RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-02091
INDEX CODE: 102.06
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The date of his discharge from the Inactive Status List Reserve
Section (ISLRS) be changed from 9 Feb 78 to 9 Jul 76.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was released from active duty in Mar 74. His six-year military
service obligation (MSO) ended in Sep 74. He was contacted in Jul 76
that he was to be administratively discharged from the Air Force
Reserve (ISLRS). He firmly believes that he was discharged on that
date. He joined the United States Naval Reserve in 1981. At that
time, his records were not supposed to reflect the period of time in
ISLRS. This time is paramount in that it shortens the date of his 30
years of commissioned service in the United States Naval Reserve.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provided an expanded statement
and a letter from the Personnel Support Division (ARPC/DPAF) regarding
correction of his military records.
Applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Applicant was appointed a second lieutenant, Reserve of the Air Force,
on 20 Dec 68. He was released from active duty on 4 Mar 74 in the
grade of captain and transferred to the Obligated Reserve Section
(ORS) on 5 Mar 74.
By Reserve Order HB-004601, dated 1 Sep 74, the applicant was
reassigned to ISLRS effective 30 Sep 74.
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air
Force.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
ARPC/DPP recommended denial noting that on 28 Jul 76, the Discharge
Branch (ARPC/DPAAD) notified the applicant by letter that he was being
screened for possible administrative discharge, due to prolonged
assignment to ISLRS. The applicant was offered a number of options as
a result of the ISLRS screening process and he chose to pursue a
possible assignment with the Ready Reserve. This stopped any further
administrative discharge board action for the immediate future and
allowed the applicant to remain in ISLRS to search for a participating
assignment. On 11 Aug 77, DPAAD informed the applicant his case was
being referred to an administrative discharge board since confirmation
of the applicant receiving a Ready Reserve participating assignment
had not been received. The applicant replied to DPAAD stating he
still wanted help in acquiring an assignment but was told in a
telephone conversation that no such assignment was available. The
applicant’s case was reviewed in a disposition board that met on 17
Nov 77, and the board recommended the applicant’s retention in ISLRS
be terminated and he be honorably discharged from the Air Force
Reserve. The Commander of ARPC approved these recommendations and the
applicant was formally discharged from the Air Force Reserve effective
9 Feb 78.
ARPC/DPP stated that they are in agreement with the detailed
explanation the Personnel Support Division (ARPC/DPAF) sent the
applicant explaining how the assignment process works and how the
service time is calculated with one exception. The applicant’s MSO
started on his initial entry into military service on 9 Jul 68, giving
him an MSO of six years until 8 Jul 74, in accordance with AFI 36-
2115, Table 5.2, Rule 3. Their review of the applicant’s record did
not reveal anything contrary to what has already been explained other
than this, and they found no relevant evidence to justify a change of
service dates.
According to ARPC/DPP, the applicant was properly advised of the
options available while assigned to ISLRS and correspondence in his
record shows he opted to obtain an assignment, resulting in extending
the time in this Reserve category.
A complete copy of the ARPC/DPP evaluation, with attachment, is at
Exhibit C.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
In his response, the applicant indicated he would simply like to
reiterate that he firmly believes he was discharged in Jul 76 due to a
prolonged assignment in ISLRS. At that time, he replied stating he
would like to participate in an active Air Force Reserve status only
if offered an assignment to a Ready Reserve unit at McChord AFB,
Washington. He also had contacted the section handling Reserve status
affairs and they also confirmed that he was under no further
obligation at that time. Eventually, he was sent another Notification
of Proposed Action letter on 11 Aug 77 stating that he would be
discharged from ISLRS (although he thought he was already discharged
in Jul 76). This letter also stated that he was not in a Ready Reserve
status. He was sent another letter on 9 Feb 78 stating that he was
finally discharged. He did not realize that these later dates and
correspondence erroneously leaving him in ISLRS would eventually
affect his 30-year commissioning date of service. He categorically
should not have been extended in ISLRS. He believes the errors
occurred in his ISLRS periods was due to the fact that he had sent in
a letter of interest for assistance in finding an Air Force Reserve
unit and was not attended for any other purpose. That somehow
incorrectly extended his time in ISLRS. Again, this was an oversight
error.
Applicant’s complete response is at Exhibit E.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law
or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the
existence of error or injustice. The evidence of record indicates
that the applicant was assigned to ISLRS on 30 Sep 74 and was
eventually discharged from the Air Force Reserve on 9 Feb 78 after a
prolonged assignment in ISLRS. The applicant now requests that his
records be corrected to reflect that he was discharged on 9 Jul 76,
claiming that after receiving notification, he believed he was to be
discharged in Jul 76. However, after a thorough review of the facts
and circumstances of this case, we note the applicant was notified
that he was being screened for possible administrative discharge. It
appears that he was offered a number of options as a result of the
screening process and chose to pursue a possible reassignment out of
ISLRS, which continued until Aug 77, when he was informed that his
case was to be referred to a administrative discharge board. The board
convened on 17 Nov 77 and recommended that his retention in ISLRS be
terminated and he be honorably discharged, which occurred on 9 Feb 78.
