RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01957
INDEX CODE: 110.00
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The Character of Service on her DD Form 214, Block 24, be corrected to
read “honorable” rather than “uncharacterized.”
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
She served in the U.S. Air Force and was given a discharge due to
medical conditions and was granted 20% service connected compensation
by the Department of Veterans Affairs for the same disabilities that
prevented her from serving her full enlistment. She respectfully
requests that she be granted an honorable discharge for her true and
faithful service in the U.S. Air Force.
In support of the appeal, applicant provides a copy of her DD Form
214, a copy of a letter from the Department of Veterans Affairs
granting her claim for a compensation, and a copy of her Rating
Decision.
Applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is attached at
Exhibit A.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 24 July 1998.
On 7 October 1998, the applicant was diagnosed as having an adjustment
disorder with depressed mood. This diagnosis did not meet retention
standards for continued military service and her ability to function
in the military was significantly impaired. On 16 October 1998, the
commander notified the applicant that she was being discharged for a
condition that interfered with military service, specifically for
mental disorders.
On 29 October 1998, the applicant was administratively discharged with
an entry-level separation for an unsuiting Adjustment Disorder, with
character of service as uncharacterized. She served a total of 4
months and 6 days of active duty.
_________________________________________________________________
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The BCMR Medical Consultant states that Adjustment Disorder is
characterized by marked psychological distress in response to
identifiable stressors that overcome the individual’s ability to cope
and is frequently associated with significant impairment in social and
occupational functioning. The emotional and behavioral responses may
be in excess of what would normally be expected given the nature of
the stressors. Manifestations can include depressed mood, anxiety,
and disturbances of conduct. A key feature of Adjustment Disorder is
that the condition typically resolves with relief of the stressors and
criteria for depression are not met. Adjustment Disorder when severe
enough is unsuiting for continued military service and cause for
administrative discharge.
Airmen are in entry-level status during the first 180 days of
continuous active military service and if administratively separated
during this period receive an entry-level separation. This discharge
does not attempt to characterize the type of service as either good or
bad, thus the DD 214 reflects “uncharacterized”. An honorable
characterization may be given by the Secretary of the Air Force only
when it is clearly warranted by unusual circumstances of personal
conduct and performance of military duty. Adjustment Disorder is an
unsuiting condition that does not qualify for entry into the
disability evaluation system and service is not characterized if
administrative separation occurs during the entry-level status period.
A general discharge characterization would be appropriate if there
was misconduct.
The applicant’s DD 214 states the reason for discharge as “personality
disorder.” This is an administrative label that does not coincide
with current diagnostic terminology and in some cases can be
misleading when the discharge was for adjustment disorder. There is
no evidence apparent in the available documentation that the applicant
had a personality disorder (as defined by the Diagnostic and
Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders) diagnosed or the presence of
traits suggestive of a personality disorder.
Action and disposition in this care are proper and equitable
reflecting compliance with Air Force directives that implement the
law, however, the narrative reason for discharge in this is
misleading. Therefore, the BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion
that the narrative reason for discharge be changed to Secretary
Authority. No change in the characterization of service is warranted.
A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C.
AFPC/DPPRS states that they concur with the BCMR Medical Consultant
and recommend the narrative reason for separation be changed to “JFF-
Secretarial Authority.” No change in the characterization of service
is warranted.
A complete copy of their evaluation is attached at Exhibit D.
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
On 1 November 2002, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded
to the applicant for review and response within 30 days. As of this
date, no response has been received by this office.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice. After reviewing the
evidence of record, we are persuaded that the applicant has been the
victim of an injustice. The detailed comments provided by the Medical
Consultant are noted and we are in agreement with his recommendation.
Therefore, in the intent of equity and justice, we recommend the
applicant’s records be corrected to the extent indicated below.
4. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of probable error or injustice warranting changing the
character of service. The Board notes that the uncharacterized
character of service that the applicant received indicates an
uncharacterized entry level separation. This condition applies when
separation proceedings are initiated within 6 months of entry on
active duty. The applicant served 4 months and 6 days of total active
military service. Therefore, we find no basis to conclude that the
uncharacterized nature of her separation is erroneous or unjust.
Accordingly, her request for an honorable discharge is not favorably
considered.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that on 29 October 1998,
she was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Secretarial
Authority, and issued a Separation Program Designator of “JFF.”
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered this application in
Executive Session on 30 January 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Edward C. Koenig III, Panel Chair
Ms. Martha Maust, Member
Mr. John E. Pettit, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 8 Sep 02, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, BCMR Medical Consultant, dated 26 Sep 02.
Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPPRS, dated 22 Oct 02.
Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Nov 02.
EDWARD C. KOENIG III
Panel Chair
AFBCMR 02-01957
INDEX CODE: 110.00
MEMORANDUM FOR THE CHIEF OF STAFF
Having received and considered the recommendation of the Air
Force Board for Correction of Military Records and under the authority
of Section 1552, Title 10, United States Code (70A Stat 116), it is
directed that:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to, be corrected to show that on 29 October 1998, she
was discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Secretarial
Authority, and issued a Separation Program Designator of “JFF.”
JOE G. LINEBERGER
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2002-02377
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed applicant’s request and opined that the narrative reason for discharge can be changed to Secretarial Authority and states that no change in the characterization of service or Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code is warranted. The RE code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level characterization of service” is correct. After a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02377
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant reviewed applicant’s request and opined that the narrative reason for discharge can be changed to Secretarial Authority and states that no change in the characterization of service or Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code is warranted. The RE code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry-level characterization of service” is correct. After a...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01488
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: 02-01488 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be upgraded to 1 and that her uncharacterized entry level separation be changed to an honorable discharge. The BCMR Medical Consultant’s evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPRS recommends the narrative reason for the...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02947
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-02947 INDEX CODE: 100.03, 100.06 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to enlist in the Air National Guard. She served 3 months and 8 days on active duty and was issued an RE code of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-00868
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00868 INDEX CODE: 100.03 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to enable reenlistment into the Air Force. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2003-01172
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-01172 INDEX CODE: 112.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation and reenlistment eligibility (RE) codes be changed. She was assigned a reenlistment eligibility (RE) code of 2C, “Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation...
However, her uncharacterized discharge should not be changed as it reflects her separation before completing a period of service (i.e., 180-days of continuous active service) that would allow an honorable characterization. In addition, AFPC/DPPRS recommends changing the applicant’s separation code and narrative reason for separation to “JFF - Secretarial Authority.” AFPC/DPPRS states that the applicant’s discharge was in error and she should have been discharged under AFI 36-3208, paragraph...
AF | BCMR | CY2005 | BC-2004-00930
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2004-00930 INDEX CODE: 110.02 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx COUNSEL: NONE xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reenlistment eligibility (RE) code be changed to one that would allow her to reenlist. On 6 March 2003, the applicant was notified by her commander that he was recommending that she be...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02777
________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant states that even though the narrative reason for discharge on the applicant’s DD Form 214 is listed as personality disorder, the applicant was not diagnosed with a personality disorder. However, after reviewing the applicant’s request and the evidence of record, we find the narrative reason for her entry-level separation, “Personality Disorder,” to be inappropriate. ROSCOE...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-00201
On 7 October 1998, the applicant’s commander notified the applicant he was recommending her discharge from the United States Air Force for Mental Disorders. Evidence of the record shows that the applicant’s depressed mood resolved by the time of her separation, consistent with her diagnosis of Adjustment Disorder. Following discharge, the applicant experienced recurrent symptoms of depression and developed Major Depressive Disorder with psychosis in January 2004, five years after her discharge.