Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02460
Original file (BC-2002-02460.doc) Auto-classification: Denied



                       RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
         AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:      DOCKET NUMBER:  02-02460
            INDEX CODE:  100.03

            COUNSEL:  NONE

            HEARING DESIRED: NO

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He  be  reimbursed  for  the  Family  Servicemembers’  Group   Life
Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from his pay.

___________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He declined the FSGLI in Oct because his spouse is also a  military
member.

In support of his appeal,  applicant  provided  a  copy  of  MILMOD
inquiry reflecting a change as of 15 May 02 and a copy of his Leave
and Earnings statement for 15 Jul 02.

Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

___________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 5 June 2001, Public Law 107-14,  Survivor  Benefits  Improvement
Act of 2001, established an expanded SGLI program to provide spouse
and/or  children  coverage  in  the  event  of  their  death.   The
coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces
who had a  spouse  and/or  children,  unless  the  member  declined
coverage.

___________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

HQ AFPC/DPW reviewed this application and recommended denial.  They
indicate that according to their records,  the  applicant  has  not
declined his FSGLI coverage, nor is there  any  evidence  submitted
which indicates any injustice occurred.

A complete copy of the evaluation is at Exhibit B.

___________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to  the  applicant
on 17 Jan 03 for review and comment within 30  days.   As  of  this
date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C).

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided  by  existing
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient  relevant   evidence   has   been   presented   to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice of
the applicant's complete submission in judging the  merits  of  the
case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of  the
Air  Force  office  of  primary  responsibility  and  adopt   their
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that  the  applicant  has
not been the victim of an error or injustice.   Therefore,  in  the
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no compelling basis to
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

___________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified  that  the  evidence  presented  did  not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that  the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that  the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of  newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

___________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket  Number
02-02460  in  Executive  Session  on  15  April  2003,  under   the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

      Mr. Joseph G. Diamond, Panel Chair
      Ms. Brenda L. Romine, Member
      Mr. Edward Parker, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 17 Jul 02, w/atchs.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, HQ ARPC/DPS, dated 6 Jan 03, w/atch.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Jan 03.




                                   JOSEPH G. DIAMOND
                                   Panel Chair

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03610

    Original file (BC-2002-03610.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was attending basic military training at the time declination of FSGLI needed to be accomplished and had no way of knowing about the new insurance coverage or the accruing debt. Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. DPS states that the applicant completed the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) election statement declining coverage on 4 Sep 02, which became effective 1 Oct 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03779

    Original file (BC-2002-03779.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member decline coverage. As of this...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03609

    Original file (BC-2002-03609.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ ARPC/DPS recommends the application be denied. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member decline coverage. DPS states...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03849

    Original file (BC-2002-03849.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Applicant's Master...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03848

    Original file (BC-2002-03848.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    Applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. ___________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. Applicant's Master...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00830

    Original file (BC-2003-00830.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the member declined coverage. His MPF could not find a copy of his letter declining coverage. HQ ARPC extensively advertised the change to the program, including an article in the Air Reserve Personnel Update, and the notifications sent to the applicant’s address contained information regarding the FSGLI changes.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-02783

    Original file (BC-2003-02783.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse or child(ren), unless the member declined coverage. Although premiums had not yet been deducted from her pay, the applicant’s spouse was insured for $100,000 for the period 1 November 2001 - 30 June 2003. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02975

    Original file (BC-2002-02975.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPW recommends the application be denied due to lack of sufficient evidence to support the applicant’s claim. Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Sep 02. Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPW, dated 3 Dec 02, w/atch Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Dec 02.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03642

    Original file (BC-2002-03642.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She submitted an SGFLV 8386A declining spouse coverage. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPS states that all members of the Participating Individual Ready Reserve were notified concerning the new law and declination procedures in August and October 2001. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03036

    Original file (BC-2002-03036.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03036 INDEX NUMBER: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: She be reimbursed for the Family Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (FSGLI) premiums deducted from her pay. The coverage, by law, was automatic for all members of the Armed Forces who had a spouse and/or children, unless the...