824.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The DPPD evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states his injuries occurred during training operations and according to CRSC criteria he is eligible for compensation since the injuries were incurred during an ORI and while deployed to Egypt to participate in Operation Accurate Test. The Medical Consultant states the fact that a member incurred a disability during a period of war or...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03573

    Original file (BC-2003-03573.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03573 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, duodenal ulcer, spinal disc condition, residuals of right and left foot injury, limited motion in cervical spine, varicose veins of right...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00102

    Original file (BC-2004-00102.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00102 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical conditions, spinal disc condition and tinnitus, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2003-03631

    Original file (BC-2003-03631.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was treated for Spinal Disc Conditions and it was determined by Physical Evaluation Board that it was the result of his jumping dating back to 1953. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. We agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00826

    Original file (BC-2004-00826.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    While his spinal disc condition and hearing loss have been approved for CRSC, his other conditions are not combat related. The AFPC/DPPD evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 July 2004 for review and comment within 30 days. We agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00768

    Original file (BC-2004-00768.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In the absence of a specific traumatic event resulting in significant, documented spine injury, it is impossible to attribute direct causation of degenerative spine disease to aerial flight. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-00025

    Original file (BC-2005-00025.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00025 INDEX CODE: 108.07 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 Jul 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His service-connected medical condition, spinal disc condition, be assessed as combat related in order to qualify for compensation under the Combat Related Special Compensation (CRSC) Act. ...