RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02438
COUNSEL: None
HEARING DESIRED: No
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His time spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program
(EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that his date of rank
(DOR) to second lieutenant would be 14 Dec 99, rather than 22 Sep 00.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Discrepancies between current Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) and
Air Reserve Personnel Center (ARPC) promotion instructions adversely
affect Educational Delay students who complete the Educational Delay
Program (EDP) in less than two (2) years. He completed his degree on
the EDP early and, instead of receiving 100% credit for the 24 months
toward time in grade (TIG), he is being penalized for his diligence
and effort with a 50% reduction in his TIG. The injustice occurs in
the transition from being governed by ARPC’s regulations to AFPC’S
regulations. Specifically, there is an inequity in how each
organization computes an individual’s current grade date of rank
(CGDOR) for individuals participating in EDP. Had he completed his
master’s degree in 24 months, he would have been promoted to the grade
of lLT while in a reserve status and would have entered active duty as
a lLT. However, because he completed the requirements in
approximately 19 months versus 24 months, he is being penalized.
On 10 Jan 00, he entered the Educational Delay Program (EDP) to
complete the requirements for his master’s degree. While
participating in the program, he was assigned to the Obligated Reserve
Section (OSR) concurrent with his appointment in the Air Force
Reserve. Upon completing his master’s degree (10 Jan 00 to 15 May
01), on 30 Jun 01, he was ordered to Extended Active Duty (EAD) in the
grade of second lieutenant (2LT), with a CGDOR of 22 Sep 00.
The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant was commissioned on 14 Dec 99 and entered active duty on
30 Jun 01 as a second lieutenant. He is currently serving on EAD in
the grade of 2LT, with a DOR of 22 Sep 00.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
HQ AFPC/DPPAO recommends the application be denied. DPPAO states that
the applicant was credited with 9 months and 8 days of total service
and given a date of rank of 22 Sep 00 as a 2LT. The applicant
provided no evidence that he was miscounseled. DPPAO indicated that,
based on governing directives, the applicant’s DOR was computed
correctly. However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought,
the applicant’s record should be corrected to reflect a DOR of 14 Dec
99 as a 2LT. The HQ AFPC/DPPAO evaluation, with attachments, is at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and indicated that his
application was submitted in order to bring to the attention of the
Board an inequity between AFPC and ARPC in the date of rank/promotion
guidelines that creates an injustice for a select few officers. The
applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of error or injustice warranting correction.
Notwithstanding the fact that the applicant’s plight was caused by
correct application of current policy, the Board agrees with the
applicant that he is being penalized for completing his education
program earlier than 24 months. We find it troubling that, had the
applicant taken the full 24 months to complete his program, he would
have entered active duty as a second lieutenant with a DOR of 14 Dec
99, rather than 22 Sep 00, and been promoted to first lieutenant at a
much earlier date. The Board finds it plausible that the applicant
believed he would receive full credit for time spent in school. In
our opinion, requiring the applicant to wait the additional time to be
promoted to first lieutenant would constitute an injustice.
Therefore, we recommend that the record be corrected as indicated
below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, at the time he was
ordered to extended active duty on 30 June 2001, he was awarded a
current grade date of rank as a second lieutenant of 14 December 1999,
and that he was promoted to the grade of first lieutenant on 14
December 2001.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 3 March 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Panel Chair
Mr. William H. Anderson, Member
Mr. Edward H. Parker, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR 02-02438 was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Jul 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, HQ AFPC/DPPAO, dated 3 Aug 02, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Sep 02.
Exhibit E. Letter from Applicant, dated 11 Sep 02.
CHARLES E. BENNETT
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-02438
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that, at the time he
was ordered to extended active duty on 30 June 2001, he was awarded a
current grade date of rank as a second lieutenant of 14 December 1999,
and that he was promoted to the grade of first lieutenant on 14
December 2001.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02438
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02438 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His time spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that his date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant would be 14 Dec 99, rather than 22 Sep 00. We find it troubling that, had the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02496
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-02496 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His time spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that his date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2LT) would be 1 July 2000, rather than 6 January 2001. We find it troubling that, had...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: 02-01257 INDEX CODE 131.05 COUNSEL: None HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her time spent completing her degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP) be recalculated to provide 100% credit so that her date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2LT) would be 9 Jun 00, rather than 12 Feb 01. A complete copy of...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-01381
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Prior to 1 Jul 92, 100% (day-for-day) service credit was earned by personnel completing the EDP. The governing Reserve AFI and the active duty instruction provide for the same result--half credit for the time the applicant spends in school. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice to warrant awarding the applicant 100% credit for time spent in...
A complete copy of the evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant concurs that, according to the current Air Force Instruction, his DOR was indeed computed correctly. An officer on EDP as a member of the Reserves for 2 years is promoted to first lieutenant. However, if that same officer is called to active duty at 1 year, 11 months and 31 days, he remains a second...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01074 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2Lt) be recalculated to provide 100% credit for the months he spent completing his degree in the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) Educational Delay Program (EDP). However, he...
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 01-01074 INDEX CODE: 131.05 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) to second lieutenant (2Lt) be recalculated to provide 100% credit for the months he spent completing his degree in the Air Force Institute of Technology (AFIT) Educational Delay Program (EDP). However, he...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03157
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03157 INDEX CODE: APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) be recalculated to provide one hundred (100) percent credit for the months spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments,...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03157
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-03157 INDEX CODE: APPLICANT COUNSEL: None SSN HEARING DESIRED: No _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His date of rank (DOR) be recalculated to provide one hundred (100) percent credit for the months spent completing his degree on the Educational Delay Program (EDP). A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachments,...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-03417
A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant exposes what he feels is an apparent inconsistency between AFPC and ARPC guidelines that both deal with promotions and dates of rank of personnel participating in the Education Delay Program. The applicant argues that that same member who completes his education early and transfers to active...