No evidence has been presented which
would lead the Board to believe that the additional time the applicant
was assigned to ISLRS was erroneous, or that he was improperly advised
regarding his options while assigned to ISLRS. Notwithstanding this,
a majority of the Board notes that the applicant continued his
military service in the Naval Reserve after his discharge, where he is
currently serving as a Senior Naval Officer. It appears now that he
has been offered the opportunity for an active duty assignment with
the Navy. However, because the inclusion of his time in ISLRS would
result in his exceeding his mandatory service date (MSD), he would be
prevented from accepting the assignment. The majority also notes the
applicant's dedicated service to his country over the years and his
willingness to continue to be of service to the nation. Therefore,
the majority believes that the applicant should not be precluded from
rendering further service if the Navy desires to have him. The
majority notes the applicant's request that his date of discharge from
ISLRS be changed to 9 Jul 76. However, since it appears that the
applicant's MSO ended on 9 Jul 74, a majority of the Board is inclined
to change his discharge date to his MSO expiration date, and
recommends that his records be corrected as set forth below.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 9 Jul 74, he was
discharged from all appointments in the United States Air Force.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number 02-
02091 in Executive Session on 11 Mar 03, under the provisions of AFI
36-2603:
Mr. David C. Van Gasbeck, Panel Chair
Mr. George Franklin, Member
Ms. Martha Maust, Member
By a majority vote, the Board voted to correct the records, as
recommended. Mr. Van Gasbeck voted to deny relief but did not desire
to submit a minority report. The following documentary evidence was
considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Nov 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, ARPC/DPP, dated 20 Dec 02, w/atch.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 3 Jan 03.
Exhibit E. Letter, applicant, dated 10 Jan 03.
DAVID C. VAN GASBECK
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-02091
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to , be corrected to show that on 9 Jul 74, he was
discharged from all appointments in the United States Air Force.
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00137
His commander received an informal email in late November 2002 requesting that an Officer Performance Report (OPR) be prepared for the February 2003 major board. Since he is no longer a member of the Air Force Reserve as a result of the two nonselections, he is not eligible for consideration by a Reserve promotion board. All of the officers selected for promotion by the FY03 board had completed SOS and 94% of the officers selected by the FY04 board had completed SOS.
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2005-02405
In the alternative, applicant requests his MSD be changed to reflect 20 March 2010, based on the date he should have been assigned to ISLRS (24 Aug 84) versus the date he was assigned (19 Oct 84). _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPP states Reserve officers generally remain assigned to ISLRS for three years after which time they can be screened for an administrative discharge board, tender their resignation, or transfer to a...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02340
He did not find out he had been considered for promotion to the grade of major until after his second promotion deferral. Air Force Reserve members requesting voluntary reassignment to an inactive status are assigned to either the Obligated Reserve Section (ORS) if their Military Service Obligation (MSO) has not been completed, or to the Non- obligated Non-participating Ready Personnel Section (NNRPS) once their MSO has been completed. During his transition out of the military, he did not...
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His Total Federal Commissioned Service Date (TFCSD), Total Years Service Date (TYSD), Pay Date, and Mandatory Separation Date (MSD) are in error. With his five years in the active Air Force, he had almost eighteen years of military service when he was informed in Jan 00, that he would be discharged immediately. There was no evidence that the applicant was informed by ARPC of the implications of his...
An election not to participate in the SBP is irrevocable if not revoked before the date on which the member first becomes entitled to retired pay. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Exhibit E. Letter,...
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, ARPC/DPP, reviewed the application and states that in accordance with Title 10 USC, Section 12731, in order for a service member to be eligible for retired Reserve pay, the service member must complete at least 20 years of satisfactory service with the last six years of service in a Reserve component. In reviewing the service member's record he had over 19...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03681
He was transferred to ISLRS on 20 Oct 87, and remained in ISLRS until 19 Jul 96, when he was honorably discharged from all appointments in the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPA recommended denial indicating that, as required by AFI 36- 3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members, the Air Force Reserve Personnel Center periodically screens officers assigned to ISLRS...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-03440
Although assignment to ISLRS is a break in active Reserve status, and an officer’s date of rank is adjusted accordingly, since they are ineligible for promotion consideration, it is not a break in service. Although applicant had four years, four months, and 12 days of non- participating service, he has had no break in service, and no error or injustice occurred with his assignment to ISLRS and subsequent change to his R/R date. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01162
The time he was retained in the Inactive Status List Reserve Section (ISLRS) from 1 Mar 99 through 9 Nov 05 be removed. When discharged, the applicant received separation pay and was transferred to the NNRPS for a period of three years. If the Board approves, the applicants record should be corrected to show a 1 Mar 02 to 9 Nov 05 break in service and reappointment into his new position on 10 Nov 05.
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The Director of Personnel Program Management, HQ ARPC/DPP, stated that the member began drawing Air Force Reserve retired pay effective 5 Aug 93, his 60th birthday, until his death on 18 Jul 98. A complete copy of this evaluation is at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the advisory opinion and...