RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00087
INDEX NUMBER: 100.06
XXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE
XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C” be upgraded.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His RE code should be upgraded because he only had one or two bad/negative
things happen in his six and one-half years of service.
Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant contracted his initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 26
November 1996. He was progressively promoted to the grade of staff
sergeant, with an effective date and date of rank of 1 December 2001. On
18 June 2003, the commander notified him that he was being recommended for
discharge for failure to progress in on-the-job training. The bases for
the proposed action were that, on or about 2 December 2002, the applicant
failed to meet the minimum passing score of 65% on his Career Development
Course (CDC) End of Course (EOC) examination by scoring 50%, for which he
was immediately placed on mandatory two hour study during duty hours and
was required to write a pretest; on or about 26 February 2003, he again
failed to meet the minimum passing score of 65% on his CDC EOC examination
by scoring 52%; and that on or about 5 June 2003, a commander’s evaluation
was conducted to discuss his second failure of the CDC, at which time the
commander determined he received sufficient direct supervision and formal
training to have passed the EOC. The commander also cited that on divers
occasions between on or about 9 October 2002 and on or about 12 November
2002, applicant was derelict in the performance of his duties by willfully
failing to limit his government travel card use to official business, for
which he received an Article 15, dated 31 January 2003, resulting in a
suspended reduction to the grade of senior airman and 14 days of extra
duty. He received an honorable discharge on 21 July 2003, under the
provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Unsatisfactory Performance). He completed a
total of 6 years, 5 months, and 26 days of active service and was serving
in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5) at the time of discharge. He received
an RE Code of “2C,” which defined means "involuntarily separated with an
honorable discharge."
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRS recommends the application be denied and states, in part, the
discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements
of the discharge regulation. The discharge was within the sound discretion
of the discharge authority and the applicant has not submitted any new
evidence or identified any errors or injustices that occurred in the
discharge processing.
The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 13 February 2004 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of
this date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice to warrant upgrading his RE code. In this
respect, we note that the applicant’s discharge appears to be in compliance
with the governing instruction in effect at the time of his separation and
that he was afforded all the rights to which entitled. Furthermore, he
provides no evidence that his separation was inappropriate or that the
assigned RE code reflecting his involuntary separation was in error or
unjust. There being insufficient evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2004-00087
in Executive Session on 1 April 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
Mr. Vance E. Lineberger, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 20 Jan 04, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 11 Feb 04.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Feb 04.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03070
The base legal office reviewed the case and found it legally sufficient to support discharge and recommended applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge without probation and rehabilitation. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS states, based on the documentation on file in the master personnel records, the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03906
Applicant’s complete submission is attached at Exhibit A. Applicant was honorably discharged on 6 Nov 03, in the grade of airman (E-2), under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, by reason of unsatisfactory performance. Applicant’s response to Air Force evaluation is at Exhibit E. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00928
The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action that before recommending the discharge, the applicant was given ample opportunity to study and prepare for his Career Development Course (CDC). _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 4 June 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-01896
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005- 01896 INDEX CODE: 100.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 17 DECEMBER 2006 ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from “2C” to a “3” series to permit reentry into the military. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02930
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02930 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed from “2C” to “1”. He consulted with counsel and submitted a conditional waiver of the rights associated with an administrative discharge board hearing. The waiver request...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-02560
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-02560 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reinstated to active duty or, in the alternative, be granted a Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code that will allow her to enter the Reserves. On 23 Jun 04, the CCQ recommended to the training...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01670
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01670 INDEX NUMBER: 100.06, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed from RE-2 to RE-1 to permit reentry into the military. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-01119
The applicant concurred with his supervisor’s recommendation and stated that he would rather separate from the Air Force instead of retraining. On 16 Jan 09, the applicant received a referral enlisted performance report (EPR), for violations of Article 86, UCMJ, failing to report to duty at the prescribed time and twice failing his CDC EOC exam. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2012-01119 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-01768
At the time she was released, she took her end of course exams twice and failed both times due to working 12 hour days and suffering a miscarriage. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case, however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. ...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-00444 INDEX CODE 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to allow her enlistment in the Armed Forces. Although the applicant states that she requested discharge, there is no letter from the applicant requesting a discharge. Insufficient...