RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-02132
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Narrative Reason for Separation on her DD Form 214 be changed from
Personality Disorder.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She was misdiagnosed by military physicians. The military physicians
diagnosed her as having a Personality Disorder. The Department of
Veterans Affairs physicians diagnosed her symptoms as Graves’ Disease.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 21 February 2001 for a
period of six years as an airman.
A mental health evaluation report dated 29 July 2001, states the
applicant was first seen in the Life Skills Support Center on
24 October 2001, for feelings of hopelessness, anxiety, decreased
sleep, concentration and appetite. The applicant associated her
symptoms with the recent deployment of her boyfriend and two friends
and her own upcoming deployment. She was diagnosed with an Adjustment
Disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. The applicant was
removed from deployment and treated with therapy and medication and
many of her acute symptoms resolved. In March 2002, she was removed
from profile and returned to World Wide Qualified (WWQ) status. The
applicant was deployed in Support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF),
however, she returned early from OEF due to feelings of hopelessness
and depression, frequent tearfulness, and difficulties with sleeping,
concentration and appetite.
On 6 August 2002, the applicant was informed of her commander’s intent
to recommend her for discharge for a condition that interferes with
military service (mental disorder).
The commander advised the applicant of her right to consult legal
counsel and that legal counsel had been obtained to assist her; and to
submit statements in her own behalf, or waive the above rights after
consulting with counsel.
The commander indicated in his recommendation for discharge action
that if his recommendation was approved, the applicant's service would
be characterized as honorable.
On 7 August 2002, after consulting with counsel, applicant waived her
right to submit a statement.
A legal review was conducted on 7 August 2002, in which the staff
judge advocate (SJA) recommended the applicant be discharged with an
honorable discharge.
On 15 August 2002, the Discharge Authority approved and ordered the
applicant be discharged with an honorable discharge without probation
and rehabilitation.
The applicant was discharged on 16 August 2002, in the grade of airman
first class with an honorable discharge. She served 1 year, 5 months
and 26 days of active duty service.
Upon application to the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA), the
applicant was awarded on 29 May 2003, a combined disability rating of
40 percent for service connected Irritable Bowel Syndrome (30 percent)
and Graves’ Disease (an autoimmune disorder that presents with an
overproduction of thyroid hormone leading to hyperthyroidism, which
can aggravate other preexisting mental health conditions (10 percent).
The DVA rating decision further indicated that the mental health
examiner found no current evidence of a mental condition and the
applicant’s symptoms while on active duty were due to Graves’ Disease.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The Chief Medical Consultant, AFBCMR, states the applicant was
discharged for unsuitability due to a personality disorder. However,
a year after being discharged she was diagnosed with Graves’ Disease
by the DVA. In March 2002, the applicant’s physician noted the
applicant’s thyroid gland was slightly enlarged and she reported areas
of skin de-pigmentation. The appropriate screening blood test was
ordered but the results are not in the applicant’s medical records.
The applicant did not present with the typical signs and symptoms of
hyperthyroidism while on active duty such as, unexplained rapid heart
rate, fever and weight loss. In fact, she experienced constipation
when the typical symptom of hyperthyroidism is increased frequency of
bowel movements. The Medical Consultant further states based on the
preponderance of evidence evaluated by the DVA, it is likely that the
applicant was experiencing the effects of Graves’ Disease while on
active duty which may have contributed to her emotional state. Given
that there were signs of Graves’ Disease when she was diagnosed with a
Personality Disorder in 2002, and her initial duty performance was
excellent, the validity of her diagnosis of personality disorder is
questionable. Therefore, Medical Consultant recommends the
applicant’s narrative reason for separation be changed from
Personality Disorder to Secretarial Authority.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
HQ AFPC/DPPRS states based on the documentation in the applicant’s
master personnel file, her discharge was consistent with the
procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation.
AFPC/DPPRS further states if the Board decides to grant the requested
relief the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason for
separation should be changed from Personality Disorder to Secretarial
Authority with a separation program designator code of KFF.
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on
19 December 2003, for review and response. As of this date, no
response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice to warrant changing the
applicant’s narrative reason for separation. The Board, after
carefully reviewing this application, agrees with the opinions and
recommendations of the Air Force and the AFBCMR Medical Consultant
that it appears the applicant was experiencing the effects of Graves’
disease while on active duty which contributed to her emotional
state. The applicant’s records indicate she graduated with honors
from BMT and her initial duty performance was excellent. Therefore,
the Board believes the validity of the diagnosis of Personality
Disorder is questionable and that it would be an injustice for the
applicant to continue to suffer the adverse effects of such a
characterization. Accordingly, we recommend that her records be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show the narrative reason for
separation, issued in conjunction with her honorable discharge on 16
August 2002, was “Secretarial Authority” and the Separation Program
Designator (SPD) code was “KFF.”
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-02132 in Executive Session on 10 February 2004, under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Jr., Panel Chair
Ms. Sharon B. Seymour, Member
Mr. Garry G. Sauner, Member
All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Jun 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR Medical Consultant, dated
19 Nov 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, dated 16 Dec 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 Dec 03.
ROSCOE HINTON, JR.
Panel Chair
AFBCMR BC-2003-02132
INDEX CODE: 110.00
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction for Military Records and under the
authority of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat
116) it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show the
narrative reason for separation, issued in conjunction with her
honorable discharge on 16 August 2002, was “Secretarial Authority”
and the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code was “KFF.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | bc 2012 01218
In support of her request, the applicant provides a personal statement, copies of a letter from her civilian medical provider, extracts from her medical records, AF Form 356, and other various documents in support of her application. On 29 Apr 11, the IPEB reviewed the applicants case, found her unfit and recommended she be removed from the TDRL and discharged with severance pay with a compensable disability rating of 10 percent for chronic law back pain in accordance with the Veterans...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01110 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for discharge be changed from “Personality Disorder” to either “Panic Disorder” or simply state “Medical discharge without diagnosis shown.” By amendment at Exhibit G, applicant requests that her DD Form 214...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03756
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03756 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C be changed to 3K, and the narrative reason for separation be changed from “Personality Disorder” to “Secretarial Authority.” _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01790
By memorandum dated 5 Apr 03, the applicant amended the above request to request that the Board approve replacement of his original PRFs with revised PRFs, signed by his senior rater, for the Calendar Year (CY) 1999B (99B) and CY00A Central Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards. Additional relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the evaluations prepared by the appropriate offices of the Air Force found at Exhibits C, D, and...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001066112C070421
APPLICANT STATES : That she received a profile to take an alternate Army physical fitness test (APFT) and her command refused to give it to her. The applicant failed her first APFT in May 2000 and it appears she failed one or two other, non-record APFTs before a second record APFT failure in September 2000. She provides no evidence to show that she sought medical attention to discover if her thyroid condition or any medical condition could have been the reason for her APFT failures.
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1998-00462
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the AFBCMR Medical Consultant (Exhibit C). This evaluation resulted in a diagnosis of “Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood.” She was recommended for involuntary separation under provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.11.1, Mental Disorders. The Separation Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that provided HQ AFPC/DPPD determines the applicant’s reason for separation should remain...
The relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the AFBCMR Medical Consultant (Exhibit C). This evaluation resulted in a diagnosis of “Adjustment Disorder with Mixed Anxiety and Depressed Mood.” She was recommended for involuntary separation under provisions of AFI 36-3208, paragraph 5.11.1, Mental Disorders. The Separation Branch, HQ AFPC/DPPRS, stated that provided HQ AFPC/DPPD determines the applicant’s reason for separation should remain...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01789
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was diagnosed with thyroid cancer, which provided clinical evidence that she had a real medical problem that produced the symptoms and conditions used to suggest the diagnosis of Dysthymia and Personality Disorder. She was diagnosed with thyroid cancer only four months after her discharge from the Air Force. The BCMR Medical Consultant concludes that the applicant’s diagnosis of personality...
The medical record clearly shows that while the applicant may have been treated for various medical conditions while on active duty, none were serious enough to render her unfit for further military service under the provisions of disability law and policy. In this respect, we note that while the applicant may have been treated for various medical conditions while on active duty, none were serious enough at the time of her discharge to render her unfit for further military service. The...
AF | BCMR | CY1999 | BC-1997-00995
The medical record clearly shows that while the applicant may have been treated for various medical conditions while on active duty, none were serious enough to render her unfit for further military service under the provisions of disability law and policy. In this respect, we note that while the applicant may have been treated for various medical conditions while on active duty, none were serious enough at the time of her discharge to render her unfit for further military service. The...