RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03246
COUNSEL: TOM HOLLAND, DVA
HEARING DESIRED: YES
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Her reenlistment code is unjust due to the fact that the Air Force
Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) has changed her discharge to honorable
instead of general.
In support of her request, applicant provided a copy of the Correction of
Military Records directed by the Air Force Discharge Review Board, Reserve
Order, A-042, dated 20 Nov 02, Request and Authority For Change of
Administrative Order, dated 21 Nov 02, Reserve Order, A-158, dated 19 Apr
01, relieving applicant from duty, and emails from ARPC/DPSZ and AFPC/MRBR.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 22 Jul 91. She was
progressively promoted to the grade of staff sergeant, having assumed that
grade effective and with a date of rank of 1 Nov 95.
On 26 Oct 00, the applicant was notified that she was being discharged
under the provisions of AFI 36-3209, Chapter 3, para 3.21.2.4, for a
pattern of misconduct, failure to meet financial obligations.
On 19 Apr 01, Reserve Order A-158, discharged the applicant from the Air
Force Reserve effective 4 May 01 with service characterized as general
(under honorable conditions) and a reenlistment eligibility status as
ineligible.
On 7 Feb 02, the Discharge Review Board reviewed the applicant’s request
and concluded that the applicant presented sufficient evidence to justify
that an inequity or impropriety occurred. The applicant’s discharge was
upgraded to honorable and changed the basis of her discharge to Secretarial
Authority. The Discharge Review Board considered but declined to change
her RE code, vote 3 TO 2 to change (Exhibit B).
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPM reviewed applicant's request and stated that the applicant’s sole
justification in support of this request is that the AFDRB has recently
directed that the characterization of her discharge from the service be
changed from general to honorable. Characterization of a member’s service
on a DD Form 214 has no bearing on a reenlistment eligibility
determination. It is solely the duty of the member’s commander to render a
decision as to reenlistment eligibility status of an individual. They did
not see anywhere in the member’s paperwork where she refutes the paperwork
that accompanies any reenlistment recommendation, namely an AF Form 418.
The commander has made an overt statement by declaring the individual
ineligible to reenlist; therefore we recommend disapproval of the member’s
request. However, if the decision is to grant the relief requested the
record should be corrected to show the member is eligible to reenlist.
ARPC/DPM complete evaluation is at Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluation and stated that her reason
to change her reenlist eligibility is many and not the sole justification
that Col Bowen suggests. If only the colonel had spoken to her, there would
be a better understanding and the letter she sent would not seem so
negative toward a person the colonel does not know.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or
regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of an error or injustice. After noting the findings of the
Discharge Review Board (DRB) and their decision to upgrade the applicant's
discharge to honorable, the majority of the Board believes she should be
provided another opportunity to serve in the military. In addition, we
noted that the DRB voted 4 to 1 to change her RE code, but at that time the
DRB policy was that it had to be an unanimous decision to change an RE
code. In view of the above, the majority of the Board recommends that her
record be corrected to the extent indicated below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating
to APPLICANT be corrected to show that RESERVE ORDER A-042, issued on 20
November 2002,be amended to read that she was separated with a reenlistment
eligibility status of “ELIGIBLE.”
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered Docket Number 02-03246 in
Executive Session on 23 April 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Mr. William H. Anderson, Jr., Member
Mr. James W. Russell, III, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to correct the records as recommended.
Mr. Russell voted to deny the application and did not wish to submit a
Minority Report. The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 Oct 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPM, dated 21 Jan 03.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Feb 03.
Exhibit E. Applicant’s Response, undated.
CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-03246
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air Force
Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority of Section
1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that, RESERVE ORDER A-042,
issued on 20 November 2002, be amended to read that she was separated with
a reenlistment eligibility status of “ELIGIBLE.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03483
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03483 INDEX CODE: 110.02 COUNSEL: American Legion HEARING DESIRED: Yes _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. On 6 April 1987, she received another Article 15 that imposed reduction in grade to Airman Basic (AB/E-1) for two additional charges...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-1994-00174-2
ADDENDUM TO RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1994-00174 INDEX CODE: 110.02, 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her general discharge be upgraded, her reason for separation (Misconduct - Pattern of Minor Disciplinary Infractions) and separation code be changed, and her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2B be changed. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03000
She served 2 years, 2 months and 13 days of active service. The AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE stated that the Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service” is correct. However, after reviewing the applicant’s records, the Board believes the narrative reason for separation and her current RE code are somewhat harsh.
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03125
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03125 INDEX NUMBER: 131.05 XXXXXXX COUNSEL: None XXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: No MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 Apr 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her date of rank (DOR) be changed from 18 May 05 to 11 Dec 04. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was notified...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02576
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02576 INDEX CODE: 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 4H be changed. Applicant was honorably discharged on 30 Nov 98 under the provisions of AFI 36-3208 (Hardship) and assigned an RE code of 4H (Serving suspended punishment pursuant to Article 15,...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01257 INDEX CODE 131.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her time spent completing her degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that her date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2LT) would be 9 Jun 00, rather than 12 Feb 01. A complete copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04042
SSgt --- correctly states the fact that since the time the AF Form 24 was signed, she has performed her duties as an officer in the Air Force and has been promoted to 1Lt. Again, this information does not accurately reflect her career as an officer in the Air Force and in no way should this information appear someday to a major’s board. After reviewing the evidence of record, which includes a statement from her commander, the Board believes that the entry in question was not relevant to...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02059
The former member's request for upgrade of his discharge from under other than honorable to honorable was considered by the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) on 26 Jul 82. DPPRS indicated that, at the time the Air Force Review Board upgraded the former member's discharge to general, they stated that "further upgrade of the discharge was not appropriate because his records reflect extensive, though minor, acts of misconduct. We note that the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB)...
Too much emphasis was placed on a Letter of Admonition (LOA); there was bias by the additional rater; and, the number of days of supervision is incorrect. The HQ AFPC/DPPPEP evaluation is at Exhibit C. HQ AFPC/DPPPWB stated that the first time the contested report was considered in the promotion process was Cycle 01E7 to master sergeant (E-7), promotions effective Aug 01 - Jul 02. However, they do not, in the Board majority’s opinion, support a finding that the evaluators were unable to...
Therefore, under the authority delegated in AFI 36-2603, the applicant's records will be corrected as set forth in the accompanying Memorandum for the Chief of Staff signed by the Executive Director of the Board or his designee. Members of the Board Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Mr. William H. Anderson and Mr. James Russell, III considered this application on 23 April 2003. CHARLES E. BENNETT Panel Chair Attachment: Ltr, ARPC/DPB, dated 27 Mar 03 AFBCMR 03-00840 MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF...