Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00253
Original file (BC-2003-00253.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2003-00253
            INDEX NUMBER:  107.00
      XXXXXXXXXXXXXX   COUNSEL:  None

      XXX-XX-XXXX      HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) for his  service
in Vietnam.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He believes that he should have this award because his unit in Vietnam
was awarded it.

The complete evaluation is at Exhibit A.

_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant entered the Air Force on 16 Jul 69 and was released from
active duty on 13 Jul 73 with an honorable discharge.  The applicant’s
records reflect that he  was  awarded  the  National  Defense  Service
Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal,  and
the Air Force Good Conduct Medal.

_________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPPPR recommends denial of the applicant’s request.  He  did  not
provide any  documentation  showing  he  was  awarded  the  Air  Force
Commendation Medal.

The complete evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the  applicant  on
23 May 03 for review and comment within 30 days.  To date, a  response
has not been received.

_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing  law
or regulations.

2.  The application was not  timely  filed;  however,  it  is  in  the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented  to  demonstrate
the  existence  of  error  or  injustice.   We  took  notice  of   the
applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the  case;
however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force
office of primary responsibility and  adopt  their  rationale  as  the
basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of
an error or injustice.  We  also  note  that  they  have  updated  the
applicant’s records to reflect all awards they have determined  he  is
entitled to.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to  the  contrary,
we find no compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in
this application.

_______________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_______________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2003-
00253 in Executive Session on 16 July 2003, under  the  provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Michael K. Gallogly, Panel Chair
      Mr. John B. Hennessey, Member
      Ms. Barbara J. White-Olson, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 Jan 03, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 9 May 03.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 May 03.




                                   MICHAEL K. GALLOGLY
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03994

    Original file (BC-2003-03994.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03994 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His records do not reflect that in 1968 he served in Vietnam for 30 days and in China for 15 days. ...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00956

    Original file (BC-2003-00956.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00956 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart Medal (PHM) and it be added to his Report of Separation. DPPPR notes that they informed the applicant of the criteria, including the documentation, necessary to process his claim for award of the PHM...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01051

    Original file (BC-2003-01051.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Further, DPPPR argues to award the applicant the DFC after he was awarded a medal for his actions would be an injustice to all other recipients of the AM awarded for actions similar to those of the applicant. DPPRSP’s letter to the applicant, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted additional documentation, through his congressman, withdrawing his request for the AFC and requested that his AM be upgraded to a DFC. Applicant’s...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03156

    Original file (BC-2003-03156.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-03156 INDEX CODE: 107.00, 110.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Discharge or Release from Active Duty, be corrected to include the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) and the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM). Regarding the AFGCM, DPPPR states he...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03365

    Original file (BC-2003-03365.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Since the 7th and 13th Air Forces’ Decoration Review Boards reviewed all decorations at that time, they were in the best position to determine which recommendations for the BSM should be awarded and which should be downgraded to the AFCM in order to provide consistency in decorations. DPPPR concluded by stating that the applicant has not made any effort for almost 30 years to have his AFCM (1OLC) upgraded; has not provided any documents showing he submitted a request for upgrade through...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01458

    Original file (BC-2003-01458.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01458 INDEX CODE: 113.00 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: Michael C. Stevenson XXXXXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect service time in the Philippines and Vietnam and he be awarded the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal (AFEM) or Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-02516

    Original file (BC-2003-02516.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 does not reflect the medal for the time he served in Saudi Arabia or that he contributed in the Post-Vietnam Era Veterans’ Educational Assistance Program. In support of his appeal, applicant submitted a personal statement; a copy of DD Form 2366, Montgomery GI Bill Act of 1984, dated 11 Jan 96; a copy of Standard Form 600, Chronological Record of Medical Care, dated 18 Apr 98; DD...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | bc-2003-02629

    Original file (bc-2003-02629.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit C. On 28 February 1995, the Board reconsidered his request based on additional evidence he provided. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, the applicant has not provided any new documentation, or any...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03541

    Original file (BC-2006-03541.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    In support of his request, the applicant provided a copy an AFCM citation and certificate awarded to a former member of his unit which was awarded during the time he alleges he was assigned. However, after review by AFPC/DPPRY, it was discovered the applicant is also entitled to the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and one oak leaf cluster, the Air Force Good Conduct Medal, the Air Force Longevity Service Award, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm, and the Republic...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-03009

    Original file (BC-2003-03009.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    Decorations are not automatically awarded at the end of a tour; it is the supervisor’s decision as to whether or not an individual will be recommended for a decoration at any time. DPPI states that after a thorough review of the applicant’s records, there was no documentation to indicate that he had been awarded the Air Force Meritorious Service Medal or the Air Force Achievement Medal. After a thorough review of the available records, we found no evidence that the individual is eligible...