RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 03-00743
INDEX CODE: 107.00
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He receive backpay for 0-1E, 0-2E, and 0-3E for the periods he served
within the officer grades from October 1982 to February 1995.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
When he separated from the Air Force in September 1980, he had 4 years
of active duty. The pay charts effective 1 October 1981 through 1
January 1984 state “applicable to officers with at least 4 years of
active service as an enlisted member or as a non-commissioned warrant
officer.” He had exactly 4 years, yet when he came back on active
duty in 1982, he was not paid the higher pay. The pay charts for 1981
through 1987 state “with at least 4 years,” then in January 1988 the
wording changed to “more than 4 years active duty.” Then in July 2000
the wording changed again to “4 years and 1 day.”
In support of his application, he provided copies of his separation
documents associated with his release from active duty on 15 September
1980 and copies of military Pay Charts effective during the years
1981, 1982, 1984, 1985, 1987, 1988 and 2000. Applicant's complete
submission, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Information extracted from the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS)
indicates that the applicant was appointed a second lieutenant,
Reserve of the Air Force on 8 May 1982 and was voluntarily ordered to
extended active duty on 20 October 1982. His Total Active Federal
Military Service Date was established as 20 October 1978 based on four
years of prior enlisted service from 16 September 1976 to 15 September
1980. He is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
lieutenant colonel, with a date of rank and effective date of 1 June
2000.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
DFAS-POCC/DE recommends the application be denied. DFAS-POCC
indicated that, in accordance with Department of Defense Financial
Management Regulation, (DoDFMR), Volume 7a, paragraph 010301B, a
service member must have at least four years and one day of prior
active service as an enlisted member to be entitled to the special
rate for pay grades 0-1E, 0-2E, or 0-3E. The DFAS-POCC/DE evaluation,
with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
Pursuant to the Board’s request, USAF/JAA reviewed this application
and recommends denial. JAA states that the applicant’s enlisted
service falls short of the four years required to qualify for 0-XE pay
during his active service in the officer grades 0-1 through 0-3.
Applicant admits that he knew his pay was incorrect for nearly a
quarter century, yet failed to exercise due diligence in pursuing his
claim. Based on a request for clarification, USAF/JAA determined that
their research indicated that in order to receive 0-XE pay it required
over four years active service as an enlisted member or warrant
officer. USAF/JAA evaluations are at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 25 April 2003, a copy of the DFAS-POCC-DE evaluation was forwarded
to the applicant for review and comment. As of this date, this office
has not received a response.
On 30 July 2003, a copy of the USAF/JAA evaluation was forwarded to
the applicant for review and comment (See Exhibit F).
On 22 August 2003, the applicant responded to the USAF/JAA evaluation
by stating that it hasn’t been very long that pay charts from previous
years have been available to view on a moments notice through the DFAS
website. As he was reviewing his career, he came across the pay
charts with the different wording and based upon the wording when he
was commissioned in 1982, he should have been paid under the 0-1E, 0-
2E, 0-3E pay scale until he was promoted to major in 1995. On 28
November 2003, the applicant stated that he is seeking this correction
based upon justice. As he has previously stated, he was reviewing his
career and based upon the wording in the pay charts at the time of his
commissioning, he should have been paid under the 0-1E, 0-2E, 0-3E pay
scale (See Exhibit G).
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice. We took careful notice of the
applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case.
His contentions in this regard were noted; however, in our opinion,
the Air Force offices of primary responsibility have adequately
addressed these contentions and we are in agreement with their
assessment of his case. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the
contrary, we find no basis to grant relief.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only
be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence
not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 03-
00743 in Executive Sessions on 9 July 2003, 5 September 2003, and 15
December 2003 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Ms. Brenda L. Romine., Panel Chair
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Feb 03, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Microfiche Military Personnel
Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, DFAS-POCC/DE, dated 8 Apr 03 w/atchs.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Apr 03.
Exhibit E. Letters, USAF/JAA, dated 28 Jul 03 and 23 Oct 03.
Exhibit F. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 30 Jul 03 and 30 Oct 03.
Exhibit G. Applicant’s Letters, dated 22 Aug 03 and
28 Nov 03.
BRENDA L. ROMINE
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01298
During this timeframe, DFAS informed the MPF the applicant could not receive a 2002 TSP payment since his request for a bonus to be distributed in TSP was not established until 2003. The applicant requests a CSB installment payment in the amount of $10,000 be applied retroactively to his TSP account effective 23 Oct 02, along with any interest he may have accrued. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01821
The DFAS-DE/POCT evaluation is at Exhibit D. Pursuant to the Board’s request, USAF/JAA reviewed the application and states that the applicant entered into an Army Senior ROTC Scholarship contract on or about 16 November 1998. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that competent authority determined that he was allowed to serve...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2012 | 20120022401
The DFAS official stated that the applicant requested correction to pay entitlement from 16 August 1982 to 30 April 1994 because he completed over 4 years of previous active enlisted service prior to becoming a commissioned officer. His record should be corrected to show, as of 16 August 1982, he was entitled to pay at the rate of O-1E for over 4 years of enlisted service. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2001 | 2001054828C070420
The applicant requests correction of his military records to show that his retired pay grade is 0-3E instead of 0-3. Based on the foregoing, the applicant is entitled to correction of his military records to show his retired pay grade as 0-3E, not 0-3. Correction of the DA Form 3713 (Data for Retired Pay), dated 5 May 1992, to show the applicant completed over 4 years of active service as an enlisted member in item 29 (Basic Pay); and
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2001-00580A
The applicant’s complete review is at Exhibit K. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL HQ USAF/JAA EVALUATION: HQ USAF/JAA reiterates that the applicant’s original debt of $50,669.90 was reduced to $25,669.90 and, to the extent that his reconsideration request was for the repayment of this validly established debt owed to the US, it should be denied. DFAS summarizes the applicant’s indebtedness and adjustments thereto as follows: $50,669.90 Original...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2010 | 20100015586
He also provides his April 2010 LES which shows his PEBD (Pay Entry Basic date) as 3 February 1976 (the date he initially enlisted in the USAR) and that he was receiving pay based on 34 years of total service. Section 010101 (service which is creditable) states for most members who enter and serve on active duty without a break in service, the basic pay date is the date the member enters active or inactive service. d. Section 010103A(2) (Creditable Prior Enlisted Service) states...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2002 | 2002079761C070215
The DD Form 214 issued to the applicant on 17 April 1988 confirms that he entered active duty on 7 June 1977, and he continuously served in that status for 8 years, 10 months, and 11 days until being honorably separated, in the rank and pay grade of staff sergeant/E-6 (SSG/E-6), in order to accept a commission The evidence of record confirms that the applicant served on active duty in an enlisted status for 8 years, 10 months, and 11 days. That all of the Department of the Army records...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2011 | 20110021699
The applicant requests, in effect, relief from the 6-year barring statute in order to receive payment for military service performed and correction of her basic pay rate as a commissioned officer to show she had 1,460 retirement points as an enlisted member and therefore, is entitled to payment of the difference in E pay for the years 2004 through 2006. Her OMPF contains a National Guard Bureau Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) for the period ending 19 April 2000, which...
ARMY | BCMR | CY2006 | 20060012148C071029
Qawiy A. Sabree | |Member | The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. The applicant requests that his retired pay be corrected to show he retired as an O-3E (a captain with over four years enlisted service). There is no evidence to show the “commitment” that the applicant would be paid retired pay as an O-3E was ever put in writing.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01739
___________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was commissioned an officer in the Reserve of the Air Force on 7 February 1997. ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: DPPRS recommends denial. _________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material...