RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03760
INDEX CODE: 110.02
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The applicant makes no contentions.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits a copy of DD Form 293,
Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces
of the United States, a copy of DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty, and a copy of AF Form 100, Request and
Authorization for Separation.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit
A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 14 January 2003. On 27
February 2003, he was diagnosed with migraine headaches and it was
determined that this condition existed prior to his enlistment. In a
written statement, dated 18 February 2003, the applicant acknowledged that
his problem with migraine headaches existed prior to service and he did not
disclose this condition to his recruiter. On 20 February 2003, he was
notified by his commander that he was being recommended for discharge for
fraudulent entry. After being advised of his rights, member waived his
rights to submit statements in his own behalf. He also waived his right to
an attorney. Case was reviewed by the base legal services and found to be
legally sufficient to support discharge. The discharge authority approved
the separation and ordered an uncharacterized, entry-level separation.
On 27 February 2003, he was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208,
Administrative Separation of Airmen (fraudulent entry into military
service) and was issued an entry-level uncharacterized separation. He
received an RE code of 2C, Involuntarily separated with an honorable
discharge; or entry- level separation without characterization of service.
He served 1 month and 14 days total active service.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPRSP recommends denial. Airmen are given entry-level
separation/uncharacterized service characterization when separation is
initiated in the first 180 days of continuous active service. The
Department of Defense (DoD) determined if a member served less than 180
days of continuous active service, it would be unfair to the member and the
service to characterize their limited service. Therefore, his
uncharacterized character of service is correct and in accordance with DoD
and Air Force instructions. The applicant did not submit any errors or
injustices that occurred in the discharge process. Additionally, he
provided no facts warranting a change in his discharge.
The DPPRSP evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 19 Dec
03, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office
has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. After a thorough review of the
available evidence and the applicant's complete submission, the Board is
not persuaded that the applicant has been the victim of an error or
injustice. At the time members are separated from the Air Force, they are
furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and
circumstances of their separation. We believe that given the circumstances
surrounding the applicant’s separation, the RE code issued was in
accordance with the appropriate directives. Therefore, we find no basis
upon which to recommend favorable action on this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-03760
in Executive Session on 3 February 2004, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Charlene Bradley, Panel Chair
Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
Ms. Ms. Martha Maust, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Oct 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPRSP, dated 26 Nov 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Dec 03.
Charlene Bradley
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01984
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a DD Form 293, Application for the Review of Discharge or Dismissal from the Armed Forces of the United States, a personal statement, and extracts from his military personnel and medical records. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPAE evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to applicant on 21 Nov 03...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03452
On 15 May 03, applicant requested voluntary separation from the Air Force. After review, the Medical Consultant recommends denial and states she was medically disqualified from the air traffic control career field due to migraine headaches. Therefore, we recommend her records be corrected as indicated below.
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02212
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02212 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized entry-level separation be changed to honorable and the narrative reason changed from “Fraudulent Entry Into Military Service.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01900
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01900 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncharacterized discharge be changed to a medical discharge. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not properly discharged from the Air Force. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01903
The discharge authority concurred with the recommendation and directed that he be discharged with an entry-level separation. The Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that at the time of his discharge on 6 May 2002, he was issued an Reenlistment...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00113
On 25 February 2002, the applicant’s commander recommended the applicant’s discharge for defective enlistment. The applicant did not provide any evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge process. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/ DPPRS, dated 23 Jan 07.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03735 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXX-XX-XXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2C,” “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge: or entry level separation without characterization of service,” be changed to RE Code...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02068
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02068 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DES IRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligibility (RE) code and narrative reason for separation be changed. In support of his request, the applicant submits a letter from his wife, two letters of recommendation and a copy of his DD Form...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03811
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03811 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The narrative reason for his separation, listed in Block 28 of the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, of Fraudulent Entry into Military Service be changed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01808
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01808 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reenlistment eligible (RE) code be changed to a 1, which will enable him to reenter the military. On 27 April 1999, the applicant was notified by his commander that he was recommending he be discharged from the Air Force due to...