Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03662
Original file (BC-2003-03662.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-03362
            INDEX CODE:  108.00
            COUNSEL:  Ada Whitte

            HEARING DESIRED:  Not Indicated

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His entry-level separation be changed  to  reflect  that  he  was  medically
separated.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He believes that entry-level separation is  for  individuals  who  have  not
completed basic training.  He completed training and his discharge  occurred
while he was in technical school.  The code in the  remarks  section  states
that he knew of his asthma.  He  has  supplied  a  letter  from  his  mother
indicating that he never before had asthma.

In support of his request applicant provided a letter from  his  mother  and
his discharge order.  His  complete  submission,  with  attachments,  is  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The  applicant's  military  personnel  records  cannot  be  located.    Data
extracted from the available documentation reflects that he enlisted in  the
Regular Air Force on 28 May 02 in the grade of airman  first  class.   While
attending Security Forces technical training  he  was  referred  to  Wilford
Hall Medical Center and evaluated for asthma.  He was diagnosed with  asthma
and discharged due to the medical disqualification.  He was discharged on  2
Oct  02,  and  provided  an  uncharacterized  entry-level   separation   for
erroneous entry.  He served 4 months and 5 days on active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The BCMR Medical  Consultant  recommends  denial.   The  Medical  Consultant
states the applicant developed symptoms suggestive of asthma while in  basic
and technical  training  and  was  shown  to  demonstrate  abnormal  airways
reactivity consistent with  chronic  airways  inflammation  (asthma).   This
condition is medically disqualifying for military service.   He  reported  a
history of mild symptoms prior to entering training and further  reported  a
family history of asthma  and  a  personal  history  of  allergic  rhinitis.
Asthma, including reactive airways disease,  exercise  induced  bronchospasm
or  asthmatic  bronchitis,   reliably   diagnosed   is   disqualifying   for
enlistment.  Although he may not have asthma in  the  strictest  definition,
he demonstrated symptoms consistent  with  abnormal  reactive  airways  that
interfered with training.  The Air Force  and  other  services  have  become
very strict with regard to asthma and  reactive  airways  disease  based  on
past experience and the high number of casualties  in  members  deployed  to
operational and overseas locations.

Airmen are in entry-level status during the first  180  days  on  continuous
military service and does not attempt to characterize the service as  either
good or bad.  Erroneous enlistment is one that would not have  occurred  had
the relevant facts been known by the Air Force and was  not  the  result  of
fraudulent conduct on the part of  the  member.   The  Medical  Consultant's
evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant's  counsel
on 13 Mar 04 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this  date,  this
office has received no response.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing  law  or
regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been  presented  to  demonstrate  the
existence of error or injustice.  We see no evidence which would lead us  to
believe that a medical condition existed at  the  time  of  his  separation,
which would have  qualified  him  for  consideration  under  the  disability
evaluation system in accordance with the governing  Air  Force  instruction.
We  are  compelled  to  note  that  uncharacterized  separation  is  not  an
unfavorable reflection upon the applicant's military service nor  should  it
be confused with other types of separation.  Rather, a as was noted  by  the
Air Force, an entry-level separation with uncharacterized  service  is  used
in those cases where the member has not yet completed six months of  service
at the time separation proceedings were initiated,  rather  than  for  those
not completing basic training as believed to be the case by  the  applicant.
Therefore, we agree with the opinion and recommendation  of  the  Air  Force
office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as basis for  our
conclusion that the applicant has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or
injustice.  In  the  absence  of  evidence  to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling  basis  to  recommend  granting  the  relief   sought   in   this
application.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented  did  not  demonstrate
the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the  application  was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only  be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant  evidence  not
considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the  Board  considered  Docket  Number     BC-2003-
03362 in Executive Session on 3 Jun 04, under  the  provisions  of  AFI  36-
2603:

      Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Panel Chair
      Ms. Martha A. Maust, Member
      Ms. Renee M. Collier, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 1 Oct 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 24 Feb 04.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Mar 04.




                                   GREGORY H. PETKOFF
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01107

    Original file (BC-2003-01107.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-01107 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed so she may enlist in another service. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00962

    Original file (BC-2005-00962.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant received an uncharacterized entry-level separation on 18 Nov 04, by reason of “Erroneous Entry (Other),” and was issued an RE code of 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service). The applicant was administratively discharged on 18 Nov 04 with an entry level separation (uncharacterized service) for erroneous enlistment due to existing prior to service asthma after 4 months and 13 days on active duty. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01556

    Original file (BC-2003-01556.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Based on symptoms consistent with reactive airways disease and asthma and the positive bronchoprovocation test confirming abnormal bronchial reactivity, he underwent entry-level separation. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states he was sick with a bad case of bronchitis when he was tested for asthma. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 17 Sep 03.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-01056

    Original file (BC-2004-01056.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01056 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to reenter the Air Force. The reason for the commander’s action was the receipt of a medical narrative summary, dated 15 Jan 04, which found the applicant did not meet minimum medical standards to...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01107A

    Original file (BC-2003-01107A.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01107 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: YES _______________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: By amendment at Exhibit K, the applicant requests her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed to “Secretarial Authority” and she be given a medical disability retirement. The following documentary evidence was...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-01894

    Original file (BC-2006-01894.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    He was tested for asthma and subsequently discharged from the Air Force. Furthermore, the Medical Consultant states in order to qualify for MGIB benefits, the applicant was required to complete 36 months of active duty service and receive an honorable discharge. The applicant's concealment of a disqualifying medical condition at the time of enlistment examination and non-distinguished conduct while in training does not merit action by the Secretary to change his characterization of...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-03273

    Original file (BC-2004-03273.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining facts pertaining to the applicant’s medical issues are discussed in the advisory opinion provided by the AFBCMR Medical Consultant at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Medical Consultant recommended denial noting that during her enlistment medical examination, she completed a DD Form 2807, Report of Medical History. A complete copy of the Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00457

    Original file (BC-2005-00457.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-00457 INDEX NUMBER: 145.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXx COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 7 Aug 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her entry level separation for “Erroneous Entry” be changed to “disabled.” _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00218

    Original file (BC-2004-00218.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant recommends the application be denied. Although the applicant is presently doing well as indicated by a recent allergy evaluation, the record clearly shows she was experiencing physical problems while in training and her symptoms, suggestive of asthma or reactive airways disease, required her separation from the Air Force at that time. Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01757

    Original file (BC-2002-01757.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01757 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty), Block 28, Narrative Reason for Separation, be changed from “Erroneous Enlistment.” ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT...