RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00033
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her spouse be awarded the Purple Heart (PH).
_________________________________________________________________
THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
In essence, her husband should be awarded the PH because he is receiving a
100% disability rating from the Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) for a
condition that he incurred during his deployment to the Persian Gulf. He
has been determined to be incompetent for pay purpose by the DVA, the
Department of Defense (DoD) and the Social Security Administration. He
requires supervision 24 hours a day.
In support of the appeal, the applicant submits a copy of a recent DVA
decision to continue awarding her husband a 100% disability rating for
memory loss with sleep problems, fatigue, headaches and spurts of rage as
due to undiagnosed illness associated with Southwest Asia.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The member enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 July 1971. He was
progressively promoted to the grade of technical sergeant.
From 2 August 1990 to 13 June 1991, he served in support of OPERATION
DESERT STORM/SHIELD and from 11 August 1990 to 12 March 1991 served in the
DESERT STORM/SHIELD area of responsibility. The Enlisted Performance
Report (EPR) rendered during this period indicates that he was deployed to
provide chemical warfare defense training to United States and Allied
troops.
On 12 April 1991, he underwent a retirement physical and was found
medically qualified. The Report of Medical History prepared in conjunction
with his retirement physical indicates that in 1990, he had recent loss of
weight due to deployment during DESERT STORM, no treatment was sought, no
diagnosis was made, and he fully recovered.
.
On 1 August 1991, he voluntarily retired for years of service established
by law.
The PH is awarded for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action
(i.e., gunshot or shrapnel wounds, hand-to-hand combat wounds, forced
aircraft bail out injuries, etc.) that required or received treatment by
medical personnel.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPPPR recommends the application be denied and states, in part, that
there is no evidence in the member’s military personnel records that
supports that he was injured as a direct result of enemy action; therefore,
he is not entitled to the PH.
The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 3 June 2003 for review and response within 30 days. However, as of this
date, this office has received no response.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of
justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence
of record and noting the applicant’s contentions, we are not persuaded that
her husband has been the victim of an error or injustice. The personal
sacrifice he endured for his country is noted and our decision in no way
diminishes the high regard we have for his service; however, insufficient
documentary evidence has been presented to warrant awarding him the Purple
Heart. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
compelling basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this
application.
4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown
that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to
our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a
hearing is not favorably considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate
the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was
denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be
reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not
considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003-00033
in Executive Session on 21 August 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Ms. Patricia D. Vestal, Panel Chair
Ms. Martha J. Evans, Member
Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 Dec 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPPPR, dated 29 May 03, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jun 03.
PATRICIA D. VESTAL
Panel Chair
A complete copy of the Record of Proceedings is at Exhibit F. In a letter to his Senator dated 23 July 1997, the applicant provided a witness' statement from his supervisor at the time and asked that he be awarded the PH. In a combat support role, applicant was wounded as a result of enemy action. On 7 December 1994, the PH Review Board denied his request for the award, stating that the documentation furnished on his behalf, in accordance with established criteria, did not...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00899
There is no indication of an aircraft accident and his being held prisoner of war (POW). The evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 8 August 2003, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. The applicant claims that his records are incomplete because they do not reflect an aircraft accident or that he was...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00533
The AFPC/DPPPR evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He did suffer the atrocity of beatings to his lower back while a POW at Stalag Luft IV and the DVA has determined his lower back condition is service-connected for the injury received while a POW. _________________________________________________________________ RECOMMENDATION OF THE BOARD: A majority of the Board finds...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03245
Ever since this injury, the right elbow and forearm area have been a problem. The applicant did not provide medical documentation to substantiate injuries received were a result of enemy action. The applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the applicant’s submission, the Board is not persuaded he should be awarded the PH Medal.
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03062
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommended disapproval of the applicant’s request to add service in the Persian Gulf and award of a medal for such service. On 25 Oct 02, they informed him that there was no documentation in his records showing that he was TDY to the Persian Gulf. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s DD Form 214 was administratively corrected to reflect that he served from 2 Aug 90 to 18...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03062
___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR recommended disapproval of the applicant’s request to add service in the Persian Gulf and award of a medal for such service. On 25 Oct 02, they informed him that there was no documentation in his records showing that he was TDY to the Persian Gulf. The evidence of record shows that the applicant’s DD Form 214 was administratively corrected to reflect that he served from 2 Aug 90 to 18...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00652
If the veteran served in the U.S. Army for his service prior to 1942 through 1946, the Army Board for Correction of Military Records would have to review that portion of the case. Unfortunately, the veteran’s Report of Separation does not support the applicant’s request for award of the Purple Medal, Air Medal, or Distinguished Flying Cross. _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2003- 00652 in...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01232
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01232 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH) Medal. After a thorough review of the applicant’s submission and the available evidence of record, the majority of the board was not persuaded that he should be awarded the Purple Heart Medal. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | Bc-2006-03893
In support of his request, the applicant submits excerpts from his military personnel records, a copy of his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and a copy of the criteria for the SWASM, KLM-SA, and KLS-K medals. DPPPR states after a thorough review of applicant’s military record and resources available, they were unable to verify applicant was in the area of eligibility in support of Operation Desert Shield/Storm. He provided an enlisted Performance Report...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00039
He did receive the National Defense Service Medal for serving on active duty during Operation DESERT SHIELD/DESERT STORM. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 18 April 2003, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of...