RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01357
INDEX CODE: 102.07
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His records be corrected to reflect that he was commissioned a second
lieutenant.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
His discharge records should indicate the rank of second lieutenant. He
was sworn in and commissioned as a second lieutenant in the Air Force in
April 1976 after completing two (2) years in the AF Reserve Officer
Training Corp (AFROTC). After completing the AFROTC training he was
discharged due to a reduction in force. He later received a discharge
certificate that indicated his rank as a second lieutenant, which he lost
during a move.
In support of his request, applicant provided a personal statement, a copy
of Reserve Order CC-5317, Department of the Air Force HQ Air Reserve
Personnel Center, a copy of DD Form 4, Enlistment Contract-Armed Forces of
the United States, a copy of Training, a copy of a letter from the
Department of the Air Force, and a copy of his college transcript.
His complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserves (USAFR) on 4
September 1974, as an AFROTC cadet. On 14 July 1975, he was disenrolled
and discharged from AFROTC program as a result of the Air Force requirement
to reduce officer strength. His rank at the time of disenrollment was
airman basic and he was issued a discharge order and certificate with his
rank.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ ARPC/DPP recommends denial. After reviewing the applicant’s records,
there is no indication he was ever commissioned as an officer in either the
Air Force or the Air Force Reserves.
The DPP evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Jul
03, for review and response within 30 days. As of this date, no response
has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. Evidence has not been provided which
would lead us to believe that the rules of the applicable regulations,
which implement the law, were inappropriately applied or that he was denied
rights to which he was entitled. Therefore, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt
their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not
been the victim of an error or injustice. In the absence of persuasive
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief
sought in this application.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-01357
in Executive Session on 19 August 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair
Mr. Roscoe Hinton, Member
Ms. Cheryl Jacobson, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 Apr 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 20 May 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jul 03.
RICHARD A. PETERSON
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2004-02538-2
On his request, dated 31 May 06, the applicant requests his records be reviewed to determine if he was penalized six months of active service based on being inadvertently discharged while in Palace Option status. The retention/retirement date of 30 September was reestablished in 1997 and the points were realigned to the 10 May retention/retirement date (based on his commissioning service date). Exhibit I. Addendum to the Recording of Proceedings, dated 26 Aug 05, with Exhibits.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02052
DPP states that the applicant attended the school in a civilian (Air National Guard Technician) status that precluded him from receiving federal compensation from two sources for the same time period. ARPC/DPP’s complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 July 2003 for review and comment within 30 days. We took notice...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04500
The applicant presently has a valid commission in the Reserve of the Air Force, is assigned to HQ ARPC, and the recoupment of AFROTC scholarship money was without any legal basis. All back pay and allowances Counsels complete response, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ THE ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: USAF/AlP concurs with the applicants request that all documents related to her disenrollment from AFROTC be removed from...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-01921
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-01921 INDEX NUMBER: 110.00 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her disenrollment from the Air Force Reserve Officer Training Corps (AFROTC) program due to medical disqualification be voided. She never received adequate counsel as requested and never received a complete copy...
For a reserve member to be credited with a year of satisfactory service, 50 retirement points are required. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant contends that he performed numerous days of creditable service that were not documented for which he received no credit. Based on the evidence of record and that verified by HQ Air Reserve Personnel Center...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2001-00122
On 20 May 97, the applicant was advised in writing of HQ AFROTC’s decision, and notified that he would be required to complete the PFT, 1.5 mile run, and meet weight and body fat standards for commissioning. In regards to the applicant’s allegation that the debt of $77,000 is disproportionate, he states that maintaining body fat standards is a training requirement specified in the AFROTC contract. Counsel also asserts that AFOATS/JA glosses over the fact that when the applicant was weighed...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant's military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Deputy Staff Judge Advocate, AFOATS/JA, reviewed the application and states that if there was an error, it was not an error initiated by...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02310
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. On 12 Aug 02, the 9 AETF commander determined the Article 15 would be filed in the applicant’s officer selection record (OSR). On 11 Sep 02, the applicant was notified that the 21 SW commander at Peterson AFB was recommending the applicant’s name be removed from the promotion list.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-1999-02923a
On 25 Oct 01, the AFBCMR was notified that in conjunction with the FY02 Air Force Reserve Line and Nonline Colonel Promotion Selection Boards, the applicant was recommended for promotion to major by the A0497A – Judge Advocate General (JAG) Major Promotion Board. On 15 Nov 01, the AFBMCR corrected the applicant’s records to show that; he was considered and selected for promotion to the Reserve grade of Major by the FY97 JAG Major Promotion Board, with a date of rank and effective date of 30...
He be commissioned a second lieutenant in the Air Force and placed in the Reserve. Counsel’s response was received after the 30-day timeframe and after the applicant’s case had been considered by the Board (Exhibit F). ___________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 15 March 2001, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Mr. Richard A. Peterson, Panel Chair Mr. Steven A. Shaw, Member Mr....