ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-1994-10349
COUNSEL: NONE
_________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His discharge be upgraded to general.
_________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 22 August 1995, the Board considered applicant’s request that his
discharge under other than honorable conditions be changed to a medical
discharge. The Board found insufficient evidence of an error or injustice
and denied the application. For an accounting of the facts and
circumstances surrounding the application, and the rationale of the earlier
decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit H.
In an application, dated 30 September 2002, the applicant requests that his
discharge be upgraded to general and provides additional documentation.
The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit I.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the
additional documentation submitted by the applicant, we find no evidence of
error or injustice. In this respect, we note that the applicant was
erroneously discharged from active duty prior to receiving dual-action
processing by the Secretary of the Air Force as required by the governing
regulations. However, based on a previous application to this Board, his
disability and administrative discharge packages were forwarded to the Air
Force Personnel Council (AFPC) for dual-action processing. After
considering his administrative discharge and disability packages, the AFPC
determined that he should have been administratively discharged. The
applicant’s contentions regarding his mental condition are noted; however,
his mental condition was considered during his processing through the
Disability Evaluation System and the AFPC’s consideration of his dual-
action processing. In view of the AFPC’s determination that he should have
been administratively discharged and since he has provided no evidence to
indicate that his separation was inappropriate, we find no compelling basis
to recommend granting the relief sought.
2. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the
discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency. We have considered the
applicant’s overall quality of service, the seriousness of the events that
precipitated the discharge, and available evidence related to his post-
service activities and accomplishments. On balance, we do not believe that
clemency is warranted.
_________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the additional evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
_________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-1994-
10349 in Executive Session on 7 April 2003, under the provisions of AFI 36-
2603:
Mr. Thomas S. Markiewicz, Vice Chair
Mr. Gregory H. Petkoff, Member
Mr. Charles E. Bennett, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit H. Record of Proceedings, dated 27 Oct 95, w/atchs.
Exhibit I. DD Form 149, dated 30 Sep 02, w/atchs.
THOMAS S. MARKIEWICZ
Vice Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03880
The discharge authority approved the discharge on 26 November 1982 and directed that he be discharged, with his service characterized as general (under honorable conditions). The applicant did not submit any new evidence or identify any errors or injustices that occurred in the discharge processing, and has provided no other facts warranting an upgrade of the discharge. We also find insufficient evidence to warrant a recommendation that the discharge be upgraded on the basis of clemency.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-01967
Other than the applicant’s attached brief and a copy of his Certificate of Military Service obtained from NPRC, the facts leading to the discharge are not available in his records. On 7 December 1979 the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) considered and denied the applicant’s request for an upgrade of his undesirable discharge to an honorable discharge. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the...
The commander told him he could, but that he would have to receive and undesirable discharge; however, after his discharge he could request the Veterans Administration (VA) upgrade his discharge to general. After thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and noting the applicant’s complete submission, we find no evidence of error or injustice. Exhibit B.
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2003-00162
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2003-00162 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. _________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The reasons the applicant believes the records to be in error or unjust...
_________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The relevant facts pertaining to this application, extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force at Exhibit C. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPPRS recommends denial. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-02903
He received an RE code of 2C, which defined means “Involuntary separation with honorable discharge; or entry-level separation without characterization of service.” _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant found that no change to applicant’s record was warranted. AFPC/DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPPAE verified that the RE code of 2C was correct. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-00130
_________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The BCMR Medical Consultant is of the opinion that no change in the records is warranted. At the time the applicant was entering the disability evaluation system, he committed a series of disciplinary infractions that violated the terms of his P&R and his commander revoked that provision and initiated execution of the previously approved administrative discharge. With respect to the applicant’s request...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-00608
Her records reflect she had a prior enlistment from 3 February 1993 to 2 March 1998. A copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluation were forwarded to the applicant and counsel on 5 May 2006, for review and response. It appears that the decision to separate the applicant was proper based on her situation at the time and the Narrative...
AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC-2002-02057
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Because the Air Force Discharge Review Board (AFDRB) upgraded his discharge from “Under Honorable Conditions (General)” to “Honorable,” his reentry code and narrative reason for separation should be changed to allow him to re-enter active military service. The DPPRS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE reviewed the applicant’s case and concludes that the RE code of 2C is correct. The DPPAE...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-04029
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-04029 INDEX CODE: COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code be changed. A complete copy of the evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPAE states that the applicant was discharged with a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. A complete copy of...