Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00589
Original file (BC-2003-00589.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00589
            INDEX CODE:  107.00

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED:  NO

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal for Operation  JUST
CAUSE, Panama.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He flew a mission on 20 and 21 December  1989  as  an  aircrew  member
(flight engineer) on an AWACS mission from Tinker AFB, OK,  supporting
Operation JUST CAUSE.  He retired from the  Air  Force  prior  to  the
award of this AFEM for this action, and it was not entered on  his  DD
Form 214.  He just learned of this award last week, and would like  to
have this award entered in his records and be presented.

In support of the appeal,  applicant  submits  a  page  from  the  VFW
Magazine discussing the eligibility criteria for the award, a copy  of
his DD Form 214, a copy of  his  Special  Order,  relieving  him  from
active duty, and a copy of his flight records.

Applicant's complete submission,  with  attachments,  is  attached  at
Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

Applicant’s last tour of active duty was  during  the  period  9 March
1988 - 28 February 1990.  He  was  retired  in  the  grade  of  master
sergeant (E-7) due to length of service on 1 March 1990, having served
20 years and 29 days on active duty.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR states  that  the  applicant’s  Individual  Flight  Records
provided with his DD Form 149 were checked with combat pilots at AFPC,
who informed DPPPR that the records provided were not  the  ones  that
would substantiate the applicant’s  claims.   In  order  to  determine
whether or not he participated in an operation, the  records  need  to
reflect  the  Mission  Code  (  01-Combat  Sortie;  02-Combat  Support
Sortie),  since  the  Individual  Flight  Records  do  not  show   the
destination of the flights, only the hours flown.  DPPPR informed  the
applicant that the Individual  Flight  Records  he  provided  did  not
contain the necessary information to substantiate his claim.   He  was
provided the information needed to obtain the necessary forms with the
needed information.  He was also informed that it would probably  take
more than 30 days to obtain the proper forms,  and  he  was  asked  to
withdraw his application until he could obtain the records that  would
assist him.  He did not respond.  The  last  TDY  information  in  his
records shows South America on   18  January  1989  for  24  days  and
Iceland on 18 July 1989 for 24 days.  This is  no  indication  in  the
applicant’s records that he  participated  in  Operation  JUST  CAUSE;
therefore, they can not verify his eligibility for an additional Armed
Forces Expeditionary Medal.  Therefore, they recommend disapproval  of
applicant’s request.

A complete copy of the evaluation, with  attachment,  is  attached  at
Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 30 May 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation  was  forwarded  to
the applicant for review and response within  30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.    The applicant has exhausted all remedies  provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.    The application was not timely filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.    Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
and adopt their rationale as the basis for  the  conclusion  that  the
applicant  has  not  been  the  victim  of  an  error  or   injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,  we  find  no
compelling basis to recommend  granting  the  relief  sought  in  this
application.

_________________________________________________________________



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered this application, AFBCMR
Docket No. BC-2003-00589, in Executive Session on 9 July  2003,  under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

                       Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Panel Chair
                       Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
                       Mr. James W. Russell III, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

      Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Feb 03, w/atchs.
      Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
      Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 27 May 03.
      Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 03.




                             BRENDA L. ROMINE
                             Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03307

    Original file (BC-2003-03307.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Air Medal (AM) that was awarded to him on 4 November 2002 by the Secretary of the Air Force Personnel Council (SAFPC) is not the appropriate decoration for his actions. The control cables were severed, and the aircraft could not be landed safely without the cables controlling the flaps. DPPPR states the DFC is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by heroism or extraordinary achievement while participating in flight.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00599

    Original file (BC-2003-00599.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant departed for the European Theater of Operations (ETO) on 9 October 1944. DPPPR states that the Purple Heart Review Board recommended disapproval because frostbite is not a qualifying condition for award of the Purple Heart Medal, and the applicant did not provide any documentation showing he was wounded or injured as a direct result of enemy action. The DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00244

    Original file (BC-2003-00244.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00244 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, we are not persuaded that he should be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00355

    Original file (BC-2003-00355.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR states that the applicant has not provided any documentation showing he was recommended for, or awarded, the DFC. A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPWB states that a review of the applicant’s record indicates he was a POW from 13 April 1944 to 3 May 1945, approximately 13 months. A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03790

    Original file (BC-2002-03790.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided copies of a letter of appreciation, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, and a Certificate of Appreciation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to applicant on 21 Feb 03 for review and response. As of this date, no response...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-04015

    Original file (BC-2003-04015.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the statement from the former POW, the majority of the Board is not persuaded the applicant was wounded as a direct result of enemy action. The applicant is a former Army Air Corps B-17, Flying Fortress, navigator who seeks award of the Purple Heart (PH) for wounds received during a bombing mission over Berlin, Germany, on 20 February 1944. The majority of the panel finds insufficient evidence to demonstrate that he was injured...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02189

    Original file (BC-2002-02189.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The applicant was assigned to the 367 Bombardment Squadron, in the European Theater of Operations as a Navigator, from 15 November 1943 through 11 June 1945, when he returned to the Continental United States. By letter, dated 3 December 2002, AFPC/DPW, requested that the applicant’s discharge document be corrected to reflect he was a POW from 13 December 1943 to 13 May 1945 and that he be considered for award of the Purple Heart (See Exhibit D). The applicant contends that he should...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03776

    Original file (BC-2002-03776.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03776 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Recommendation for Decoration Printout (RDP) date for the Aerial Achievement Medal (AAM) he was awarded be changed from 21 January 2003 to 29 April 2002. The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPWB recommends the application be denied,...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00813

    Original file (BC-2004-00813.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    At times, he became responsible for up to two- thirds of the sovereign United States (US) airspace. Second, Air Force Instruction 36-2803 states “Evaluate all related facts regarding the service of any person before recommending or awarding a decoration.” For retirement decorations, “Review records and consider the individual’s entire career to determine the appropriate level of decoration for retirement.” It appears that this decoration did not have that information available for...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02556

    Original file (BC-2002-02556.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02556 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC) and his Air Medal (AM) be updated to reflect 28 missions flown during World War II. AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit...