Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03385A
Original file (BC-2002-03385A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

                                 ADDENDUM TO
                            RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
             AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:                       DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2002-03385

                                             COUNSEL:  None

                                             HEARING DESIRED:  No

_________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

In the applicant’s appeal for reconsideration, he  requests  that  the
Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for  the  period     11  May
2000 through 10 May 2001 be  declared  void  and  he  receive  Special
Selection Board consideration for promotion to the grade of lieutenant
colonel  by  the  Calendar  Years  2001B  (CY01B)  and  2002A  (CY02A)
Lieutenant Colonel Selection Boards.
_________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving on  extended  active  duty  in  the
grade of lieutenant colonel.

Applicant was considered and not selected for promotion to  the  grade
of colonel by the CY01B and CY02B Colonel Selection Boards.

On 12 December 2001, the applicant appealed the contested report under
the provisions of AFI  36-2401  and  the  appeal  was  considered  and
returned without action by the Evaluation Report Appeal Board  (ERAB).
The ERAB recommended that the applicant request a  new  and  impartial
investigation into the case by  an  agency  not  affiliated  with  the
medical organization or the chain of command, such as, the  81  TRW/IG
or 81 TRW/MEO offices.  The  findings  of  this  new  and  independent
investigation will ensure the applicant receives due  process.   These
findings can then be resubmitted in another appeal, if desired.

On 3 June 2003, a similar appeal was  considered  and  denied  by  the
Board.  For an accounting of the rationale of the earlier decision  by
the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H.

On  15  July   2003,   the   applicant   submitted   a   request   for
reconsideration.  In further support of his  request,  he  provided  a
personal statement, additional statements  from  his  co-workers,  and
copies of correspondence he believes supports  his  contentions.   His
complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit I.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

After a thorough review of the  evidence  of  record  and  applicant’s
submission, we remain unconvinced that he was the victim of either  an
error or an injustice.  We conclude the contested OPR was  appropriate
and sustainable based upon  the  evidence  supplied  by  the  existing
record.  The applicant, along with the statements provided, still  has
not established to our satisfaction that the base for the rating chain
was unfounded or indefensible.  As the applicant has failed to sustain
his burden of having suffered either an error or an injustice, we find
no compelling basis to overturn our earlier  determination  that  this
case should be denied.

_________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The  applicant  be  notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error  or  injustice;  that  the
application was denied without a personal  appearance;  and  that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon  the  submission  of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

_________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered Docket  Number  BC-2003-
03385 in Executive Session on 26 August 2003, under the provisions  of
AFI 36-2603:

                             Mr. Wayne R. Gracie, Panel Chair
                             Mr. E. David Hoard, Member
                             Ms. Carolyn J. Watkins-Taylor, Member

The following documentary evidence relating to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-
2003-03385 was considered:

   Exhibit H.  Record of Proceedings, dated 1 Jul 03, w/atchs.
   Exhibit I.  Letter, Applicant, dated 15 Jul 03, w/atchs.




                                   WAYNE R. GRACIE
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03385

    Original file (BC-2002-03385.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The contested OPR included a statement from a former supervisor who manipulated a former employee to file a sexual harassment complaint in order to discredit him. The rating chain and commander determined that it was appropriate to mention this within his 10 May 2001 OPR. AFPC/DPPPO complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01219

    Original file (BC-2003-01219.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The OPR was not in his OSR at the time the selection board convened on 3 December 2001. Applicant’s contentions are duly noted; however, after thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record, we are not persuaded that his records were incomplete at the time he was considered for promotion to the grade of colonel by the CY01B central colonel selection board. The applicant contends that the Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 13 April 2001 through 18 October 2001 was not in...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-00702A

    Original file (BC-2002-00702A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-00702 INDEX CODE: 131.00 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests the Officer Performance Report (OPR) closing 1 February 1999 be declared void and replaced with a reaccomplished report and he be considered for promotion...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00031

    Original file (BC-2003-00031.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    His Officer Selection Brief (OSB) for the CY01B Lieutenant Colonel Selection Board be corrected to reflect his correct duty history. In support of his appeal, the applicant provided a personal statement, a reaccomplished Officer Performance Report for the period 10 May 1998 through 26 February 1999, letter from the rater, dated 18 December 2001, letter from his former supervisor, dated 12 April 2002, the Officer Selection Brief prepared for the CY01B Central Lieutenant Colonel...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-01373

    Original file (BC-2003-01373.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01373 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His duty history on the Officer Selection Brief (OSB) and duty title on the Promotion Recommendation Form (PRF) prepared for the Calendar Year 2001B (CY01B) Lieutenant Colonel Central Selection Board (P0501B) be corrected, and his corrected record be...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00246

    Original file (BC-2003-00246.doc) Auto-classification: Approved

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: As a squadron commander, he received an OPR that was inconsistent with prior evaluation due to a personality conflict with the wing commander and lack of feedback from the logistics group commander. The additional rater of the contested report was also the additional rater for the previous OPR closing 16 Mar 00. He also indicated he received no performance feedback.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-03562-2

    Original file (BC-2002-03562-2.DOC) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03562-2 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 131.01 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he requests his P0500A promotion recommendation form (PRF) be corrected to reflect a $166 million program versus an $80 million...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02770A

    Original file (BC-2002-02770A.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    A complete copy of the applicant’s submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit G. Since the Article 32 ROI was not obtainable when the applicant’s appeal was first reviewed and based on what appeared to be excerpts of the ROI in his latest submission, on 28 Mar 03 the AFBCMR Staff requested he provide a complete copy of the Article 32 ROI for the Board to examine when his case was reviewed for possible reconsideration. Also provided is a 4 Oct 00 letter from the wing commander dismissing...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2002-02718

    Original file (BC-2002-02718.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02718 INDEX CODE: 111.01, 111.05, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: In the applicant’s request for reconsideration, he again requests the Officer Performance Report (OPR) rendered for the period 25 April 1996 through 24 April 1997, be declared void and replaced with a...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00821

    Original file (BC-2004-00821.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00821 (Case 2) INDEX CODE: 131.00, 131.01 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Officer Performance Report (OPR), rendered for the period 11 September 2000 through 10 September 2001, be replaced with the revised OPR he provided, reflecting the words “squadron command equivalent” in Section...